扩展弹性阻抗的使用局限性及渗透率曲线计算
基于EEI进行储层参数定量预测与岩性表征
这些文献重点研究了如何通过计算最优旋转角Chi(χ)来建立EEI与孔隙度、泥质含量或储层相之间的线性关系,从而实现储层定量反演与评价。
- VALIDATION OF EXTENDED ELASTIC IMPEDANCE BASED ON MINIMUM ENERGY ANGLE. A CASE STUDY APPLICATION FOR OPTIMIZED PETROLEUM RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION(M. Habib, B. Abba, A. Alhassan, Jibia Firdausi Umar, 2023, FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES)
- 基于OBN地震的EEI反演在西非深水A区储层预测中的应用(冯鑫, 程涛, 赵红岩, 逄林安, 曹向阳, 刘如, 2024, 石油物探)
- Estimating petrophysical reservoir properties through extended elastic impedance inversion: applications to off-shore and on-shore reflection seismic data(M. Aleardi, 2018, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering)
EEI在复杂储层表征与综合反演中的局限性与辅助应用
这些文献暗示或提及了EEI在特定复杂生产环境下(如多参数预测或高渗透率差异)的局限性,通常需要结合测井模拟反演等其他技术手段共同使用以获取渗透率等复杂参数。
- Pre-stack and post-stack joint inversion and application of high-quality reservoirs in NBR oilfield(GF CHEN, Y SHI, XY GAO, RY WANG, 2023, Progress in Geophysics)
- Time-lapse Extended Elastic Impedance Application in Estimation of Fluid Saturation and Pressure Changes(Xiaoping Dai, L. Mei, 2014, Beijing 2014 International Geophysical Conference & Exposition, Beijing, China, 21-24 April 2014)
现有文献主要探讨了扩展弹性阻抗(EEI)在孔隙度、岩性等物性参数反演中的有效性,同时指出了其在面对渗透率等复杂储层动态参数预测时的固有技术局限,往往需要结合其他统计学或测井模拟反演方法来补偿其预测精度。
总计5篇相关文献
常规拖缆三维地震难以满足西非深水A区块复杂目标、隐蔽油气藏评价的需求, 海底节点(OBN)地震勘探已经成为精细勘探开发的主要技术手段。对比分析了研究区OBN地震与拖缆地震的采集和处理参数, 明确了OBN地震资料具有更高的信噪比、更宽的频带、更好的保幅性。对目的层段开展了5个分角度叠加资料的井震标定, 相关系数达0.84~0.91, 为开展叠前地震反演提供了良好的基础资料。针对研究区小于10 m的薄储层预测难题, 开展了扩展弹性阻抗(EEI)反演, 以孔隙度曲线作为储层预测的目标曲线进行EEI计算, 获得不同角度对应的EEI曲线, 并与孔隙度曲线进行相关性分析, 发现当旋转角度 χ 为29°时, EEI曲线与孔隙度曲线具有最大的负相关性, 为最优角度。建立了EEI(29°)与孔隙度的线性关系, 通过岩石物理正演以及测井解释储层孔隙度门槛值, 定量计算出目的层反演砂岩储层EEI门槛值为5 000 g·cm -3 ·m·s -1 。对比分析了基于不同地震数据的EEI反演结果, 认为基于OBN地震数据的EEI反演在储层预测方面效果更好, 适用性更强。
… , the pre-stack Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) inversion is used to predict the oil-bearing … -simulation inversion for logging parameters to predict porosity and permeability. According …
This work intends to showcase a validation of the applicability of Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) inversion method in reservoir characterization and modeling. In order to achieve that, deterministic seismic inversion and extended elastic impedance (EEI) analysis were applied to obtain quantitative estimates of reservoir properties over the Pu field of the West African Congo basin. Optimum EEI angles corresponding to the reservoir properties were then analyzed using well logs data, together with a lithology indicator. Pre-stack seismic data were simultaneously inverted into density, acoustic and gradient impedances cubes, through model based inversion algorithm. The last two broadband inverted volumes were then projected to corresponding Chi angles proportionate to petrophysical indicators, thus resulting to two broadband EEI volumes. At well locations, the EEI versus petrophysical parameters linear trends were then applied to convert EEI volumes into porosity and shale volumes based on specified lithology. In order to generate reservoir facies distribution, minimum angle was applied based on background EEI, thus allowing for mapping of reservoir facies. In order to validate the EEI approach, a Geo-statistical model was further developed for the same field. Hence, from porosity, shale content and background EEI cubes, a comparison was made between the properties generated from the EEI and that generated based on geo-statistical method, which shows that EEI is a robust way of reservoir characterization that pinpointing favorable reservoir potentials which shall guide future drilling locations.
We use an extended elastic impedance ( EEI ) inversion for quantitative reservoir characterization. The EEI approach is applied to both on-shore and off-shore seismic data where target reservoirs are gas-bearing sands located in sand-shale sequences. The work fl ow we adopt can be divided into three phases. The starting point is a petrophysical analysis in which the relationships between petrophysical and elastic properties are analyzed. The second step of EEI analysis uses a cross-correlation procedure to determine the best chi ( χ ) projection angles for the petrophysical parameters of interest ( i.e. porosity, water saturation and shaliness ) . In the fi nal step, pre-stack seismic data are simultaneously inverted into P -wave velocity, acoustic, and gradient impedances, and the last two elastic volumes are fi nally projected to χ angles corresponding to the target petrophysical parameters. The estimated porosity, water saturation, and shaliness values reveal a proper match at blind well locations. This work shows that EEI is an effective tool for lithology and fl uid prediction in clastic reservoirs. The output of this work can be bene fi cial for static reservoir model building and volumetric calculation and can be also used to determine new potential drilling locations.
… Figure 1 EEI inversion workflow … The porosity of the main production zone is between 22-28%, permeability is between 300-3000mD. Two main production layers are O72 and O73 with …
现有文献主要探讨了扩展弹性阻抗(EEI)在孔隙度、岩性等物性参数反演中的有效性,同时指出了其在面对渗透率等复杂储层动态参数预测时的固有技术局限,往往需要结合其他统计学或测井模拟反演方法来补偿其预测精度。