免疫检查点抑制剂对肿瘤患者治疗的获益及肺癌患者受益程度

Non-small cell lung cancer is one of the most common types of malignances worldwide and the main cause of cancer-related deaths. Current treatment for NSCLC is based on surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, with poor therapeutic effectiveness. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have applied in NSCLC treatment. A large number of experimental studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors are safer and more effective than traditional therapeutic modalities and have allowed for the development of better guidance in the clinical treatment of advanced NSCLC patients. In this review, we describe clinical trials using ICI immunotherapies for NSCLC treatment, the available data on clinical efficacy, and the emerging evidence regarding biomarkers.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, mainly drugs targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) pathways, represent a remarkable advance in lung cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 are approved for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, with impressive clinical activity and durable responses in some patients. This review will summarize the mechanism of action of these drugs, the clinical development of these agents and the current role of these agents in the management of patients with lung cancer. In addition, the review will discuss the role of predictive biomarkers for optimal patient selection for immunotherapy and management of autoimmune side effects of these agents.

Simple Summary The benefit of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immunotherapy, particularly of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, in the second-line setting of patients with non-small cell lung cancer has been documented in randomized clinical trials, showing improvements in global survival and in the overall response rate. Nevertheless, patients enrolled in these studies met strict eligibility criteria, allowing for the treatment of patients that do not reflect the broader oncology patient population. Experiences from real-world data are useful in providing further evidence of the benefit of treatment in a wider range of patients, including those underrepresented in clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated in everyday practice with these drugs as the second line, and more generally with immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), showing that the efficacy and safety were comparable to those in selected studies. Results may encourage to treat patients excluded from randomized studies. Abstract Immunotherapy based on anti PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the new standard of advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are used in clinical practice. The strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials do not allow researchers to fully represent treatment effects in the patients that will ultimately use these drugs. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these drugs, and more generally of ICIs, as second-line therapy in NSCLC patients in real world practice. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to include original studies published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 32 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The overall radiological response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21%, 52%, 3.35 months and 9.98 months, respectively. The results did not change when analysis was adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and age. A unitary increase in the percent of patients with liver and CNS metastases reduced the occurrence of DCR by 7% (p < 0.001) and the median PFS by 2% (p = 0.010), respectively. The meta-analysis showed that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in everyday practice is comparable to that in clinical trials.

ABSTRACT Background Therapeutic strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) counteract the immunosuppressive effects of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and ligand-1 (PD-L1). ICI treatment has emerged in first- and second-line therapy of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As immunotherapeutic treatment with ICIs is a dynamic field where new drugs and combinations are constantly evaluated, we conducted an up-to-date systematic review on comparative efficacy and safety in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods We searched PubMed up to February 2020 and Embase, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registries up to August 2018. Additionally, we checked reference lists. We dually screened titles, abstracts and, subsequently, full-texts for eligibility. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and graded the certainty of evidence following GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). For second-line therapy, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. Due to considerable clinical heterogeneity, we reported first-line results narratively. Results Of 1497 references, we identified 22 relevant publications of 16 studies. For first-line therapy, a combination of an ICI with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to chemotherapy but increased the risk of serious adverse events. Single-agent pembrolizumab increased overall and progression-free survival in patients with PD-L1 expression of ≥50% and resulted in less TRAE than chemotherapy. Compared to placebo, maintenance therapy with durvalumab increased overall and progression-free survival at the downside of higher risk of TRAE. For second-line therapy, a random-effects meta-analysis yielded a statistically significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for ICIs compared to docetaxel (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63–0.75 for OS; HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77 − 0.93 for PFS; 6 studies, 3478 patients; median OS benefit in months: 2.4 to 4.2). In meta-analysis, risk of any treatment-related adverse events of any grade was lower for ICI than docetaxel as second-line therapy (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.73–0.79; 6 studies, 3763 patients). Conclusion In first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC, ICI is effective when combined with chemotherapy not depending on PD-L1 expression, or as monotherapy in high PD-L1 expressing tumors. For second-line therapy, single-agent ICI improves efficacy and safety compared to docetaxel.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a minority of NSCLC patients benefit from ICIs, and whether the magnitude of benefit is specific factor-dependent remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to improve our understanding of clinicopathologic and biomolecular features associated with improved survival upon treatment with ICIs for NSCLC. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to August 31, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing overall survival (OS) in NSCLC treated with ICIs vs control therapies. We calculated the pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI in subgroups using a random-effects model, and assessed the heterogeneity between the paired estimates using an interaction test. Results A total of 23 RCTs involving 15,829 patients were included. We found that wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB were associated with a significant OS benefit from ICIs, but not mutant EGFR, low PD-L1 expression, and low bTMB. The differences of OS benefit between wild-type and mutant EGFR (HR=1.53, 95%CI 1.13-2.08), high and low PD-L1 (HR=1.35; 95%CI 1.14-1.61), high and low bTMB (HR=1.71; 95%CI 1.17-2.52) were statistically significant. OS benefit was found in all subgroups regardless of sex, age, ECOG PS, histology, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis, race, and region, and the interaction test demonstrated no significant difference of the OS benefit between these opposed subgroups (e.g. male vs female). Conclusions Wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB are associated with a greater magnitude of efficacy from ICIs vs control therapies in NSCLC. However, the administration of ICIs should not be restricted to other clinicopathological factors (sex, smoking history, race, etc.).

Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant type of lung cancer, and most clinically curable patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Although the efficacy of standard platinum‐based chemotherapy doublets is relatively limited. The effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains controversial, and its role in the first‐line treatment of advanced NSCLC is obscure. Thus, we carried out a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ICIs for advanced NSCLC.

… ) tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a new … review was to investigate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with other …

ABSTRACT Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are new therapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in NSCLC. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing ICIs with control therapies in NSCLC. Data were pooled according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A total of 12 trails comprising 6,919 NSCLC patients were included in this meta-analysis. ICIs therapies significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.838; P < 0.001), overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.747; P < 0.001) and objective response rates (ORR) (RR, 1.311; P < 0.001) in NSCLC. Prognostic benefit was observed irrespective of age, sex, treatment line, performance status and histology. Survival improvement of ICIs was limited for NSCLC patients with non-smoker (PFS, P = 0.468; OS, P = 0.317) or central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (PFS, P = 0.209; OS, P = 0.090), or positive EGFR mutation (PFS, P = 0.083; OS, P = 0.522) or PD-L1 expression level less than 5% (PFS, P = 0.370; OS, P = 0.047). The relative risks of all-grade and high-grade (≥3) anemia, neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, nausea, pyrexia, asthenia and neuropathy were all decreased in patients received ICIs compared with control therapies. This meta-analysis provides clinical evidence that ICIs improve PFS, OS, and ORR in NSCLC with fewer adverse effects. Our data establish ICIs as a prefer treatment option for NSCLC patients with smoker, no CNS metastasis, wild type EGFR, and high PD-L1 expression.

Background: Organ-specific response patterns reported in previous studies indicate different response toward immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with different metastatic sites. This study aims to compare the efficacy of ICIs with conventional therapy in NSCLC patients with bone, brain or liver metastases. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched for studies comparing ICIs with conventional therapy in NSCLC patients with bone, brain or liver metastases. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among included studies was analyzed using the random effects model. Results: Eight studies consisting of 988 NSCLC patients were included, 259 with brain metastases and 729 with liver metastases. No available study with bone metastases information was identified. For patients with brain metastases, ICIs significantly improved their OS (HR, 0.57; P = 0.007). For patients with liver metastases, both OS (HR, 0.72; P = 0.006), and PFS (HR, 0.72; P = 0.004) improvements were observed in the ICI treatment arm. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on target of ICIs and treatment regimen. PD-1 inhibitors could benefit patients with liver or brain metastases on OS and PFS (brain metastases: OS, HR, 0.43; P < 0.001; liver metastases: PFS, HR, 0.52; P = 0.003; OS, HR, 0.66; P = 0.001), while PD-L1 inhibitors could not. Patients with brain metastases could only gain OS improvement from ICIs combined with chemotherapy (HR, 0.41; P = 0.001), but for patients with liver metastases, the benefit was detected using ICIs single agent (HR, 0.68; P = 0.012) or ICIs combined with chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy (HR, 0.52; P = 0.005). Conclusion: ICIs could significantly improve OS in NSCLC patients with brain or liver metastases compared with conventional therapy. Patients with brain metastases could only gain OS benefit from ICIs combined with chemotherapy, while those with liver metastases obtained superior OS from ICIs single agent or ICIs combined with chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy.

… an important way to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition. Studies in earlier … of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Cancer 2018;124:248…

The value of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for patients with lung cancer remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that might provide a reference for clinical practice. The selection criteria were defined according to the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study design (PICOS) framework. In all, 12 RCTs with 5,989 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed that ICI combination therapy was significantly associated with the improvement of overall response rate (ORR) (RR =1.44 [95% CI 1.19, 1.74], P=0.0002), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR =0.67 [95% CI 0.59, 0.77], P<0.00001), and OS (HR =0.81 [95% CI 0.70, 0.95], P=0.008) in lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, combination ICI therapy significantly prolonged OS in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (HR =0.80 [95% CI 0.73, 0.88], P<0.00001) but not in SCLC (HR =0.94 [95% CI 0.82, 1.08], P=0.40) patients. Data suggested that PD-1 inhibitors had higher efficacy and safety profiles than PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in combination ICI therapy for lung cancer patients. Furthermore, tolerability analysis revealed higher incidences of grade ≥3 AEs, fatigue, and increased transaminases from combination ICI therapy. In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that combination ICI therapy should be considered in clinical practice and future study designs for NSCLC patients. However, the current data do not support the large-scale clinical application of combination ICI therapy in SCLC patients.

INTRODUCTION KRAS mutation is the most frequent molecular alteration found in advanced NSCLC; it is associated with a poor prognosis without available targeted therapy. Treatment options for NSCLC have been recently enriched by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and data about its efficacy in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC are discordant. This study assessed the routine efficacy of ICIs in advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. METHODS In this retrospective study, clinical data were extracted from the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs and with available molecular analysis between April 2013 and June 2017. Analysis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was performed if exploitable tumor material was available. RESULTS A total of 282 patients with ICI-treated (in the first line or more) advanced NSCLC (all histological subgroups) who were treated with ICIs (anti-programmed death 1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibodies), including 162 (57.4%) with KRAS mutation, 27 (9.6%) with other mutations, and 93 (33%) with a wild-type phenotype, were identified. PD-L1 analysis was available for 128 patients (45.4%), of whom 45.3% and 19.5% had PD-L1 expression of 1% or more and 50%, respectively (49.5% and 21.2%, respectively, in the case of the 85 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC). No significant difference was seen in terms of objective response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival between KRAS-mutant NSCLC and other NSCLC. No significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival were observed between the major KRAS mutation subtypes (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12V, and G13C). In KRAS-mutant NSCLC, unlike in non-KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the efficacy of ICIs is consistently higher, even though not statistically significant, for patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of tumor cells than for those with PD-L1 expression in less than 1% of tumor cells, and this finding is especially true when PD-L1 expression is high (PD-L1 expression ≥50%). CONCLUSION For patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC (all mutational subtypes), the efficacy of ICI is similar to that for patients with other types of NSCLC. PD-L1 expression seems to be more relevant for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-mutant NSCLC than it is in other types of NSCLC.

Background Age is closely related to the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. However, we had no clear idea of the efficacy of them in elderly patients. So we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients of different age groups and summarized overall treatment-related adverse events. Materials and methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until 30th of April 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. The hazard ratio (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS, progression-free survival or adverse events (AEs) were used. Results A total of 4994 patients from 8 RCTs were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) versus chemotherapy in NSCLC patients who were less than 65 years old. Also, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93) in NSCLC patients who were more than 65 years old. However, there was no statistical significance of OS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57–1.30) among NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. It also showed that the single use of immune checkpoint inhibitors had fewer all-grade AEs. Conclusion Regardless of the NSCLC patients who were less or more than 65 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better OS than chemotherapy. But there was no significant difference when NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. Older patient should be offered immune therapies if it is possible and the mechanism in old age treatment should be further studied.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The efficacy of ICI therapy in older patients (≥65 years) is controversial and not fully clarified. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC based on age (<65 years vs. ≥65 years). Methods: A comprehensive literature search for eligible randomized control phase II/III trials that compared the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents against chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients. Pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates were calculated based on random/fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity between the studies. Results: A total of 10 studies involving 8 randomized controlled trials (2 updates) were enrolled in this meta-analysis [2,662 young patients (<65 years) and 1,971 older patients (≥65 years)]. The efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents is comparable between young (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients for OS [HR 0.75 95% CI (0.64–0.88) vs. 0.76 95% CI (0.66–0.87)]. However, our pooled analysis was not sufficient to show a significant benefit in terms of PFS for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents [HR 0.87 95% CI (0.74–1.01), P = 0.06]. In addition, we failed to see a PFS superiority of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents against chemotherapy in two age subgroups [<65 years and ≥65 years, HR 0.85 95% CI (0.72–1.01), P = 0.07 and HR 0.87 95% CI (0.68–1.10), P = 0.25]. Conclusion: ICIs therapy presents comparable efficacy in older advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with young patients.

Treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) leads to initial response in most patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast, little is known of the subpopulation of patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations who exhibit clinical outcomes that require treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, to identify eligible cases to treat with ICIs, we retrospectively analyzed the correlation between clinical features and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with EGFR mutations.

PURPOSE Combination therapies with immune checkpoint blockade demonstrate promising antitumor activity and safety in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination therapy is superior to their monotherapies, and which combination regimen is most efficacious remain unknown. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the current available evidences on the efficacy and safety of combination immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC were included. RESULTS We identified nine RCTs including a total of 5,142 patients. The study showed that the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for combination therapy were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p = 0.001) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.73, p = 0.004); the pooled odds ratios (ORs) of objective response rates (ORRs) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02-1.99, p < 0.001) and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.03-1.57, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis showed that the OR of grade 3 or higher AEs for immunotherapy plus chemotherapy was higher than that of chemotherapy alone, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061) , and there was PFS and OS benefit for either immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, double agent immunotherapy or immunotherapy plus targeted plus chemotherapy combination regimens. CONCLUSIONS Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed more clinical benefit for patients with NSCLC, with increased grade 3 or higher AEs, but toxicities were manageable.

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are available for first- and further lines of treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These treatments are associated with adverse events called immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). The incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of IRAEs are quite acknowledged; however, the link between IRAEs and the efficacy of ICIs requires further clarification. The objectives of this study were to assess the association between IRAEs incidence and severity and ICIs efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS In this retrospective study, clinical, biological, treatment, and outcome data were collected from patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least 1 cycle of ICIs from April 2013 to February 2017. The primary endpoint was to assess the association of IRAEs incidence with overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the association of IRAEs with progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS Overall, 270 patients were studied. The median OS was 14 months, median PFS was 2.6 months, ORR was 13%, and DCR was 51%. OS, PFS, and ORR were significantly better for patients with IRAEs compared with patients with no IRAEs, translating to median OS not reached versus 8.21 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.46; P < .001); PFS was 5.2 versus 1.97 months (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.32-0.57; P < .001); and ORR was 212.9% versus 5.7% (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.18-11.05; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This report presents the largest case series showing longer OS and PFS and better ORR when IRAEs occurred in a population of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs. The biological background for this phenomenon is being explored prospectively.

BACKGROUND Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly invasive and fatal, sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy but prone to relapse, with a poor overall survival rate. It is particularly urgent for SCLC patients to receive effective follow-up treatment. In the past 20 years, there has been no breakthrough in clinical treatment of SCLC. Currently, clinical studies on immunotherapy for SCLC with extensive stage disease (ED) have achieved good efficacy, bringing new hope for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. PD-1 inhibitors used to treat small cell lung cancer include Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab. PD-L1 inhibitors mainly include Atezolizumab and Durvalumab. Other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as Avelumab, are currently being tried for SCLC and the results have not yet been published. This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with ED SCLC. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were performed. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Four studies involving 1,981 patients with ED SCLC were included. Both overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) =0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.68, 0.95), P=0.009] and progression-free survival (PFS) [HR =0.82, 95% CI (0.75, 0.90), P<0.00001] were longer in the immunotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group. The incidence of total treatment-related adverse events in the immunotherapy group were lower than those in the chemotherapy group [relative risk (RR) =1.050, 95% CI (1.010, 1.080), P=0.007], and the differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Immunotherapy has better efficacy and safety than chemotherapy for the treatment of ED SCLC.

… the tumor microenvironment. In a separate cohort of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, … These important immune and clinical observations may influence future trials and …

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved cancer prognosis, but have not been evaluated specifically in sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC), a rare lung cancer subtype with poor prognosis. As such, our study sought to retrospectively assess the ICI efficacy in SC. METHODS All consecutive patients with centrally confirmed SC treated in ≥ second-line between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled. PD-L1 tumor expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry (SP263 clone), and the tumor mutational burden (TMB) with the Foundation One panel. TMB was considered high if ≥10 mutations/megabase (MMb). RESULTS Overall, 37 SC patients were evaluated, predominantly men (73%), median age of 63.2 years (36.8-79.7), current or former smokers (94.6%). Immunotherapy (Nivolumab 86.5% of cases) was given in second-line in 54% patients and third-line or beyond in 46%. The ORR was 40.5% and DCR 64.8%, regardless of PD-L1 status. Median OS was 12.7 months [range: 0.3-45.7]. One-third of patients exhibited early progression. The median PD-L1 expression was 70% [0-100]. There was a trend toward higher PD-L1 expression in responsive diseases, with an ORR of 58.8% in PD-L1+ patients and 0% in the single PD-L1- patient (p=0.44). The median TMB was 18 [4-39] MMb, 87.5% of cases displaying a high TMB. There was a trend towards higher TMB in responders versus stable or progressive diseases (p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS SC patients exhibited high response rates and prolonged OS under ICI treatment. These data support the prospective investigation of ICI in SC patients in first-line treatment.

Background We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and further estimated the value of PD-L1 expression in predicting the response from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Methods Clinical trial data were searched from electronic databases, which evaluated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and correlated with PD-L1 expression levels. Results Fifteen randomized-controlled trials involving 10,074 patients were identified. Comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy to chemotherapy, the pooled HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.85, P<0.00001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients had longer OS at ≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥50% PD-L1 expression levels. Patients with higher PD-L1 expression may get increased benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, patients with PD-L1 ≥50% had an objective response rate (ORR) improvement from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (RR =1.87, 95% CI: 1.27-2.75, P=0.001), but no ORR benefits were observed in patients with PD-L1 expression <1% (RR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.56-1.22, P=0.33) or 1-49% (RR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98, P=0.03). OS was significantly better in patients receiving second-or-third line treatments (P<0.00001) with PD-L1 ≥1%. The efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors was similar to that of PD-L1 inhibitors, with no significant difference (P=0.63, I2=0%). Furthermore, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy had better OS (HR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.84, P=0.001) than chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analyses showed that patients benefited from the combined chemo-IO treatment in the first-line setting regardless of PD-L1 expression level. Conclusions PD-L1 expression may be a valuable predictor of the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in certain NSCLC patients. However, the combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy significantly improved survival regardless of the PD-L1 expression level in the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Abstract Background Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells with or without immune cells is widely reported in clinical trials of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Various cutpoints have been studied. Methods We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings up to December 2019 for randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We retrieved data on objective response rate (ORR), 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 2-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) in various PD-L1 subgroups. Results were pooled and analyzed based on different cutpoints, with nonrandomized comparisons made with pooled chemotherapy outcomes. Results A total of 9810 patients in 27 studies were included. In treatment-naïve patients, benefits with PD-1 blockade over chemotherapy were seen in ORR in patients having PD-L1 50% or greater, in 2-year OS for PD-L1 1% or greater, and in 1-year PFS, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS for unselected patients. First-line PD-1 blockade compared with chemotherapy demonstrated higher ORR, 2-year PFS, and 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 50% or greater; lower ORR, higher 2-year PFS, and similar 3-year OS if PD-L1 was 1%-49%; and lower ORR, similar 1-year PFS, and lower 2-year OS if PD-L1 was less than 1%. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade demonstrated similar or superior outcomes to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups. Conclusions PD-L1 should guide the choice of PD-1 blockade vs chemotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. In previously treated patients, PD-1 blockade provides a favorable outcome profile to chemotherapy in all PD-L1 subgroups.

AIMS Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the approach to care of patients with lung cancer. An important issue that is not known is whether they benefit men and women the same. We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if clinical response and survival are influenced by gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed search was carried out to identify all randomised controlled trials evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) and whether there were differences in these outcomes between men and women. RESULTS In total, 12 studies with data for overall survival and 11 studies with data for PFS were included. Immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over chemotherapy for overall survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.81, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (pooled hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-0.72, P < 0.001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between men and women in terms of overall survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-0.83 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.82, P = 0.709) or progression-free survival (males versus females: pooled hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.53-0.75 versus pooled hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.88, P = 0.372). CONCLUSION This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effect of gender and response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in patients solely with NSCLC. We examined 9270 and 6193 patients in terms of overall survival and PFS, respectively. Although there are significant biological differences between men's and women's immune responses, we have shown that these drugs offer the same survival benefit in patients with NSCLC regardless of gender.

Treatment strategies for advanced NSCLC patients without driver molecular alterations are influenced by PD-L1 expression. If PD-L1 is <50%, the preferred upfront treatment is the association of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, while immunotherapy alone is an additional option if PD-L1 ≥ 50%. Both treatments demonstrated their superiority over chemotherapy in this subset of NSCLC patients, with comparable efficacy outcomes but less safety concerns for immunotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a significant difference in terms of early progression-free survival rate emerges by analyzing and comparing the survival curves of the two strategies, reflecting a non-negligible loss of patients due to early disease progression at 3 and 6 months from treatment initiation with immunotherapy alone as compared to its association with chemotherapy. We deeply analyzed efficacy similarities and differences of the two approaches in advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, trying to suggest clinical and biologic aspects to be considered when facing the treatment choice.

BACKGROUND Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is recognized as a key biomarker in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anti-PD(L)1 inhibitors. Previous work has highlighted that outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD(L)1 inhibitors generally improve with increasing PD-L1 expression. The objectives of these analyses are to quantitate the effect of PD-L1 expression on outcomes, to characterize the potentially nonlinear relationship between PD-L1 expression and outcomes, and to assess potential differences in these relationships across subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective, pooled analysis of 11 clinical trials submitted to the US FDA between 2015 and 2022 that included patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti-programmed death 1 or anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in the first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) treatment setting. The clinical outcomes explored were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS The primary analysis population included 3806 patients with advanced NSCLC, of which 2040 were treated in 1L and 1766 in 2L. For patients with a PD-L1 score of 100% in the 1L setting, the hazard ratio versus a patient with 1% PD-L1 was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.70) for OS and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.61) for PFS. For patients with a PD-L1 score of 100% in the 2L setting, the hazard ratio versus a patient with 0% PD-L1 was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.71) for OS and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.63) for PFS. Subgroup analyses suggested that this relationship may vary by subgroup, particularly by region. CONCLUSIONS These analyses suggest PD-L1 expression has an appreciable impact on clinical outcomes for patients with NSCLC treated with ICI. As the impact of PD-L1 expression on outcomes may vary across regions, it is critical that future trials are multiregional and enroll a diverse patient population.

Whether PD‐L1‐positive patients derive more overall survival benefit from PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced solid tumours is unclear. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases from January 1, 1966 to March 1, 2019, to identify randomised controlled trials of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab and avelumab) that had available hazard ratios (HRs) for death according to PD‐L1 status. A random‐effects model was used to calculate the pooled overall survival (OS) HR and 95% CI among PD‐L1‐positive and PD‐L1‐negative patients. An interaction test was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity between the two estimates. A total of 24 randomised trials, involving 12,966 participants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. An OS benefit of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors was found in both PD‐L1‐positive patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60–0.70) and PD‐L1‐negative patients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74–0.91) even at the minimum cut‐off value of 1%. Significant differences in the efficacy of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors between PD‐L1‐positive and PD‐L1‐negative patients were noted at different cut‐off values. Moreover, there was a positive dose–response relationship between PD‐L1 positivity and OS benefit (HR for 1%, 0.58, [0.50, 0.67]; 5%, 0.52 [0.43, 0.64]; 10%, 0.50 [0.40, 0.63]). Subgroup analyses showed that these results were generally consistent, regardless of study design, line of treatment, treatment type, tumour type, PD‐L1 staining cell type and median follow‐up time. We demonstrated that PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors significantly improved OS in both PD‐L1 positive and PD‐L1 negative patients compared to controls, but the magnitude of benefit was clinically PD‐L1‐dependent.

… Comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to docetaxel in second line treatment, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 0.75 (95% CI 0.62…

OBJECTIVES To evaluate serum tumor markers (STM) as biomarkers for treatment monitoring and prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with single-agent PD-1/PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were routinely measured at NSCLC diagnosis, initially elevated markers were used for follow-up. Leading STM change between ICI initiation and first subsequent restaging as well as corresponding computed tomography evaluations according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) were retrospectively analyzed regarding progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In uni- and multivariate stepwise Cox-regression analyses, STM and RECIST response were analyzed for their impact on PFS and OS together with other known prognostic patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Among 84 patients (61% men, mean age 68 years), median PFS was significantly (p < 0.001) longer, when STM decreased (11 M (7,19) N = 37) than in case of increases (<2-fold: 6 M (3,8) N = 31; ≥2-fold: 2 M (1,2) N = 16). Patients with initial STM decrease had longer (p < 0.001) median OS (not reached) than with STM increase (<2-fold: 14 M (12,26); ≥2-fold: 4 M (3,7)). Patients with stable or progressive disease by RECIST and concomitant STM decrease had longer (p < 0.001) PFS and OS (8 M (4,14) and 18 M (10,n.e.) N = 24) than upon STM increase (PFS: 2 M (2,4); OS: 10 M (6,13) N = 42). Significant impact on PFS was shown for STM response (p < 0.001), RECIST response (p = 0.003) and PD-L1 status (p = 0.003). For OS, STM response (p < 0.001), presence of cerebral metastases (p = 0.036) and therapy line ≥3 (p = 0.001) were identified. CONCLUSION Decreasing leading STM at first restaging predict longer PFS and OS and identify patients with favorable outcomes among initial radiological non-responders in ICI treated NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and others have shown potent clinical efficacy and have revolutionized the treatment protocols of a broad spectrum of tumor types, especially non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the substantial optimism of treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, there is still a large proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC who are resistant to the inhibitors. Preclinical and clinical trials have demonstrated that radiotherapy can induce a systemic antitumor immune response and have a great potential to sensitize refractory “cold” tumors to immunotherapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), as a novel radiotherapy modality that delivers higher doses to smaller target lesions, has shown favorable antitumor effects with significantly improved local and distant control as well as better survival benefits in various solid tumors. Notably, research has revealed that SBRT is superior to conventional radiotherapy, possibly because of its more powerful immune activation effects. Thus, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with SBRT instead of conventional radiotherapy might be more promising to fight against NSCLC, further achieving more favorable survival outcomes. In this review, we focus on the underlying mechanisms and recent advances of SBRT combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with an emphasis on some future challenges and directions that warrant further investigation.

BACKGROUND Among patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 70% occur in those above 65 years of age and more than half are metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC. METHODS Retrospective analyses pooling data across 4 randomized clinical trials comparing programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to docetaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with disease progression on or after a platinum-containing therapy were conducted. Demographics, efficacy, and safety data from these trials were pooled and aggregated based on age. The relative treatment effects on overall survival (OS) across age groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. A meta-analysis was performed comparing OS across age groups treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies compared with those treated with docetaxel, as a common control arm across trials. A Cox Proportional Hazards model, stratified by clinical trial, was used and a univariate and multivariate adjusted analysis of OS to further identify trends in efficacy across age groups. RESULTS Among patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies enrolled across the 4 clinical trials, 42% were >65 years of age, 99% had ECOG performance status of 0-1, 75% had received 1 prior therapy, and 76% were diagnosed with Stage IV disease. In the pooled analysis of 2,824 patients across both arms, the treatment effects in age-defined subgroups were similar, with a hazard ratios (HR), unadjusted or adjusted, for OS of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.80) in patients <65 years and 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) in patients ≥65 years of age. In patients ≥70 years, the HR for OS was 0.67 (0.55. 0.82) and in patients ≥ 75 years, the HR was 0.81 (0.58, 1.13). Estimated median OS in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies versus docetaxel was 14.5 months versus 8.8 months in patients <65 years, 14.2 months versus 9 months in patients ≥65 years, 14.1 versus 9.2 months in patients ≥70 years, and 14.7 versus 9.5 months in the patients ≥75years. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies were less frequent in patients ≥75 years (23%) compared to patients> 65 year ( 49%) and <65 years (47%), as were serious adverse events (30%, 32.5%, 15%); however, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment (7%, 7%, and 5%) in those subgroups ≤65 years, >65 years, and >75 years, respectively, were similar. CONCLUSIONS Patients 65 and older with advanced and metastatic NSCLC, including those ≥75 years, seem to derive similar survival benefits from treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies as patients <65 years of age. Patients 75 and older enrolled on these trials appear to tolerate PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies and have a lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events compared to the subgroup of patients <65 years of age.

INTRODUCTION There is unmet need to explore the predictive biomarkers of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we aimed to investigate the predictive and prognostic value of blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS We performed a comprehensive online search to explore the association between blood NLR and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Published data including hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were eligible. Pooled estimates of treatment outcomes were calculated using Stata/MP 14.1. RESULTS 1700 patients from sixteen studies were included. The pooled results suggested that high blood NLR was correlated with significantly shorter OS (HR = 2.07, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.59, P < 0.001). The predictive and prognostic significance of blood NLR were observed consistently across most subgroups including publication year, study design, research region, PD-L1 expression detection, sample size, NLR cutoff, median follow-up time and study quality score. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between elevated NLR cutoff values and OS benefit (r = 0.585, P =  0.036) but not for PFS benefit (r = 0.198, P =  0.496). Notably, HRs of PFS showed significant correlation with HRs of OS (r = 0.686, P =  0.041). CONCLUSION Elevated blood NLR was associated with shorter PFS and OS in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, suggesting its potential predictive and prognostic value in this clinical scenario.

BACKGROUND Programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a well-known predictive biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, however, its accuracy remains controversial. Here, we investigated the correlation between PD-L1 expression level and efficacy of its inhibitors, and hence assessed the predictive effect of PD-L1 expression. METHODS Studies that evaluated the efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC patients according to tumor PD-L1 expression levels were searched for on Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the objective response rate (ORR) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS 1432 NSCLC patients from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included and three PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) were used to treat the patients. A significantly higher ORR was observed in the high PD-L1 expression group compared to the low expression group (0.35 [95% CI, 0.30-0.40] vs 0.11 [95% CI, 0.09-0.14]). The results of the subgroup analysis, grouped by the type of drugs and antibodies which assess immune checkpoint inhibitors were identical with the pooled result. However, our study showed that PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic nor predictive of overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS PD-L1 can be a predictive biomarker for ORR. Nevertheless, PD-L1 expression is not a good predictive tool for OS and PFS.

… the PD-1 binding with its ligands 1 or 2 (PD-L1 or PD-… (PD-L1) expression as a predictive biomarker. The main objective of this study update is to assess the survival according to PD-L1 …

Abstract Objective To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. Review methods Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. Results 4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. Conclusions PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Introduction Alternative predictive end points for overall survival (OS), such as tumor response and progression‐free survival (PFS), are useful in the early detection of drug efficacy; however, they have not been fully investigated in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti–programmed death protein 1 (PD‐1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) antibodies. Methods In a systematic review of the reported prospective clinical trials, data for response rate, median PFS, and median OS were extracted from 12 arms in 10 reported clinical trials using anti–PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibody, and their correlation was investigated. In a retrospective analysis at our institution, OS was compared according to tumor response on 5‐ to 9‐week computed tomography scans and status of being progression‐free at 8, 16, and 24 weeks by landmark analysis in 71 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti–PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies between 2013 and 2015. Results In a systematic review, moderate correlations between median OS and median PFS (p = 0.120, r = 0.473) and between median OS and response rate (p = 0.141, r = 0.452) were identified using the Spearman correlation coefficient, although these correlations were not statistically significant. In a retrospective analysis of patients treated at our institution, disease control (partial response [PR]/stable disease versus progressive disease/not evaluable), and progression‐free status at 8, 16, and 24 weeks significantly predicted OS (Cox proportional hazards model, PR/stable disease versus progressive disease/not evaluable, p = 0.0104, HR = 3.041; 8‐week progression‐free yes versus no, p = 0.0183, HR = 2.684; 16‐week progression‐free yes versus no, p = 0.0036, HR = 4.009; and 24‐week progression‐free yes versus no, p = 0.0002, HR = 12.726). Conclusions Both disease control (PR plus stable disease status) and landmark progression‐free survival were correlated with OS, with the longer interval landmark PFS being the best predictor of survival in patients with NSCLC treated with anti–PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies.

Background Immunotherapy can become a crucial therapeutic option to improve prognosis for lung cancer patients. First clinical trials with therapies targeting the programmed cell death receptor PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 have shown promising results in several solid tumors. However, in lung cancer the diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value of these immunologic factors remains unclear. Method The impact of both factors was evaluated in a study collective of 321 clinically well-annotated patients with non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) using immunohistochemistry. Results PD-1 expression by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was found in 22%, whereas tumor cell associated PD-L1 expression was observed in 24% of the NSCLC tumors. In Fisher’s exact test a positive correlation was found for PD-L1 and Bcl-xl protein expression (p = 0.013). Interestingly, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was associated with improved overall survival in pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas (SCC, p = 0.042, log rank test), with adjuvant therapy (p = 0.017), with increased tumor size (pT2-4, p = 0.039) and with positive lymph node status (pN1-3, p = 0.010). These observations were confirmed by multivariate cox regression models. Conclusion One major finding of our study is the identification of a prognostic implication of PD-L1 in subsets of NSCLC patients with pulmonary SCC, with increased tumor size, with a positive lymph node status and NSCLC patients who received adjuvant therapies. This study provides first data for immune-context related risk stratification of NSCLC patients. Further studies are necessary both to confirm this observation and to evaluate the predictive value of PD-1 and PD-L1 in NSCLC in the context of PD-1 inhibition.

Lung cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer-related death in worldwide, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all lung cancers. Surgery, platinum-based chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents and radiotherapy are the main treatment of NSCLC. With the strategies of treatment constantly improving, the prognosis of NSCLC patients is not as good as before, new sort of treatments are needed to be exploited. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 play a key role in tumor immune escape and the formation of tumor microenvironment, closely related with tumor generation and development. Blockading the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway could reverse the tumor microenvironment and enhance the endogenous antitumor immune responses. Utilizing the PD-1 and/or PD-L1 inhibitors has shown benefits in clinical trials of NSCLC. In this review, we discuss the basic principle of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and its role in the tumorigenesis and development of NSCLC. The clinical development of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors and the main problems in the present studies and the research direction in the future will also be discussed.

Tumors may adopt normal physiologic checkpoints for immunomodulation leading to an imbalance between tumor growth and host surveillance. Antibodies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint have shown dynamic and durable tumor regressions, suggesting a rebalancing of the host-tumor interaction. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the anti-PD-1 antibodies that are currently the furthest in clinical development, and anti-PD-L1 agents under investigation include MPDL3280A, MEDI4736, and BMS-936559. These agents have been used to treat advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma, amongst other tumor types. In this article, we review the updated response results for early clinical trials, note recent FDA actions regarding this class of agents, and summarize results across trials looking at PD-L1 status as a predictor of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1.

… This study demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) with nivolumab (median 9.2 months) … The median progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the nivolumab group (3.5 months …

Monoclonal antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) are effective therapies in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, the authors performed a systematic review investigating differences in the toxicities of PD‐1 and PD‐L1 inhibitors.

… CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 inhibitory pathways, killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR ) inhibition, … durable overall radiological response rates in the 20% to 25% range in lung cancer. This …

Cancer immunotherapies, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have reshaped the treatment paradigm for both advanced non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Programmed death receptor-1/programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) are some of the most common and promising targets in ICIs. Compared to ICI monotherapy, which occasionally demonstrates treatment resistance and limited efficacy, the dual blockade immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 operates at different stages of T cell activation with synergistically enhancing immune responses against cancer cells. This emerging dual therapy heralds a new direction for cancer immunotherapy, which, however, may increase the risk of drug-related adverse reactions while improving efficacy. Previous clinical trials have explored combination therapy strategy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents in lung cancer, yet its efficacy remains to be unclear with the inevitable incidence of immune-related adverse events. The recent advent of bispecific antibodies has made this sort of dual targeting more feasible, aiming to alleviate toxicity without compromising efficacy. Thus, this review highlights the role of dual blockade immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in treating lung cancer, and further elucidates its pre-clinical mechanisms and current advancements in clinical trials. Besides, we also provide novel insights into the potential combinations of dual blockade therapies with other strategies to optimize the future treatment mode for lung cancer.

… of immune responses. For example, the activation of CTLA-4 pathway via CTLA-4 receptor … CD80/86 on the dendritic cell, resulting in inhibition of the T cells. Therefore, blockade of the …

Focal radiation therapy enhances systemic responses to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in preclinical studies and in some patients with melanoma1–3, but its efficacy in inducing systemic responses (abscopal responses) against tumors unresponsive to CTLA-4 blockade remained uncertain. Radiation therapy promotes the activation of anti-tumor T cells, an effect dependent on type I interferon induction in the irradiated tumor4–6. The latter is essential for achieving abscopal responses in murine cancers6. The mechanisms underlying abscopal responses in patients treated with radiation therapy and CTLA-4 blockade remain unclear. Here we report that radiation therapy and CTLA-4 blockade induced systemic anti-tumor T cells in chemo-refractory metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where anti-CTLA-4 antibodies had failed to demonstrate significant efficacy alone or in combination with chemotherapy7,8. Objective responses were observed in 18% of enrolled patients, and 31% had disease control. Increased serum interferon-β after radiation and early dynamic changes of blood T cell clones were the strongest response predictors, confirming preclinical mechanistic data. Functional analysis in one responding patient showed the rapid in vivo expansion of CD8 T cells recognizing a neoantigen encoded in a gene upregulated by radiation, supporting the hypothesis that one explanation for the abscopal response is radiation-induced exposure of immunogenic mutations to the immune system. Radiotherapy-induced abscopal responses enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

… the addition of anti-CTLA-4 increases the durability of treatment response despite not improving radiological response rates. Specifically, the benefit of anti-CTLA-4 was driven mostly by …

Formenti et al. have recently reported the clinical outcomes and translational readouts of a trial of the anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor, ipilimumab, in combination with palliative radiotherapy in 39 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. A radiological response was seen in 18% of patients and 31% of patients experienced disease control. These clinical outcomes appear to be superior to historical studies using ipilimumab alone and suggest that radiation may have triggered systemic, so-called abscopal, immune responses in some patients. Induction of interferon-beta (IFN-β) and maximal expansion and contraction of distinct T cell receptor clones were the most significant factors predicting response. Importantly, established predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy alone, including the expression of PD-L1 in diagnostic biopsies and tumour mutational burden, did not predict response. The report provides important human qualification of pre-clinical mechanistic insights indicating that abscopal responses can be generated with optimised radiotherapy fractionation schedules and anti-CTLA-4 inhibition. Additionally, an intriguing mechanism by which radiation can be immunogenic is described, namely radiation-induced transcriptional upregulation of neo-antigens.

Immunotherapy is among the most rapidly evolving treatment strategies in oncology. The therapeutic potential of immune-checkpoint inhibitors is exemplified by the recent hail of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for their use in various malignancies. Continued efforts to enhance outcomes with immunotherapy agents have led to the formulation of advanced treatment strategies. Recent evidence from pre-clinical studies evaluating immune-checkpoint inhibitors in various cancer cell-lines has suggested that combinatorial approaches may have superior survival outcomes compared to single-agent immunotherapy regimens. Preliminary trials assessing combination therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 immune-checkpoint inhibitors have documented considerable advantages in survival indices over single-agent immunotherapy. The therapeutic potential of combinatorial approaches is highlighted by the recent FDA approval of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with advanced melanoma. Presently, dual-immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-programmed death receptor-1/programmed cell death receptor- ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) is being evaluated for a wide range of tumor histologies. Furthermore, several ongoing clinical trials are investigating combination checkpoint inhibition in association with traditional treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of combination therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4 MoAbs for patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present a synopsis of the prospects for expanding the indications of dual immune-checkpoint inhibition therapy to a more diverse set of tumor histologies.

Introduction The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor with CTLA-4 inhibitor for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) is presently a significant area of research, however its clinical application remains contentious. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in combination with CTLA-4 inhibitor (CP) in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods A systemic search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, and Web of Science) from their establishment until January 17, 2024, for randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of the first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CTLA-4 inhibitor in patients with advanced NSCLC. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were subjected to meta-analyses. Results Totally 7 eligible randomized controlled trials including 4682 people were included. Two comparative analyses were performed: CP versus chemotherapy, CP versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (P). Compared with the chemotherapy group, CP improved OS (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.94, p<0.05) but not PFS (HR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.73-1.20, p = 0.63) or ORR (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.79-1.71, p = 0.45). In terms of toxicity, CP had slightly fewer any AEs compared to chemotherapy (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.97; p<0.05). Compared to the P group, there was no significant difference in OS (MD: -0,25, 95% CI: -2.47-1.98, p = 0.83), PFS (MD: -0.91, 95% CI: -3.19-1.36, p = 0.43), and ORR (OR:1.05, 95% CI. 0.80-1.36, p = 0.73). Subgroup analysis revealed that CP provided superior OS compared with P in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1%. Conclusion CP was a feasible and safe first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. Specifically, CP may function as a therapeutic alternative for individuals with low or negative PD-L1 expression, resulting in enhanced long-term outcomes compared to chemotherapy or P. Further randomized controlled trials with prolonged follow-up periods are necessary to validate these results, particularly focusing on efficacy in patients with differing PD-L1 expression levels, to improve the stratified implementation of immunotherapy. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024621116, identifier CRD42024621116.

For patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received frontline immunochemotherapy, subsequent treatment options are limited. As the first dual programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4 bispecific antibody approved globally, cadonilimab demonstrated potential antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients resistant to anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibodies.

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab (anti PD-1 and CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) in patients with previously treated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS In this multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study, patients with previously treated NSCLC were enrolled in three different cohorts: Cohort A, patients who had failed previous platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and were immunotherapy naïve; Cohort B, patients who had failed previous platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and had primary resistance to immunotherapy (IO); Cohort C, patients who had failed previous platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and had acquired resistance to IO. Eligible patients were given cadonilimab 6 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS A total of 53 patients were enrolled: including 30 patients in cohort A, 7 in cohort B, and 16 in cohort C. ORR was 10% in cohort A, and there were no responder in cohort B and cohort C. Median overall survival was 19.61 (95% CI 11.30-NE) months, 4.93 (95% CI 1.97-NE) months and 13.16 (95% CI 6.18-NE) months in cohort A, B and C, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 6 (11.3 %) patients, including alanine aminotransferase increased (1.9%), rash (1.9%), chest discomfort (1.9%), hypercalcaemia (1.9%), anaemia (1.9%) and infusion related reaction (1.9%). CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary endpoint. Cadonilimab demonstrated limited efficacy in patients with IO failure, especially in cases of primary resistance. However, cadonilimab might play a role as a second-line immune monotherapy after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy failure and IO naïve, as its efficacy is similar to other immune checkpoint inhibitors after first-line chemotherapy. Cadonilimab was well-tolerated with mild toxicity, making it a potential candidate for the combination strategy. Clinical trial number NCT04172454.

Targeting checkpoints of immune cell activation has been demonstrated to be the most effective approach for activation of anti-tumor immune responses. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), both inhibitory checkpoints commonly seen on activated T-cells have been found to be the most reliable targets for the treatment of cancer. Six drugs targeting PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 and one drug targeting CTLA-4 have been approved for treatment of different types of cancers and several others are in advanced stages of development. The drugs when administered as monotherapy had dramatic increase in durable response rates and had manageable safety profile, but more than 50% of patients failed to respond to treatment. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockers was then evaluated to increase the response rates in patients, and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) plus nivolumab (anti-PD-1) combination was shown to significantly enhance efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Subsequently, ipilimumab plus nivolumab was approved for treatment of metastatic melanoma, advanced renal cell carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer with MMR/MSI-H aberrations. The success of combination encouraged multiple clinical studies in other cancer types. Efficacy of the combination has been shown in a number of published studies and is under evaluation in multiple ongoing studies. This review aims to support future research in combination immunotherapy by discussing the basic details of CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways and the results from clinical studies that evaluated combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockers.

… experience durable responses to PD-1 pathway inhibition. As a … strategies to potentiate anti-cancer immune responses. … cell lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor, in combination with …

Purpose: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a potential predictive biomarker for clinical response to ICI therapy, but whether TMB also predicts toxicity remains unknown. We investigated the relationship between TMB, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity for ICI therapy across multiple cancer types. Experimental Design: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and ASCO/ESMO/AACR meetings for clinical trials of anti-PD(L)1, CTLA-4, or combination in 29 cancer types. We assessed ICI administered, responses (complete or partial response), median OS, OS HR, and grade 3/4 toxicity. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression using tumor level TMB data from Foundation Medicine. Results: One hundred seventeen clinical trials, which included 12,450 patients treated with ICI therapy were analyzed. Meta-regression analysis revealed that TMB was significantly associated with ORR for anti-PD(L)1, anti–CTLA-4, and combination (P < 0.0001 for all), but not associated with toxicity in all treatment groups. OS data were unavailable for most studies included in our meta-analysis, and the relationship between TMB and OS in this subset was not significant (P = 0.26). In high TMB tumor types (≥10 mut/megabase) the improvement of ORR and increase in grade 3/4 toxicity with combination ICI therapy as compared with PD(L)1 monotherapy were 21.13% and 25.41%, respectively, as compared with 3.73% and 18.78% in low TMB tumor types (<10 mut/megabase). Conclusions: There is a positive association between TMB and clinical response with anti-PD(L)1, anti–CTLA-4, and combination ICIs, but no association between TMB and toxicity. These results imply a favorable risk/benefit ratio for ICIs in tumors with a higher TMB.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) is expressed on the surface of activated T cells and some tumor cells, and is the target of the clinically-approved monoclonal antibody ipilimumab. In this study, we investigate specific binding of radiolabeled ipilimumab to CTLA-4 expressed by human non-small cell lung cancer cells in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). Ipilimumab was radiolabeled with 64Cu (t1/2 = 12.7 h) through the use of the chelator 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) to formulate 64Cu-DOTA-ipilimumab. CTLA-4 expression in three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (A549, H460, and H358) was verified and quantified by Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). A receptor binding assay was utilized to monitor the binding and internalization of 64Cu-DOTA-ipilimumab in the NSCLC cell lines. Next, the biodistribution of 64Cu-DOTA-ipilimumab was mapped by longitudinal PET imaging up to 48 h after injection. Ex vivo biodistribution and histological studies were employed to verify PET results. By in vitro analysis, CTLA-4 was found to be expressed on all three NSCLC cell lines with A549 and H358 showing the highest and lowest level of expression, respectively. PET imaging and quantification verified these findings as the tracer accumulated highest in the A549 tumor model (9.80 ± 0.22 %ID/g at 48 h after injection; n=4), followed by H460 and H358 tumors with uptakes of 9.37 ± 0.26 %ID/g and 7.43 ± 0.05 %ID/g, respectively (n=4). The specificity of the tracer was verified by injecting excess ipilimumab in A549 tumor-bearing mice, which decreased tracer uptake to 6.90 ± 0.51 %ID/g at 48 after injection (n=4). Ex vivo analysis following the last imaging session also corroborated these findings. 64Cu-DOTA-ipilimumab showed enhanced and persistent accumulation in CTLA-4-expressing tissues, which will enable researchers further insight into CTLA-4 targeted therapies in the future.

… a new treatment modality in cancer. The most success has been achieved with the class of checkpoint inhibitors (… , numerous clinical trials are being conducted investigating CPIs in lung …

… -stage small cell lung cancer. An increasing number of clinical trials are also ongoing to … in patients with early-stage lung cancer as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Although PD-L1 …

A proportion of patients with lung cancer experience long-term clinical benefit with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, most patients develop disease progression during treatment or after treatment discontinuation. Definitions of immune resistance are heterogeneous according to different clinical and biologic features. Primary resistance and acquired resistance, related to tumor-intrinsic and tumor-extrinsic mechanisms, are identified according to previous response patterns and timing of occurrence. The clinical resistance patterns determine differential clinical approaches. To date, several combination therapies are under development to delay or prevent the occurrence of resistance to ICIs, including the blockade of immune coinhibitory signals, the activation of those with costimulatory functions, the modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and the targeting T-cell priming. Tailoring the specific treatments with distinctive biologic resistance mechanisms would be ideal to improve the design and results of clinical trial. In this review, we reviewed the available evidence on immune resistance mechanisms, clinical definitions, and management of resistance to ICIs in lung cancer. We also reviewed data on novel strategies under investigation in this setting.

Immunotherapy has emerged as a hot topic in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with remarkable success. Compared to chemotherapy patients, the 5-year survival rate for immunotherapy patients is 3-fold higher, approximately 4%–5% versus 15%–16%, respectively. Immunotherapies include chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, tumor vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and so forth. Among them, immune checkpoint inhibitors are in the spotlight. Common immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) currently in clinical use include programmed death receptor-1(PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4(CTLA-4). This article focuses on monotherapy and combination therapy of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. In particular, the combination therapy of ICIs includes the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy, the combination therapy of dual ICIs, the combination of ICIs and anti-angiogenic drugs, the combination of ICIs and radiotherapy, and the combination of ICIs inhibitors and tumor vaccines and so forth. This article focuses on the combination therapy of ICIs with chemotherapy, the combination therapy of dual ICIs, and the combination therapy of ICIs with anti-angiogenic drugs. The efficacy and safety of ICIs as single agents in NSCLC have been demonstrated in many trials. However, ICIs plus chemotherapy regimens offer significant advantages in the treatment of NSCLC with little to no dramatic increase in toxicity, while combined dual ICIs significantly reduce the adverse effects (AEs) of chemotherapy. ICIs plus anti-angiogenic agents regimen improves anti-tumor activity and safety and is expected to be the new paradigm for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Despite some limitations, these agents have achieved better overall survival rates. In this article, we review the current status and progress of research on ICIs in NSCLC in recent years, aiming to better guide the individualized treatment of NSCLC patients.

… We added 11 randomized clinical trials submitted from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2016, 15 -18,40 -46 to the original pooled analysis for a total of 25 unique …

Radiotherapy exerts immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects, both locally, within the irradiated tumour microenvironment, and systemically, outside the radiation field. Inspired by preclinical data that showed synergy between radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, multiple clinical trials were initiated with the hypothesis that combined treatment with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate a robust systemic immune response and improve clinical outcomes. However, despite early optimism, radioimmunotherapy trials in the curative and metastatic settings have met with little success. In this Review, we summarise the immunostimulatory effects of radiotherapy that provided the theoretical basis for trials of combination radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also discuss findings from clinical trials incorporating radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors and examine the success of these trials in the context of the immunosuppressive effects of radiotherapy. We conclude by highlighting targets for relieving radiotherapy-induced immunosuppression with the goal of enhancing the combined effects of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Importance High body mass index (BMI) is independently associated with overall survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with melanoma, yet whether BMI is associated with outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab remains unknown. Objective To examine whether BMI is associated with survival outcomes and adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with atezolizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants A pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from 4 international, multicenter clinical trials was performed. Two were single-arm phase 2 trials (BIRCH [data cutoff of May 28, 2015] and FIR [data cutoff of January 7, 2015]), and 2 were 2-arm randomized clinical trials (POPLAR [phase 2; data cutoff of May 8, 2015] and OAK [phase 3; data cutoff of July 7, 2016]). Patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated or treated with at least 1 line of systemic therapy, with measurable disease and good organ function and without contraindications for chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, were included in these trials. Data analyses were performed from February 28, 2019, to September 30, 2019. Interventions The control group was treated with docetaxel once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred in POPLAR and OAK. The experimental group was treated with atezolizumab once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred in all available trials. Main Outcomes and Measures Association between BMI and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Results Adequate data were available for 2110 patients from a total pool of 2261 across 4 trials. Of those 2110, 1434 patients (median age, 64 years [range, 57-70 years]; 890 men [62%]) received atezolizumab and 676 patients (median age, 63 years[range, 57-69 years]; 419 men [62%]) received docetaxel. There was a linear association between increasing BMI and OS in patients treated with atezolizumab. Obesity (BMI ≥30 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) was associated with significantly improved OS in patients treated with atezolizumab, but not in those who received docetaxel after adjusting for confounding variables. The association between BMI and OS/PFS was the strongest in the high PD-L1 expression subgroup. Overall survival for patients with the highest category of PD-L1 expression (≥50% of tumor cells or ≥10% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells; n = 436) had hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.21-0.62) for the group with obesity and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.48-0.98) for the group with overweight. Patients with the highest category of PD-L1 expression had PFS hazard ratios of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49-0.94) for the group with obesity and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.92) for the group with overweight. Treatment-related adverse events were not associated with BMI. Conclusions and Relevance High BMI appears to be independently associated with improved survival with atezolizumab in patients with NSCLC, raising the possibility that baseline BMI should be considered as a stratification factor in future immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy trials.

e15110 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yield remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of cancer. With the increasing use of ICI therapies, the dissemination of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) data is essential. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of onset and resolution of ICI-induced irAEs in cancer. Methods: Phase II–III clinical trials with single or multiple arms studying ICI-based treatments in cancer published between January 2007 and December 2019 were included. The pooled median time to onset (PMT-O), resolution (PMT-R), and immune-modulation resolution (PMT-IMR) of irAEs were analyzed based on irAE categories and severity grades using the metamedian package of the R software. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different ICI drugs, ICI doses, and cancer types. Results: Twenty-two eligible studies involving 23 clinical trials and 8,436 patients were included. On average, irAEs occurred at 6.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.7–7.4) after the initial ICI-based treatment. The first four irAEs with the shortest PMT-O were hypersensitivity/infusion reaction (3.1 weeks), neurological (4.0 weeks), skin (4.1 weeks), and gastrointestinal (6.1 weeks) events. IrAEs were resolved within 4.5 weeks (95% CI, 4.0–6.1), with the shortest and longest PMT-R for hypersensitivity/infusion reaction (0.1 weeks) and endocrine events (28.7 weeks), respectively. The application of immune-modulation drugs prolonged the general resolution time to 5.9 weeks, with the shortest and longest PMT-IMR for hypersensitivity/infusion reaction (0.2 weeks) and endocrine events (56.6 weeks), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 irAEs showed a significantly longer PMT-O (7.9 vs. 6.1 weeks; P &lt; 0.01) compared with all grade irAEs. Nivolumab + ipilimumab had a significantly shorter PMT-O than nivolumab alone (6.0 vs. 8.2 weeks; P &lt; 0.01). A significantly shorter PMT-O was observed for lung cancer compared with that for melanoma (4.7 vs. 6.1 weeks; P = 0.02). Conclusions: This study revealed the pattern and kinetics of the time to onset and resolution of irAEs in pan-cancers, which will promote the comprehensive understanding, timely detection, and effective management of ICI-induced irAEs.

… least in well-vascularized organs such as the lungs or liver 96,97,98,99 . In a detailed analysis of 165 individual lung metastases from patients with breast cancer, CRC or RCC, >70% of …

This review summarizes the developmental process of immunotherapy in lung cancer, ongoing international and domestic clinical trials in the field, and the challenges related to immunotherapy in the lung cancer patient population in China. The goal is to provide detailed information for future immunotherapy‐related clinical trials in China.

… Looking at cancer types tested in both anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy … trials, we found that lung cancer (254 trials), melanoma (139 trials), breast cancer (106 trials), lymphoma (99 trials) …

Checkpoint proteins are an integral part of the immune system and are used by the tumor cells to evade immune response, which helps them grow uncontrollably. By blocking these proteins, immune checkpoint inhibitors can restore the capability of the immune system to attack cancer cells and stop their growth. These findings are backed by adequate clinical trial data and presently, several FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors exist in the market for treating various types of cancers, including melanoma, hepatocellular, endometrial, lung, kidney and others. Their mode of action is inhibition by targeting the checkpoint proteins CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, etc. They can be used alone as well as in amalgamation with other cancer treatments, like surgery, radiation or chemotherapy. Since these drugs target only specific immune system proteins, their side effects are reduced in comparison with the traditional chemotherapy drugs, but may still cause a few affects like fatigue, skin rashes, and fever. In rare cases, these inhibitors are known to have caused more serious side effects, such as cardiotoxicity, and inflammation in the intestines or lungs. Herein, we provide an overview of these inhibitors and their role as biomarkers, immune-related adverse outcomes and clinical studies in the treatment of various cancers, as well as present some future perspectives.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including those targeting the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 pathways, are revolutionizing cancer therapeutics. Both activity and toxicities largely stem from unleashing tumor‐ or host‐specific cytotoxic T cells. Many patients seen in routine clinical practice have not qualified for or have been seriously underrepresented in immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials. Thus, a major gap in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of these agents persists in many populations, even after regulatory approval. To address this challenge, this review aggregates and synthesizes the available preclinical and clinical data surrounding immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in challenging clinical populations to assist both academic and community oncologists in treatment decision making. Specifically, this review focuses on the safety and activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with autoimmune disorders, organ transplant patients, patients with chronic viral infections, patients with ongoing immunosuppressant use, patients with organ dysfunction, pregnant patients, patients with brain metastases, patients at extremes of age, and patients with an impaired functional status. Cancer 2017;123:1904–1911. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

… inhibition in the early stages of melanoma and other cancers, such as breast, bladder, head and neck, lung and colon cancer, may be more effective when the drug is administered …

… -small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, … understanding of the exposure–response relationships for efficacy [… of pharmacokinetics, exposure–response of ICIs, …

previously presented at the 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 19th World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC), Toronto, ON. September 23–26, 2018. Funding: This study was supported by the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation (NBL: OSI Pharmaceuticals Foundation Chair).

Abstract Immunotherapy plays a central role in the treatment of NSCLC and biomarkers predicting response to ICIs are valuable therapeutic tools. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is integral in therapy selection as its positive predictive nature to ICIs in the metastatic setting is well documented. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has undergone much study and, while results are somewhat mixed, there is evidence for its positive predictive value with ICI use. Additional markers such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), gene expression profiling (GEP), mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI), somatic mutations, neutrophil to leukocyte ratio (NLR), smoking history, medication history, and immune-related adverse event (irAE) development can further guide clinicians.

Monoclonal antibodies that target immune checkpoint proteins, so-called immune checkpoint inhibitors, prevent tumor evasion of the immune system and are often effective in the treatment of lung cancer. Studies have demonstrated improved objective response rates, progression free survival, and overall survival with immune checkpoint inhibitors when used in both first and subsequent-line settings. Unfortunately, only a subset of unselected lung cancer patients responds to these therapies. An important area of ongoing research is to identify biomarkers that can predict which patients are most likely to derive clinical benefit. This review will discuss established and emerging biomarkers from some of the clinical trials that have demonstrated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of both non-small cell and small cell lung cancer.

Simple Summary Immunotherapy and, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have transformed non-small cell lung cancer treatment options. Although many patients are treated with ICIs, a large number do not respond. Thus, there is a need to identify biomarkers of response. In this study, we evaluated the value of multiple routinely collected variables (from metastatic sites to levels of several conventional peripheral blood parameters) as biomarkers of response to ICIs. Our data indicates that, although several characteristics are associated with response, many present strong interrelations, which should be taken into account when creating compendiums of biomarkers to maximize their predictivity. Finally, we describe a collection of characteristics (LDH levels, sex, and presence or absence of immune related adverse events) that, in our group of patients, had the best predictive value. Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Unfortunately, only some patients benefit from these therapies. Thus, certain clinicopathological characteristics of the patients have been proposed as biomarkers of ICIs response. We assembled a retrospective cohort of 262 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, compiled relevant clinicopathological characteristics, and studied their associations with treatment outcome using Cox proportional-hazards survival models. Additionally, we investigated the interrelations between clinicopathological features and devised a method to create a compendium associated with ICIs response by selecting those that provide non-redundant information. In multivariate analyses, ECOG performance status (hazard ratio (HR) 1.37 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.68), p < 0.005), LDH (HR 1.24 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.48), p = 0.02)) and PD-L1 negativity were associated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.58), p = 0.04), whereas presentation of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.55, p < 0.005) or females (HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.80, p < 0.005) had longer PFS. Additionally, numerous clinicopathological indicators were found to be interrelated. Thus, we searched for features that provide non-redundant information, and found the combination of LDH levels, irAEs, and gender to have a better association with ICIs treatment response (cross-validated c-index = 0.66). We concluded that several clinicopathological features showed prognostic value in our real-world cohort. However, some are interrelated, and compendiums of features should therefore consider these interactions. Joint assessment of LDH, irAEs, and gender may be a good prognostic compendium.

Simple Summary Lung cancer and in particular non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related death. The development of new therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy, has led to substantial improvement in survival time and quality of life. However, the clinical benefit of immunotherapy-based strategies is still limited to a minority of patients, reflecting the need to identify predictive biomarkers of response, which are any substance, structure, or process or its products that can be measured in the body and that can influence or predict clinical response. In this work, we provide an overview of the approved and the most promising investigational biomarkers, which have been assessed in vitro/ex vivo and in vivo, to identify patients who could benefit the most from immunotherapy-based treatment. Abstract Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death, and it is usually diagnosed in advanced stages (stage III or IV). Recently, the availability of targeted strategies and of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has favorably changed patient prognosis. Treatment outcome is closely related to tumor biology and interaction with the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). While the response in molecular targeted therapies relies on the presence of specific genetic alterations in tumor cells, accurate ICI biomarkers of response are lacking, and clinical outcome likely depends on multiple factors that are both host and tumor-related. This paper is an overview of the ongoing research on predictive factors both from in vitro/ex vivo analysis (ranging from conventional pathology to molecular biology) and in vivo analysis, where molecular imaging is showing an exponential growth and use due to technological advancements and to the new bioinformatics approaches applied to image analyses that allow the recovery of specific features in specific tumor subclones.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically shifted the therapeutic paradigm of extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC). Antibiotic (ATB) exposure before or during ICI therapy can harm the integrity of the gut microbiome and lead to intestinal dysbiosis, which has a profoundly negative impact on the treatment response for various malignancies. Whether this is applicable to ES‐SCLC remains unclear.

Abstract Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have produced remarkable responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, receivers still have a relatively low response rate. Initial response assessment by conventional imaging and evaluation criteria is often unable to identify whether patients can achieve durable clinical benefit from ICIs. Overall, there are sparse effective biomarkers identified to screen NSCLC patients responding to this therapy. A lot of studies have reported that patients with specific gene mutations may benefit from or resist to immunotherapy. However, the single gene mutation may be not effective enough to predict the benefit from immunotherapy for patients. With the advancement in sequencing technology, further studies indicate that many mutations often co-occur and suggest a drastic transformation of tumour microenvironment phenotype. Moreover, co-mutation events have been reported to synergise to activate or suppress signalling pathways of anti-tumour immune response, which also indicates a potential target for combining intervention. Thus, the different mutation profile (especially co-mutation) of patients may be an important concern for predicting or promoting the efficacy of ICIs. However, there is a lack of comprehensive knowledge of this field until now. Therefore, in this study, we reviewed and elaborated the value of cancer mutation profile in predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy and analysed the underlying mechanisms, to provide an alternative way for screening dominant groups, and thereby, optimising individualised therapy for NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy are now standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the benefits of combination vs sequential therapy have not been fully explored. Here, the authors analysed 1,133 patient records and show combination therapy showed increased protection against early progression, but similar overall survival. The role of combination chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (ICI-chemo) over ICI monotherapy (ICI-mono) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains underexplored. In this retrospective study of 1133 NSCLC patients, treatment with ICI-mono vs ICI-chemo associate with higher rates of early progression, but similar long-term progression-free and overall survival. Sequential vs concurrent ICI and chemotherapy have similar long-term survival, suggesting no synergism from combination therapy. Integrative modeling identified PD-L1, disease burden (Stage IVb; liver metastases), and STK11 and JAK2 alterations as features associate with a higher likelihood of early progression on ICI-mono. CDKN2A alterations associate with worse long-term outcomes in ICI-chemo patients. These results are validated in independent external ( n  = 89) and internal ( n  = 393) cohorts. This real-world study suggests that ICI-chemo may protect against early progression but does not influence overall survival, and nominates features that identify those patients at risk for early progression who may maximally benefit from ICI-chemo.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by activating the immune system, a mechanism that may also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study seeks to investigate on how different irAEs impact prognosis of advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and identify useful approaches to manage irAEs. Methods A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and manual searches up to January 2024 were undertaken. Treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were obtained. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.1). Results There were 106 studies with 41,050 advanced or recurrent LC patients included. The occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.59], OS (HR =0.57; 0.51–0.63), ORR [risk ratio (RR) =2.03; 95% CI: 1.81–2.28] and DCR (RR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.40–1.72) and remained significant after adjusting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. IrAEs affecting skin (OS: HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.38–0.53) and endocrine system (OS: HR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.41–0.62), of mild severity (OS: HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.35–0.79), arising in multiple sites (OS: HR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.38–0.59), induced by monotherapy (OS: HR =0.58; 95% CI: 0.52–0.65), with a delayed onset (cutoff: 3 months; OS: HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71) were identified as positive prognostic markers. In contrast, though pulmonary irAEs were found to be corelated with enhanced treatment response (ORR: RR =1.75; 95% CI: 1.37–2.25), they may harm survival, especially those with grade ≥3 (OS: HR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.39–4.14). Treatment resumption tended to improve PFS but might not reduce the risk of death compared to permanent discontinuation. Conclusions IrAEs suggest better treatment outcomes generally, yet severe pneumonia could increase mortality risk. Close supervision and appropriate handling protocols are warranted to weigh treatment benefit against risk.

Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), introducing a distinct spectrum of immune-related toxicities (irAEs). However, the real-world impact of irAEs and corticosteroid use on treatment outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study including patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy between April 2017 and December 2023. Clinical records were reviewed to collect data on irAEs and corticosteroid administration. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared according to irAE occurrence, grade, and corticosteroid use. Results: Among 452 patients, 151 (33.4%) experienced irAEs of any grade, and 37 (8.2%) developed grade ≥3 events. The most common irAEs were dermatologic (11.1%), endocrine disorders (9.1%), and arthritis (5.5%). Corticosteroids were administered for irAE management in 60 patients (13.3%). Patients who developed irAEs achieved significantly improved progression-free survival (median PFS: 23.2 vs. 4.2 months; HR = 0.29; p&amp;lt;0.001) and overall survival (median OS: 31.2 vs. 7.6 months; HR=0.35; p&amp;lt;0.001), including those with grade ≥3 events. The survival benefit associated with irAEs was not compromised by corticosteroid use for irAE management (median PFS 46.3 in irAE vs. 5.5 months in non-irAE/no use; HR=0.28; p&amp;lt;0.001). Temporary ICI discontinuation due to irAEs was associated with longer median PFS (39.1 vs. 5.6 months; HR=0.29; p&amp;lt;0.001), as was permanent ICI discontinuation due to irAEs (median not reached vs. 7.4 months; HR=0.20; p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusions: The occurrence of irAEs—and their management with corticosteroids—was independently associated with enhanced ICI efficacy in metastatic NSCLC, including among patients who developed high-grade toxicities and those who discontinued treatment due to toxicity.

Objective: To evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between men and women with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in second-line and later treatments. Methods: A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted on patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab) from January 2015 to December 2019 (with follow-up until December 2021). Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables were collected. OSand PFSwere analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between genders using the log-rank test.A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 189 patients were included, and 47 (25%) were women. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma (61%). Women began treatment at a younger age (59.8 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of active smoking (46.8% vs. 38%, p = 0.001). The median OS was similar between men (9.5 months, 95% CI: 7.1–11.8) and women (9.2 months, 95% CI: 3.3–15.2; p = 0.382) while PFS was significantly higher in males (3.2 months, 95% CI: 2.5–4.0) than in females (2.1 months; 95% CI = 1.6–2.5) (p = 0.002).Women had higher rates of tumor cachexia (BMI < 20).Worse PFS was observed for women both in the <20 kg/m2 (median PFS: 1.8 vs. 2.7 months, p = 0.016) and 20–24.9 kg/m2 groups (median PFS: 2.2 vs. 3.3 months, p = 0.077), while in patients with a BMI >= 25 kg/m2, median OS was higher in women than in men (14.7 months vs. 10.1 months). Women had also a significantly worse PFS than men among those with a cumulative tobacco consumption of <30 packs-year (median PFS: 2.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.038. In the multivariate analysis, the male sex was significantly associated with a better PFS(HR = 0.59; p = 0.009), without significant differences between sexes in OS (HR = 0.90; p = 0.618). Among the other variables analyzed, only an ECOG >= 2 was significantly associated with both worse OS (HR = 3.53; 95% CI = 1.93–6.47) and PFS (HR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.23–3.89). Women who discontinued due to toxicity (n = 7) had a median OS of 41.4 months (95% CI: 14.7–68.1) after discontinuation, whereas men (n = 15) had a median OS of 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.9–10.8), (p = 0.045). Conclusions: Sex-based differences were observed in the ICI outcomes. Women had worse PFS, particularly with lower BMI and lower tobacco exposure, despite similar OS between sexes. Women discontinued ICIs due to toxicity earlier but showed longer OS after discontinuation. Poor ECOG status was linked to worse outcomes across all the patients.

Objective: The aim of our review is to analyse sex-based differences in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients in terms of clinical-pathological and molecular features, focusing on their impact on immune response and outcome. Background: Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer mortality both in men and women worldwide. In the era of precision oncology, the idea of unleashing the host immune system against cancer through the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) radically shaped the therapeutic approach in the setting of non-oncogene addicted aNSCLC. Despite durable remissions and prolonged survival in a subset of patients, potential markers for individual prediction of immunotherapy effectiveness lacked high sensitivity and specificity. The selection of patients who could most benefit from single ICIs remains an unmet need, as well as the improvement of combination strategies for those one unresponsive or refractory to immunotherapy. Sex is a known variable that affects both innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as possibly clinical-pathological and molecular basis of LC. Although smoking is the primary risk factor for LC development in both men and women, other variable such as genetic differences, sex hormones, environmental exposures and lifestyle habit, immune system and tumor microenvironment (TME) disparities, could play an important role in sex-biased carcinogenesis and development of immune responses. Methods: An extended review of literature through PubMed was conducted, using the keywords related to patient sex (“sex”, “gender”, “male/female”, “men/women”) and NSCLC and LC epidemiological, etiological, clinical-pathological and molecular features. Conclusions: Women vs . men differences in terms of response to ICIs remain to date only suggestive, so further research, including prospective clinical trials, is warranted to establish sex as a factor in the therapeutic decision-making process. These findings about male vs. female immune

Emotional distress (ED), commonly characterized by symptoms of depression and/or anxiety, is prevalent in patients with cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that ED can impair antitumor immune responses, but few clinical studies have explored its relationship with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here we report results from cohort 1 of the prospective observational STRESS-LUNG study, which investigated the association between ED and clinical efficacy of first-line treatment of ICIs in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ED was assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. The study included 227 patients with 111 (48.9%) exhibiting ED who presented depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥5) and/or anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item score ≥5) symptoms at baseline. On the primary endpoint analysis, patients with baseline ED exhibited a significantly shorter median progression-free survival compared with those without ED (7.9 months versus 15.5 months, hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 2.43, P = 0.002). On the secondary endpoint analysis, ED was associated with lower objective response rate (46.8% versus 62.1%, odds ratio 0.54, P = 0.022), reduced 2-year overall survival rate of 46.5% versus 64.9% (hazard ratio for death 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.97, P = 0.016) and detriments in quality of life. The exploratory analysis indicated that the ED group showed elevated blood cortisol levels, which was associated with adverse survival outcomes. This study suggests that there is an association between ED and worse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with ICIs, highlighting the potential significance of addressing ED in cancer management. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05477979. In a prospective observational study, symptoms of anxiety and/or depression were associated with worse response to first-line treatment with immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

… of lung cancer patients receiving ICIs. Therefore, the effective mitigation of CIP onset and progression is pivotal to maximizing the clinical benefits of ICI therapy in this patient population. …

OBJECTIVES Immunotherapy (IO) is effective in metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Gut microbiota has an impact on immunity and its imbalance due to antibiotics may impair the efficacy of IO. We investigated this topic in a case series of NSCLC patients treated with IO. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data about all metastatic NSCLC patients treated with IO between 04/2013 and 01/2018 were collected. Patients were stratified according to antibiotic use during the Early IO Period (EIOP), and according to the Antibiotic-Immunotherapy Exposure Ratio (AIER) defined as "days of antibiotic/days of IO" during the Whole IO Period (WIOP). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the curves. Multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox model. RESULTS We analyzed 157 patients. Forty-six patients received antibiotics during the WIOP, 27 patients during the EIOP. No differences in either Progression-Free Survival (PFS) or Overall Survival (OS) were observed according to antibiotic use during the EIOP (p = 0.1772 and p = 0.2492, respectively). Considering the WIOP, median AIER was 4.2%. The patients with a higher AIER had worse PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p = 0.0004) than the others. Results were significant also after correction for the IO line (p = 0.0018 for PFS) and performance status (p < 0.0001 for PFS, p = 0.0052 for OS). CONCLUSION Although no difference in outcome were observed with antibiotic use in the EIOP, a detrimental effect became evident for patients with a higher AIER in the WIOP. If its relevance is confirmed, AIER may become an innovative variable for estimating the impact of antibiotics on IO efficacy.

… A closer relationship between ICIs and corticosteroids is defined by their immunosuppressive effects through counteraction on T cell activity [3] and disruption of homeostatic balance in …

Simple Summary Which factors predispose individuals to developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains unclear. In addition, the relationship between irAEs and survival outcomes warrants further investigation. We sought to investigate the association between immunotherapy-related thyroid dysfunction and demographic and clinical characteristics in a diverse urban cohort of patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study was conducted with the aim of helping to identify patients at a higher risk of experiencing irAEs and clarify whether irAEs portend a survival advantage. Abstract We sought to characterize thyroid dysfunction and its association with baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as progression-free survival (PFS), in a multiethnic cohort of lung cancer patients treated with ICIs. A retrospective chart review of lung cancer patients receiving an anti-PD1 or PD-L1 agent was performed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards were fitted to compare time to thyroid dysfunction among race subgroups controlling for age, gender, treatment type, and duration. Thyroid dysfunction was based on laboratory testing; clinical symptoms were not required. PFS at a 24-week landmark analysis point among patients with and without thyroid dysfunction was compared using a log-rank test. We identified 205 subjects that received ICIs, including 76 (37.1%) who developed thyroid dysfunction. Rates of thyroid dysfunction by one year occurred at similar frequencies among all races (p = 0.92). Gender and concurrent chemotherapy showed no significant association with thyroid dysfunction (p = 0.81 and p = 0.67, respectively). Thyrotoxicosis occurred at higher rates in Black (25, 31.6%) subjects than in White (7, 16.7%) and Hispanic (8, 12.7%) subjects when employing the log-rank test (p = 0.016) and multivariate Cox regression (HR 0.48, p = 0.09 for White and HR 0.36, p = 0.01 for Hispanic compared to Black subjects). PFS was similar among subjects with and without thyroid dysfunction when applying the log-rank test (p = 0.353). Gender, concurrent treatment with chemotherapy, and PFS were not associated with thyroid dysfunction in patients receiving ICIs; however, Black race was a risk factor for thyrotoxicosis. The mechanisms underlying the role of race in the development of irAEs warrant further study.

ABSTRACT Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become an important treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of pseudoprogression (PsP) and treatment beyond RECIST1.1-defined progressive disease (TBP) on outcome in NSCLC patients treated with ICI. Methods NSCLC patients treated with ICI between Mar 2016 and July 2018 were recruited in a consecutive manner. Response was assessed every 8–12 weeks using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST. Based on iRECIST, PsP was defined as progressive disease (PD) on RECIST1.1 subsequently reset to non-PD categories. Using log-rank test, progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between patients with and without PsP, and overall survival (OS) was compared between patients treated with and without TBP. The impact of TBP on OS was evaluated through multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results Of the 189 patients, seven (3.7%) experienced PsP which mostly occurred approximately 3 months after baseline. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients with PsP (not reached) than those without PsP (3.8 months, P = .02). Among patients who demonstrated PD according to RECIST1.1, median OS was significantly longer in patients with TBP (17.2 months) than those without TBP (7.4 months, P < .001). On multivariate analysis adjusting other covariates, TBP (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2–0.7) remained as a significant protective factor for mortality. Conclusion PsP occurred in 3.7% of NSCLC patients under ICI treatment. Based on iRECIST scheme, PsP and TBP may be associated with survival benefit.

Background Pseudoprogression (PsPD) is a rare response pattern to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in oncology. This study aims to reveal imaging features of PsPD, and their association to other relevant findings. Methods Patients with PsPD who had at least three consecutive cross-sectional imaging studies at our comprehensive cancer center were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response was assessed according to immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). PsPD was defined as the occurrence of immune unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) without follow-up confirmation. Target lesions (TL), non-target lesions (NTL), new lesions (NL) were analyzed over time. Tumor markers and immune-related adverse events (irAE) were correlated. Results Thirty-two patients were included (mean age: 66.7 ± 13.6 years, 21.9% female) with mean baseline STL of 69.7 mm ± 55.6 mm. PsPD was observed in twenty-six patients (81.3%) at FU1, and no cases occurred after FU4. Patients with iUPD exhibited the following: TL increase in twelve patients, (37.5%), NTL increase in seven patients (21.9%), NL appearance in six patients (18.8%), and combinations thereof in four patients (12.5%). The mean and maximum increase for first iUPD in sum of TL was 19.8 and 96.8 mm (+ 700.8%). The mean and maximum decrease in sum of TL between iUPD and consecutive follow-up was − 19.1 mm and − 114.8 mm (-60.9%) respectively. The mean and maximum sum of new TL at first iUPD timepoint were 7.6 and 82.0 mm respectively. In two patients (10.5%), tumor-specific serologic markers were elevated at first iUPD, while the rest were stable or decreased among the other PsPD cases (89.5%). In fourteen patients (43.8%), irAE were observed. Conclusions PsPD occurred most frequently at FU1 after initiation of ICI treatment. The two most prevalent reasons for PsPD were TL und NTL progression, with an increase in TL diameter commonly below + 100%. In few cases, PsPD was observed even if tumor markers were rising compared to baseline. Our findings also suggest a correlation between PsPD and irAE. These findings may guide decision-making of ICI continuation in suspected PsPD.

… Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with clinical benefit in lung cancer. However, … such response patterns in lung cancer, namely pseudoprogression and hyperprogression. …

ABSTRACT This study aimed to develop a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model capable of precisely predicting hyperprogression and pseudoprogression (PP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with NSCLC, from three institutions, treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and categorized them into training and independent testing set. Subsequently, we processed CT scans with a series of image-preprocessing techniques, and 6008 radiomic features capturing intra- and peritumoral texture patterns were extracted. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression model to select radiomic features and construct machine learning models. To further differentiate between progressive disease (PD) and hyperprogressive disease (HPD), we developed a new radiomics model. The logistic regression (LR) model showed optimal performance in distinguishing PP from HPD, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.99) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66-1) in the training and testing sets, respectively. Additionally, the support vector machine model showed optimal performance in distinguishing PD from HPD, with AUC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-1) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72-1) in the training and testing sets, respectively. Kaplan‒Meier survival curves showed clear stratification between PP predicted by the radiomics model and true progression (HPD and PD) (hazard ratio = 0.337, 95% CI: 0.200–0.568, p < 0.01) in overall survival. Our study demonstrates that radiomic features extracted from baseline CT scans are effective in predicting PP and HPD in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs.

… cases of pseudoprogression when the patients were evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and immune-… 41 patients with NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibition, two patients exhibited …

… progression with immune checkpoint blockade do not … that the effect of immune checkpoints blockade in PsPD patients is not … patterns of response (pseudoprogression) or progression (…

Introduction: Nivolumab is effective in the treatment of previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC. However, its radiological evaluation is challenging because of atypical patterns of response such as pseudoprogression. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of previously treated patients with NSCLC who were treated with nivolumab and experienced development of pseudoprogression. Methods: We conducted a 15‐center retrospective cohort study of previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab monotherapy. For the patients who showed pseudoprogression, we defined progression‐free survival 1 (PFS1) as the time to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors–defined first progressive disease and progression‐free survival 2 (PFS2) as the time to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors–defined second progressive disease or death. Results: Among the 542 patients included, 20% and 53% showed a typical response and progression, respectively. Of the 14 (3%) patients who showed pseudoprogression, most (n = 10) showed a response within 3 months of nivolumab treatment. The median PFS1 and PFS2 were 1.0 and 7.3 months, respectively. The median PFS2 was significantly shorter in the patients who showed pseudoprogression than the PFS of the patients with a typical response (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients showing pseudoprogression had significantly longer overall survival than did patients showing typical progression (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Pseudoprogression was uncommon, and the duration of response in patients who showed pseudoprogression was shorter than that in patients who showed a typical response. However, the survival benefit of pseudoprogression was markedly better than that of typical progression. Further research is required to elucidate the characteristics of and mechanisms underlying pseudoprogression.

Purpose Pseudo-progression (PsPD) is a rare phenomenon observed in <5% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This event is challenging for both clinicians and patients. Viable biomarkers to distinguish between PsPD and true progressive disease (TPD) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the correlation between PsPD and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy from December 2015 to October 2018 at Kobe University Hospital, Japan. Twenty-five patients were determined to have either PsPD (n =4) or TPD (n =21). We focused on longitudinal radiological images and NLRs. Results Here, we report four patients with PsPD. The pre- and post-treatment NLRs were significantly lower in patients with PsPD than in patients with TPD (p = 0.019 and p = 0.007, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic curve according to the pre- and post-treatment NLR showed areas under the curve of 0.82 and 0.94, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for pre- and post-treatment NLR were 4.1 and 3.2, respectively. The pre- and post-treatment NLRs were useful in distinguishing between PsPD and TPD. Both a pre-treatment NLR <4.1 and a post-treatment NLR <3.2 were significantly associated with longer overall survival compared to a pre-treatment NLR ≥4.1 (p < 0.001) and post-treatment NLR ≥3.2 (p = 0.004), respectively. Conclusion The NLR could be a viable clue for distinguishing between PsPD and TPD. Patients with a high post-treatment NLR in this study all had TPD, suggesting that these subjects should be considered for an early transition to the next drug treatment regimen.

Hyperprogression and pseudoprogression are two atypical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy that affect therapeutic decisions and prognosis. Identification of predictive biomarkers for atypical responses either before or during treatment remains a huge unmet need in cancer immunotherapy. Many studies have looked at potential biomarkers, including clinical factors and laboratory findings (e.g., peripheral blood counts, circulating tumor DNA, cytokine levels). The results of these studies have been inconsistent, possibly due to small sample sizes, different tumor types and heterogeneity of the definition of these atypical responses.

Background Pseudoprogression (PsP) in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) complicates treatment decisions. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of continuing versus discontinuing ICI post-PsP and developed tools for PsP identification via an individual patient data (IPD) pooled analysis. Methods This IPD pooled analysis included 40 PsP cases (4 institutional cases + 36 literature-derived cases, who were categorized into continued-ICI and interrupted-ICI groups. Prognoses were compared using Fisher’s exact test (12-month survival) and Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests (median overall survival). A chest computed tomography (CT) pattern diagram and proposed diagnostic-therapeutic framework were developed. Results The median time to PsP onset was 8 weeks. Initially, 87.5% of cases were misclassified as progressive disease (PD) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), whereas Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) corrected such misclassifications. Continued ICI treatment was associated with significantly longer median overall survival (16.6 vs. 7.4 months, P<0.01) and a higher 12-month survival rate (66.7% vs. 40.0%, P<0.01). To improve clinical recognition, we developed a chest CT pattern diagram delineating characteristic PsP imaging features. Additionally, a proposed diagnostic-therapeutic framework was developed to guide management, but it remains hypothesis-generating and requires validation. Conclusions Continuing ICIs post-PsP improves outcomes in lung cancer patients. iRECIST facilitates the accurate diagnosis of PsP, while chest CT pattern diagrams and a diagnostic-therapeutic framework contribute to optimizing the management of immunotherapy. Prospective trials are warranted to validate this framework.

The field of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is in constant evolution, given that combinatorial treatment strategies flank anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and disease settings beyond the advanced one derive benefit form immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). In this evolving scenario, the clinical experience derived from advanced NSCLC patients receiving single agent ICB will likely retain relevant meaning. In particular, treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 agents has been accompanied by the emergence of new patterns of clinico-radiological disease response, namely hyper-progression and pseudo-progression. Still harboring different prognostic implications, these two entities share some pathogenetic elements (both involving a dysregulated immune response) and, more importantly, the complexity of recognition and management. In this overview, we gather the evidence on the peculiar characteristics of hyper-progression and pseudo-progression in NSCLC. We aim to provide elements of current and future clinical interest and, moreover, to point out the relevance of getting more pathological and biological insights in these two entities, in order to improve their successful prediction and management.

Over the last 5 years, immunotherapy has become one of the backbones for cancer treatment, showing significant improvement in prognosis for several malignancies. Currently, in clinical practice, we have several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), while several other drugs, directed toward different co-inhibitory or co-stimulatory molecules, are under evaluation (1).

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used in cancer treatment, and a subset of patients undergo pseudoprogression. Recognizing the incidence of pseudoprogression is critical for clinical practice.PurposeTo evaluate by systematic review and meta-analysis the incidence of pseudoprogression in cancer treatment with ICIs, and compare the incidence according to response criteria, tumor types, and immunotherapeutic agents.Materials and MethodsMedline and Embase were searched to identify relevant studies published before December 31, 2018. Clinical trials, post hoc analysis of clinical trials, and prospective studies on ICI treatment in patients with malignant solid tumors were included. Pooled incidence of pseudoprogression for all included studies, per definition of pseudoprogression, cancer type, and drug type, was obtained by random-effects models with inverse variance weighting model.ResultsSeventeen studies with 3402 patients were analyzed. The pooled incidence of pseudoprogression was 6.0% (95% confidence interval: 5.0%, 7.0%). The definition of pseudoprogression were divided into four categories: progressive disease followed by partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) but not stable disease (SD) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 (six studies); progressive disease followed by SD or PR or CR with RECIST 1.1 (five studies); progressive disease followed by SD or PR or CR with RECIST 1.0 (three studies); and progressive disease followed by SD or PR or CR with immune-related response criteria (irRC) (three studies). Incidence of pseudoprogression varied from 4.5% to 8.0% per definition, ranged from 5.0% to 7.0% per cancer type, and was 5.6% with the monotherapy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitor.ConclusionThe overall incidence of pseudoprogression was 6.0% and was less than 10% in subgroup analyses according to the definitions of pseudoprogression, cancer type, and immune checkpoint inhibitor type. Varying definitions across trials and studies indicates the need for uniform criteria of pseudoprogression for solid tumors.© RSNA, 2020Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the article by Dodd and MacDermott in this issue.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) is one of the attractive but unestablished treatment for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have been treated with several-lines of systemic chemotherapy. In some NSCLC patients, effects of ICPI rechallenge therapy have become apparent. In ICPI treatment, although very rare, a phenomenon called pseudoprogression is known. We report the first case of a patient who had pseudoprogression during successful rechallenge of ICPI in a NSCLC patient. Although not fully clarified, factors related to the onset of pseudoprogression and good response to ICPI rechallenge are being investigated. Our case showed that pseudoprogression could be developed even in patients with ICPI rechallenge therapy.

… receiving checkpoint blockade, including pseudoprogression … observed after checkpoint blockade is hyperprogression, a … , suggesting that checkpoint blockade could impact …

Background The inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in therapeutic algorithms has led to significant survival benefits in patients with various metastatic cancers. Concurrently, an increasing number of neurological immune related adverse events (IRAE) has been observed. In this retrospective analysis, we examine the ICI-induced incidence of cerebral pseudoprogression and propose a classification system. Methods We screened our hospital information system to identify patients with any in-house ICI treatment for any tumor disease during the years 2007-2019. All patients with cerebral MR imaging (cMRI) of sufficient diagnostic quality were included. cMRIs were retrospectively analyzed according to immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria. Results We identified 12 cases of cerebral pseudoprogression in 123 patients treated with ICIs and sufficient MRI. These patients were receiving ICI therapy for lung cancer (n=5), malignant melanoma (n=4), glioblastoma (n=1), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1) or lymphoma (n=1) when cerebral pseudoprogression was detected. Median time from the start of ICI treatment to pseudoprogression was 5 months. All but one patient developed neurological symptoms. Three different patterns of cerebral pseudoprogression could be distinguished: new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesions, new or increasing T2 predominant lesions and cerebral vasculitis type pattern. Conclusion Cerebral pseudoprogression followed three distinct patterns and was detectable in 3.2% of all patients during ICI treatment and in 9.75% of the patients with sufficient brain imaging follow up. The fact that all but one of the affected patients developed neurological symptoms, which would be classified as progressive disease according to iRANO criteria, mandates vigilance in the diagnosis and treatment of ICI-induced cerebral lesions.

Abstract Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancers and is on the rise annually. It is characterized by low differentiation, high malignancy, and rapid growth. Consequently, treatment options are limited, and the patient’s prognosis is poor. The emergence of immunotherapy has partially improved the survival and prognosis of SCLC patients. However, a unique response known as “pseudoprogression” during immunotherapy has raised concerns. The occurrence of tumor enlargement despite a positive response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy undoubtedly affects the assessment of clinical drug efficacy and the selection of subsequent treatment strategies. In this article, we analyze a clinical case of pseudoprogression in a patient with SCLC who received immune therapy (Durvalumab). Currently, there is insufficient evidence-based medicine to guide the diagnosis, differentiation and subsequent treatment strategies for pseudoprogression in SCLC following immunotherapy. Through this case report and literature review, we aim to provide diagnostic and therapeutic insights for the clinical use of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC. Additionally, we hope that fellow readers of this article can engage in further collaborative discussions through more clinical research.

BACKGROUND The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has been a breakthrough in the care of patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). However, physicians are now facing a previously unidentified clinical situation called hyperprogression (HP), which presents as a fast and unexpected increase in tumor burden. HP's existence and specificity to ICIs remains controversial because a widely acknowledged definition is currently lacking. Meanwhile, management remains elusive. METHODS Medical records from all consecutive NSCLC patients who were treated with ICI from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The HP incidence rate was calculated according to five definitions (tumor growth rate [TGR]ratio, ΔTGR, tumor growth kinetic [TGK], RECIST, and time to treatment failure [TTF]), and the agreement between such definitions was determined. The HP impact on overall survival (OS) was then assessed. The association between HP (defined using the TGRratio definition) and clinical and biological variables was also assessed. Clinical HP management and its impact on outcomes were described. RESULTS We identified 169 consecutive ICI-treated patients, with potential HP accounting for 11.3 %, 5.7 %, 17.0 %, 9.6 %, and 31.7 % patients, according to TGRratio, ΔTGR, TGK, RECIST, and TTF definitions. Agreement between the different HP definitions was highly heterogeneous (range 29 %-77 %) and globally poor. HP was associated with shorter OS, compared to standard RECIST progressive disease, but this difference only reached statistical significance when using the TTF definition. TGRratio-based HP was significantly associated with hepatic metastases. In TGRratio-based HP patients, neither resuming chemotherapy nor corticosteroids use was associated with statistically significant impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION We found fairly heterogeneous HP rates using different definitions. TTF was the only definition leading to significantly worsened OS. Further studies are needed to provide consensus recommendations for the assessment, definition, and management of HP, whose existence is likely real.

… immune-related adverse effects. We aim to describe the incidence of pneumonitis and other rare but severe immune-related adverse effects (… between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors and …

Background and Objective Although anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies have exerted remarkable anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it remains a challenge to identify patients who can benefit from these treatments. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may be associated with improved clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint inhibition. However, no conclusive evidence of this correlation has been summarized in patients with NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between irAEs induced by anti-PD-1 antibodies and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Methods Various databases were searched from their inception to January 9, 2021, followed by screening of eligible studies. Hazard ratios were used for the pooled analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while odds ratios (ORs) were utilized to pool objective response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCRs). A random-effects model was applied to all analyses. Results A total of 26 cohorts, including 8,452 patients with NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1 antibodies, were enrolled in the study. Significantly improved OS (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.44-0.60; P < 0.01) and PFS (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.43-0.58; P < 0.01) were found to be correlated with irAEs. In addition, patients with NSCLC who developed irAEs after PD-1 inhibition demonstrated better responses to therapies, confirmed by pooled ORs of ORRs (OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 2.66-4.35; P < 0.01) and DCRs (OR: 4.08; 95% CI: 2.30-7.24; P < 0.01). Furthermore, subgroup analysis suggested that both skin and endocrine irAEs are closely correlated with a reduced risk of death, whereas pulmonary irAEs showed no association with longer OS. Conclusions In patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 therapies, the presence of irAEs was strongly correlated with better survival and response, suggesting its potential role as a predictive biomarker for outcomes after PD-1 inhibition.

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) emerged as the preferred therapy in advanced lung cancer, understanding the treatment- and immune-related adverse events of these drugs is of great significance for clinical practice. Materials and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and major conference proceedings were systematically searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in lung cancer using PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors. The outcomes included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and several organ specific immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Results: 24 RCTs involving 14,256 patients were included. There was a significant difference for ICI therapy in the incidence of any grade of TRAEs (RR: 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84–0.95; P=0.001) and a lower frequency of grade 3-5 of TRAEs (RR: 0.65; 95%CI: 0.51–0.82; P<0.001). Patients treated with ICI therapy in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were less reported TRAEs than in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A lower risk of TRAEs was favored by anti-PD-1 inhibitors over anti-PD-L1 antibodies and anti-CTLA-4 drugs. The most common organ specific IRAE was hypothyroidism that occurred 8.7%. The incidence of pneumonitis and hepatitis reached 4.5% and 4.0% respectively. Compared with patients treated in control arms, those treated with ICI drugs were at higher risk for each organ specific adverse event including colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, hypothyroidism and hypophysitis. Conclusions: ICI therapy was safer than chemotherapy, especially ICI monotherapy such as anti-PD-1 antibodies in NSCLC. Compared with standard treatments, ICI drugs increased the risk of organ-specific IRAEs, although the overall incidence remained low.

Background Programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors are increasingly used in China, but no real-world data are available about the immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This real-world retrospective study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to analyze the association between irAEs and effectiveness. Methods This was a retrospective study of the clinical data of patients with NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from August 2016 to November 2019 at Beijing Cancer Hospital. The patients were divided into the irAE or non-irAE groups. Overall adverse events, the impact of irAE on tumor response, and the association of irAEs with effectiveness were evaluated. Results One hundred and ninety-one patients were included, including 70 (36.6%) patients in the irAE group and 121 (63.4%) patients in the non-irAE group. AE, grades 3–5 AEs, and irAE occurred in 107 (56.0%), 24 (12.6%), and 70 (36.6%) of the patients, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were higher in the irAE group compared with the non-irAE group (42.0% vs. 25.8%, P=0.038; 91.9% vs. 70.8%, P=0.002). Multivariable analyses identified that irAE were associated with progression-free survival (HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.43–0.91; P=0.015), but not with overall survival (HR=0.76, 95%CI: 0.44–1.28; P=0.299). Conclusion In NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, patients with irAEs showed improved effectiveness over patients without irAEs. Future studies of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy should explore this association and the underlying biological mechanisms of efficacy.

BACKGROUND Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) developed during immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agents, could be a predictive surrogate marker of clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Patients with NSCLC, treated with anti-PD-1 agents, were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationships between types of irAEs (differentiated according to system/organ involved and to single-site/multiple-site), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We further performed a 6-week landmark analysis. RESULTS A total of 559 patients were enrolled; 231 patients (41.3%) developed irAEs of any grade and 50 patients (8.9%) G3/G4 events; 191 of them (82.6%) developed "single-site" irAEs and 40 (17.4%) "multiple-site" irAEs. At multivariate analysis, higher ORR was related to irAEs of any grade (P < .0001), "single-site" irAEs (P < .0001), endocrine (P = .0043) and skin irAEs (P = .0005). Longer PFS was related to irAEs of any grade (P < .0001), "single-site" irAEs (P < .0001), "multiple-site" irAEs (P = .0374), endocrine irAEs (P = .0084) and skin irAEs (P = .0001). Longer OS was related to irAEs of any grade (P < .0001), "single-site" irAEs (P < .0001), endocrine irAEs (P = .0044), gastrointestinal irAEs (P = .0437), skin irAEs (P = .0006), and others irAEs (P = .0378). At the 6-week landmark analysis, irAEs of any grade was confirmed an independent predictor of higher ORR, longer PFS, and longer OS. CONCLUSION Our study confirmed that irAEs are concordantly related to higher ORR, longer PFS, and longer OS with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

Immune‐related adverse events (IrAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be serious and unpredictable. We examine the incidence rate and risk factors for IrAEs in an Asian cohort of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. Between June 2014 and August 2020, we retrospectively analysed IrAEs in NSCLC patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 or anti‐PD‐L1 inhibitors at the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the effect of risk factors on incidence rate of any grade IrAEs. One hundred and forty‐one patients were enrolled. Median age was 63. Majority were male (67%) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0‐1 (77%). More than half (56%) received pembrolizumab. Eleven percent harboured epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Eighteen percent received concomitant chemotherapy. Median number of cycles was 4, and median duration of treatment was 2.1 months. IrAEs were seen in 71 (50.4%) patients, with an incidence rate of 99 events per 1000 person‐months. Fatigue (25%), rash (10.5%) and pneumonitis (7.9%) were the most common IrAEs. Twenty out of 152 IrAEs (13.2%) were Grade 3 or higher in severity: most common being pneumonitis (5.3%), fatigue (3.3%) and transaminitis (1.3%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy use, higher BMI and presence of EGFR mutation are significant predictors for IrAEs (P < .0001; P = .016; P = .007). Our findings can help guide risk stratification and monitoring of IrAEs among NSCLC patients on immunotherapy.

… (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Now that PD-(L)1 … immune-related adverse events. (A) Flow diagram of clinical course of six patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors …

Non-small-cell lung cancer takes up the majority of lung carcinoma-caused deaths. It is reported that targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a well-known immune evasion checkpoint, can eradicate tumor. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies, are actively employed in cancer treatment. Thus, this review aimed to assess the therapeutic and toxic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of NSCLC. So far, 6 monoclonal antibodies blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are identified and used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. These antibody-based therapies for NSCLC were collected by using search engine PubMed, and articles about the assessment of adverse events were collected by using Google search. Route of administration and dosage are critical parameters for efficient immunotherapy. Although antibodies can improve overall survival and are expected to be target-specific, they can cause systemic adverse effects in the host. Targeting certain biomarkers can limit the toxicity of adverse effects of the antibody-mediated therapy. Clinical experts with knowledge of adverse effects (AEs) of checkpoint inhibitors can help manage and reduce mortalities associated with antibody-based therapy of NSCLC.

Objective Anti-programmed cell death-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have been proved to have a significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many studies have demonstrated that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are significantly correlated with clinical efficacy, but the results are not consistent. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the associations between irAEs and efficacy. Methods Comprehensive searches were conducted on PubMed and EMBASE database. The HR and 95% CI were used to assess the associations between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of overall survival and progression-free survival. Subgroup analyses were performed based on irAEs type and grade of irAEs. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed by Q test, I 2 , and funnel plot. Results Compared with non-irAEs, the development of irAEs was significantly improved PFS and OS (PFS: HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.51–0.60, p  < 0.001; OS: HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68–0.81, p  < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, the occurrence of endocrine irAEs, gastrointestinal irAEs, skin lesions and low-grade irAEs was also significantly correlated with the efficacy. Additionally, the association between severe-grade irAEs and survival benefits on PFS was significant, but not on OS. Conclusions The results indicated that the occurrence of irAEs was significantly associated with a better efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC, especially endocrine, gastrointestinal, skin and low-grade irAEs.

Background: Treatment of cancers with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which could be serious and even fetal. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the characteristics of irAEs associated with the use of such drugs. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to find potential studies using the following strategies: anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment; irAEs; and cancer. R© package Meta was used to pool incidence. Results: Forty-six studies representing 12,808 oncologic patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents were included in the meta-analysis. The anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents included nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and BMS-936559. The tumor types were melanomas, Hodgkin lymphomas, urothelial carcinomas, breast cancers, non-small cell lung cancers, renal cell carcinomas (RCC), colorectal cancers, and others. We described irAEs according to organ systems, namely, the skin (pruritus, rash, maculopapular rash, vitiligo, and dermatitis), endocrine system (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, and adrenal insufficiency), digestive system (colitis, diarrhea, pancreatitis, and increased AST/ALT/bilirubin), respiratory system (pneumonitis, lung infiltration, and interstitial lung disease), and urinary system (increased creatinine, nephritis, and renal failure). In patients treated with the PD-1 signaling inhibitors, the overall incidence of irAEs was 26.82% (95% CI, 21.73–32.61; I2, 92.80) in any grade and 6.10% (95% CI, 4.85–7.64; I2, 52.00) in severe grade, respectively. The development of irAEs was unrelated to the dose of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. The incidence of particular irAEs varied when different cancers were treated with different drugs. The incidence of death due to irAEs was around 0.17%. Conclusion: The occurrence of irAEs was organ-specific and related to drug and tumor types.

The potential of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in predicting the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rarely been assessed. This study investigated the associations between irAEs and the clinical efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 73 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy from January 2022 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two cohorts: patients with irAEs and patients without irAEs. We conducted an analysis to investigate the impact of irAEs on these different clinical outcomes. There were no significant differences observed in clinical characteristics between the two cohorts, except for smoking status (P = 0.011).The cohort with irAEs exhibited a higher objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared to the cohort without irAEs (ORR: 32.5% vs 12.1%, P = 0.040; DCR: 80.0% vs 48.5%, P = 0.010).Moreover, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the cohort with irAEs compared to the cohort without irAEs (PFS: 12.4 months vs 6.8 months, P = 0.009; OS: not reached vs 18.3 months, P = 0.024). Additionally, the multivariate COX regression analysis revealed that mild irAEs (PFS: HR = 0.386, 95% CI: 0.199–0.748, P = 0.005; OS: HR = 0.300, 95% CI: 0.105–0.855, P = 0.024) and single-system irAEs (PFS: HR = 0.401, 95% CI: 0.208–0.772, P = 0.006; OS: HR = 0.264, 95% CI: 0.090–0.776, P = 0.015) were identified as independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. IrAEs, especially thyroid irAEs, as well as mild or single-system irAEs, may serve as predictors of improved efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors combination therapy.

… with peculiar inflammatory side effects, namely immune-related adverse events (irAEs). … is up to 30%–40% with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors [7]. They are often mild to moderate …

Background Selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitor. Peripheral blood biomarkers would be most convenient to predict treatment outcome and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in candidate patients. This study explored associations between inflammation-related peripheral blood markers and onset of irAEs and outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PD-1 inhibitors from January 2017 to May 2019. Cox regression models were employed to assess the prognostic effect of low/high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression models were used to analyze the correlation between peripheral blood markers and the onset of irAEs. Result NLR < 5, LDH < 240 U/L, or PNI ≥ 45 was favorably associated with significantly better outcomes compared with higher, higher, or lower values, respectively. The multivariate analysis determined that these parameters were independently associated with both better PFS ( p  = 0.049, 0.046, 0.014, respectively) and longer OS ( p  = 0.007, 0.031, < 0.001, respectively). Patients with three favorable factors among NLR, LDH, and PNI had better PFS and OS than did those with two, one, or none. PNI and NLR were associated with the onset of irAEs. Conclusion In patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1 inhibitors, pretreatment NLR, LDH, and PNI may be useful predictive markers of clinical outcome and irAEs.

… nivolumab efficacy in patients with NSCLC. As far as we are aware, our study is the first to reveal an association of irAEs with the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in NSCLC with landmark and …

… PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors are associated with a specific spectrum of immune-related adverse events… This spectrum is different from toxicities known for kinase inhibitors or cytotoxic …

Abstract Objective To evaluate rates of serious organ specific immune-related adverse events, general adverse events related to immune activation, and adverse events consistent with musculoskeletal problems for anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) drugs overall and compared with control treatments. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus searched to 16 March 2017 and combined with data from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection Eligible studies included primary clinical trial data on patients with cancer with recurrent or metastatic disease. Data extraction Three independent investigators extracted data on adverse events from ClinicalTrials.gov and the published studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool by three independent investigators. Results 13 relevant studies were included; adverse event data were available on ClinicalTrials.gov for eight. Studies compared nivolumab (n=6), pembrolizumab (5), or atezolizumab (2) with chemotherapy (11), targeted drugs (1), or both (1). Serious organ specific immune-related adverse events were rare, but compared with standard treatment, rates of hypothyroidism (odds ratio 7.56, 95% confidence interval 4.53 to 12.61), pneumonitis (5.37, 2.73 to 10.56), colitis (2.88, 1.30 to 6.37), and hypophysitis (3.38, 1.02 to 11.08) were increased with anti-PD-1 drugs. Of the general adverse events related to immune activation, only the rate of rash (2.34, 2.73 to 10.56) increased. Incidence of fatigue (32%) and diarrhea (19%) were high but similar to control. Reporting of adverse events consistent with musculoskeletal problems was inconsistent; rates varied but were over 20% in some studies for arthraligia and back pain. Conclusions Organ specific immune-related adverse events are uncommon with anti-PD-1 drugs but the risk is increased compared with control treatments. General adverse events related to immune activation are largely similar. Adverse events consistent with musculoskeletal problems are inconsistently reported but adverse events may be common.

Background: Trial-level meta-analysis to investigate differences in immune-related adverse event (irAE) profiles between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Materials & methods: Data analyzed from 8730 patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Incidence and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for irAEs overall, selected individual irAEs for individual agents and pooled estimates for anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Results: For anti-PD-L1 versus anti-PD-1 antibodies, we observed a lower risk of any-grade rash, elevated alanine aminotransferase, colitis, grade ≥3 colitis, hypothyroidism and rash. For individual agents, we observed reduced risks of overall any-grade irAEs for atezolizumab versus pembrolizumab and grade ≥3 irAEs for avelumab versus pembrolizumab. Conclusion: irAE risk may vary between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies; however, findings are hypothesis-generating.

INTRODUCTION A series of randomized controlled trials have investigated different first-line immunotherapy combinations, but the optimal combination strategy is yet to be established. METHODS We performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis by retrieving relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, the ClinicalTrials.gov, and the major international conferences. We included published and grey sources of randomized clinical trials comparing immunotherapy combinations with other treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients as first-line treatments. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020210501) to ensure transparency. RESULTS We analyzed 16 studies involving 8,278 patients, including 10 immunotherapy combinations. For patients without programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) selection, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was shown to be comparable to sintilimab plus chemotherapy in providing the best overall survival (OS) benefit (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.29). Furthermore, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy appeared to provide the best progression-free survival (PFS, HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36-0.55) as well as the best objective response rate (ORR, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.12-0.42). Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 suggested that nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 <1% and that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with the best OS in patients with PD-L1 ≥1%. Pembrolizumab and sintilimab were associated with relatively fewer grade ≥3 adverse events when compared with other immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that anti-programmed death-1 combinations are associated with potentially higher survival outcomes than anti-PD-L1 combinations with comparable safety profiles. Moreover, pem-chemo and nivo-ipi-chemo appear to be superior first-line immunotherapy combinations for advanced NSCLC patients with positive and negative PD-L1 expression, respectively. Although atezo-beva-chemo treatment provided the best PFS and ORR, the addition of chemotherapy to immunotherapy would increase the toxicity, especially when anti-angiogenesis drugs are simultaneously added.

PURPOSE Adding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has improved overall survival (OS) for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Trials of cCRT-ICB are heterogeneous for factors such as tumor stage and histology, PDL1 status and cCRT-ICB schedules. We therefore aimed to determine the ICB contribution to survival across studies and identify factors associated with survival gain. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data were collated from cCRT-ICB clinical studies published 2018-2022 which treated 2196 NSCLC patients (99% stage III). Associations between 2-year OS and ICB, CRT, patient and tumor factors were investigated using meta-regression. A published model of survival following RT or CRT was extended to include ICB effects. The model was fitted simultaneously to the cCRT-ICB data and data previously compiled for RT/CRT treatments alone. The net ICB contribution ('OS gain') and its associations with factors were described by fitted values of ICB terms added to the model. Statistical significance was determined by likelihood-ratio testing. RESULTS The gain in 2-year OS from ICB was 9.9% overall (95% CI: 7.6%, 12.2%; p=0.018). Both OS gain and 2-year OS itself rose with increasing planned ICB duration (p=0.008, 0.002 respectively) and with tumor PDL1 ≥1% (p=0.034, 0.023). Fitted OS gains were also greater for patients with stage IIIB/C disease (p=0.021). OS gain was not associated with tumor histology, patient performance status, RT dose, ICB drug type (anti-PDL1 vs anti-PD1) or whether ICB began concurrently with or after cCRT. CONCLUSION Fitted gains in 2-year OS due to ICB were higher in cohorts with greater fractions of stage IIIB/C patients and patients with tumor PDL1 ≥1%. OS gain was also significantly higher in a single cohort with a planned ICB duration of two years rather than one, but was not associated with whether ICB treatment began during vs after CRT.

Simple Summary Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In the past few decades, radiotherapy has achieved outstanding technical advances and is widely used in the management of lung cancer. The anti-tumor effect of radiotherapy is mainly caused by DNA damage in cancer cells within the irradiated field. In addition, radiotherapy induces anti-tumor immune responses that are essential in cancer control. Recently, immune checkpoint molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and their inhibitors, have attracted significant attention for overcoming the immunosuppressive conditions in patients with cancer. Furthermore, some studies showed that the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy appears promising. In this review, we outlined evidence about the combination of radiotherapy, including particle therapy using protons and carbon ions, with immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment. Abstract Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite advances in treatment. In the past few decades, radiotherapy has achieved outstanding technical advances and is being widely used as a definitive, prophylactic, or palliative treatment of patients with lung cancer. The anti-tumor effects of radiotherapy are considered to result in DNA damage in cancer cells. Moreover, recent evidence has demonstrated another advantage of radiotherapy: the induction of anti-tumor immune responses, which play an essential role in cancer control. In contrast, radiotherapy induces an immunosuppressive response. These conflicting reactions after radiotherapy suggest that maximizing immune response to radiotherapy by combining immunotherapy has potential to achieve more effective anti-tumor response than using each alone. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and their inhibitors, have attracted significant attention for overcoming the immunosuppressive conditions in patients with cancer. Therefore, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy is promising. Emerging preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the rationale for these combination strategies. In this review, we outlined evidence suggesting that combination of radiotherapy, including particle therapy using protons and carbon ions, with immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment could be a promising treatment strategy.

Summary Combination immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated promising benefit in lung cancer, but predictors of response to combination therapy are unknown. Using whole exome sequencing to examine non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1 plus CTLA-4 blockade, we found that high tumor mutation burden (TMB) predicted improved objective response, durable benefit, and progression-free survival. TMB was independent of PD-L1 expression and the strongest feature associated with efficacy in multivariable analysis. The low response rate in TMB low NSCLCs demonstrates that combination immunotherapy does not overcome the negative predictive impact of low TMB. This study demonstrates the association between TMB and benefit to combination immunotherapy in NSCLC. TMB should be incorporated in future trials examining PD-(L)1 with CTLA-4 blockade in NSCLC.

Currently, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are standard management for curatively resected stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to prior studies showing that they improve disease-free survival. However, these studies excluded the planned use of adjuvant radiation therapy. Survival benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation (CT+RT) has not been fully assessed. Using National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified and, based on therapy received, stratified 4,934 cases involving patients undergoing complete resection with pathologic stage II-IIIB NSCLC who survived at least 1 month without neoadjuvant CT or RT and subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods and multi-variable Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare adjuvant CT+RT+ICI vs. CT+RT. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The addition of ICI to adjuvant CT improved overall survival (OS) (2-year OS 90.1% vs. 86%, univariate and multivariate hazard ratios [HRs] 0.72 and 0.66, p = 0.0024 and 0.0003, respectively). However, no OS benefit was seen in those who received adjuvant CT+RT (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 76.1%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.83 and 0.85, p = 0.3677 and 0.4369, respectively). Propensity score matching analysis showed similar results (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 79.6%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.91 and 0.87, p = 0.7143 and 0.5868, respectively). Our retrospective real-world analysis suggests that adjuvant ICIs do not improve survival outcome when combined with adjuvant CT+RT. This result mirrors recent negative trials studying ICI+CT+RT in unresectable stage III NSCLC and limited-stage SCLC. Further investigations are warranted.

… landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but single-… evidence for combination immunotherapies in NSCLC and … overall survival advantage to treatment with pembrolizumab …

… survival benefit with the addition of consolidation immunotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC… This study randomized patients with unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC to definitive …

Five-year survival rates for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) range from 14% to 49% for stage I to stage IIIA disease, and are <5% for stage IIIB/IV disease. Improvements have been made in the outcomes of patients with NSCLC due to advancements in radiotherapy (RT) techniques, the use of concurrent chemotherapy with RT, and the emergence of immunotherapy as first- and second-line treatment in the metastatic setting. RT remains the mainstay treatment in patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC and is given concurrently or sequentially with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable disease. There is emerging evidence that RT not only provides local tumor control but also may influence systemic control. Multiple preclinical studies have demonstrated that RT induces immunomodulatory effects in the local tumor microenvironment, supporting a synergistic combination approach with immunotherapy to improve systemic control. Immunotherapy options that could be combined with RT include programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 blockers, as well as investigational agents such as OX-40 agonists, toll-like receptor agonists, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitors, and cytokines. Here, we describe the rationale for the integration of RT and immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC, present safety and efficacy data that support this combination strategy, review planned and ongoing studies, and highlight unanswered questions and future research needs.

Immuno-oncology has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) since the approval of immunotherapy by the U.S. FDA in 2015. Despite the advancements, outcomes for patients have room for further improvement. Combination therapies have shown promise in overcoming resistance and improving outcomes. This review focuses on current immunotherapy-based combination approaches, reported and ongoing trials, as well as novel combination strategies, challenges, and future directions for mNSCLC treatment. We summarize approaches in combination with chemotherapy, novel immune checkpoints, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other strategies including vaccines, and radiation therapy. The promise of biomarker-driven studies to understand resistance and design multi-arm platform trials that evaluate novel therapies is becoming of increasing relevance with the ultimate goal of administering precision immunotherapy by identifying the right dose of the right combination for the right patient at the right time.

Treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly improved in recent years with the incorporation of drugs targeting antiangiogenesis and more specifically genomic alterations such as the EGFR mutations and ALK translocations. However, most patients invariably progress and die. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the pathways involved in tumor-induced immunosuppression have redefined the management of the disease, achieving significant long-lasting responses with manageable safety profiles, regardless of histology. Still, response rates with immunotherapy are deemed suboptimal. Current efforts are focusing on new potential combination strategies with synergistic antitumor activity, using immune checkpoint blockade as a partner for targeted agents. Herein we discuss the available data on the combined use of immunotherapy, including PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, with EGFR and ALK inhibitors and comment on the current status of immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic drugs for molecularly unselected advanced NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an unsolved challenge in oncology, signifying a substantial global health burden. While considerable progress has been made in recent years through the emergence of immunotherapy modalities, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monotherapies often yield limited clinical outcomes. The rationale behind combining various immunotherapeutic or other anticancer agents, the mechanistic underpinnings, and the clinical evidence supporting their utilization is crucial in NSCLC therapy. Regarding the synergistic potential of combination immunotherapies, this study aims to provide insights to help the landscape of NSCLC treatment and improve clinical outcomes. In addition, this review article discusses the challenges and considerations of combination regimens, including toxicity management and patient selection.

Radiotherapy plays a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with all stages of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the standard of care in these patients. The use of ICIs is increasingly utilized in the definitive setting as an adjunct to chemoradiotherapy or surgery and remains a vital component in the treatment of metastatic disease. Despite improvements in patient survival, the use of immunotherapy as monotherapy has shown limited overall response rates with susceptibility to resistance. Radiotherapy has been identified as a viable option to enhance the response rate to ICI and improve outcomes in NSCLC.

Osimertinib is the standard first‐line treatment for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Resistance to osimertinib remains a clinical challenge. However, the optimal therapy for these patients is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IO+C) compared with chemotherapy (C) in NSCLC patients after progression on osimertinib.

… combinations for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The authors are to be commended for attempting to answer a long-standing question on the benefit-… -immunotherapy is …

Immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) have revolutionized cancer treatment, especially in patients whose disease was otherwise considered incurable. However, primary and secondary resistance to single agent immunotherapy often results in treatment failure, and only a minority of patients experience long-term benefits. This review article will discuss the relationship between cancer immune response and mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy. It will also provide a comprehensive review on the latest clinical status of combination therapies (e.g., immunotherapy with chemotherapy, radiation therapy and targeted therapy), and discuss combination therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It will provide an overview of therapies targeting cytokines and other soluble immunoregulatory factors, ACT, virotherapy, innate immune modifiers and cancer vaccines, as well as combination therapies that exploit alternative immune targets and other therapeutic modalities. Finally, this review will include the stimulating insights from the 2020 China Immuno-Oncology Workshop co-organized by the Chinese American Hematologist and Oncologist Network (CAHON), the China National Medical Product Administration (NMPA) and Tsinghua University School of Medicine.

Background The difference of patients' baseline characteristics such as sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and smoking status may influence the immune response. However, little is known about whether these factors affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between patients' baseline characteristics and survival benefits in immunotherapy-treated NSCLC. Materials and Methods We performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NSCLC immunotherapy. We also searched abstracts and presentations from the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology to identify unpublished studies. These studies have available data based on patients' baseline characteristics (such as sex, age, ECOG PS, and smoking status). We take the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) as the effect index and use the random effect model to pool the results. Results We included 18 phase II/III RCTs with a total of 14,189 participants. The benefits of ICIs were found for both male (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82, P < 0.05) and female patients (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.87, P < 0.05); for both younger (<65 y: pooled OS-HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.81, P < 0.05) and older patients (≥65 y: pooled OS-HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.86, P < 0.05); and for both patients with ECOG PS = 0 (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, P < 0.05) and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (pooled OS-HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.82, P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of ICIs among different sex (P value for interaction = 0.955), age (P value for interaction = 0.17), or ECOG PS (P value for interaction = 0.765). However, in patients with different smoking status, the application of ICIs significantly prolonged the OS of smokers (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83, P < 0.05) but could not significantly improve the OS of never smokers (pooled OS-HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03, P > 0.05). Conclusions ICIs could significantly improve prognosis in patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of sex, age, or ECOG PS. But among patients with different smoking status, the survival benefits of never smokers treated with ICIs were no better than that of controls. The impact of these factors on immunotherapy should be considered in the future clinical practice and guidelines.

… NSCLC, … immunotherapies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and nintedanib). It is hypothesized that combining immunotherapy …

Simple Summary The expected change in overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after the clinical implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) has not been substantially investigated in large real-world cohorts outside randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this nationwide study, we compared OS before and after the implementation of ICI and found that 3-year OS tripled from 6% to 18%. Patients receiving ICI had a lower OS than demonstrated in RCTs, except for patients with performance status (PS) 0. More than a fifth of the patients progressed early within the first six ICI cycles. Adverse prognostic factors were PS ≥ 1 and metastases to the bone and liver. Abstract Background The selection of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment remains challenging. This real-world study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) before and after the implementation of ICIs, to identify OS prognostic factors, and to assess treatment data in first-line (1L) ICI-treated patients without epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation. Methods Data from the Danish NSCLC population initiated with 1L palliative antineoplastic treatment from 1 January 2013 to 1 October 2018, were extracted from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry (DLCR). Long-term survival and median OS pre- and post-approval of 1L ICI were compared. From electronic health records, additional clinical and treatment data were obtained for ICI-treated patients from 1 March 2017 to 1 October 2018. Results The OS was significantly improved in the DLCR post-approval cohort (n = 2055) compared to the pre-approval cohort (n = 1658). The 3-year OS rates were 18% (95% CI 15.6–20.0) and 6% (95% CI 5.1–7.4), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, bone (HR = 1.63) and liver metastases (HR = 1.47), performance status (PS) 1 (HR = 1.86), and PS ≥ 2 (HR = 2.19) were significantly associated with poor OS in ICI-treated patients. Conclusion OS significantly improved in patients with advanced NSCLC after ICI implementation in Denmark. In ICI-treated patients, PS ≥ 1, and bone and liver metastases were associated with a worse prognosis.

Importance For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with frontline immunotherapy-based treatment, the optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment is unknown. Objective To assess practice patterns surrounding ICI treatment discontinuation at 2 years and to evaluate the association of duration of therapy with overall survival in patients who received fixed-duration ICI therapy for 2 years vs those who continued therapy beyond 2 years. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, population-based cohort study included adult patients in a clinical database diagnosed with advanced NSCLC from 2016 to 2020, who received frontline immunotherapy-based treatment. The data cutoff was August 31, 2022; data analysis was conducted from October 2022 to January 2023. Exposures Treatment discontinuation at 2 years (between 700 and 760 days, fixed duration) vs continued treatment beyond 2 years (greater than 760 days, indefinite duration). Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival from 760 days was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression that adjusted for patient-specific and cancer-specific factors was used to compare survival beyond 760 days between the fixed-duration group and the indefinite-duration group. Results Of 1091 patients in the analytic cohort who were still on ICI treatment at 2 years after exclusion criteria for death and progression were applied, 113 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-75] years; 62 [54.9%] female; 86 [76.1%] White) were in the fixed-duration group, and 593 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-76] years; 282 [47.6%] female; 414 [69.8%] White) were in the indefinite-duration group. Patients in the fixed-duration group were more likely to have a history of smoking (99% vs 93%; P = .01) and be treated at an academic center (22% vs 11%; P = .001). Two-year overall survival from 760 days was 79% (95% CI, 66%-87%) in the fixed-duration group and 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%) in the indefinite-duration group. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients in the fixed-duration and indefinite-duration groups, either on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26; 95% CI, 0.77-2.08; P = .36) or multivariable (HR 1.33; 95% CI, 0.78-2.25; P = .29) Cox regression. Approximately 1 in 5 patients discontinued immunotherapy at 2 years in the absence of progression. Conclusions and Relevance In a retrospective clinical cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with immunotherapy and were progression-free at 2 years, approximately only 1 in 5 discontinued treatment. The lack of statistically significant overall survival advantage for the indefinite-duration cohort on adjusted analysis provides reassurance to patients and clinicians who wish to discontinue immunotherapy at 2 years.