雄鼠减数分裂的高分文章
减数分裂的启动、细胞命运决定与发育调控
聚焦于精原细胞转化为减数分裂细胞的启动机制、细胞命运决定关键蛋白(如NANOS2、STRA8、MEIOSIN)的作用,以及性别差异对减数分裂起始的抑制与促进机制。
- Mechanism of initiation of meiosis in mouse germ cells.(K. Ishiguro, 2023, Current Topics in Developmental Biology)
- NANOS2 promotes male germ cell development independent of meiosis suppression.(R. Saba, Yuzuru Kato, Y. Saga, 2014, Developmental Biology)
- A century of research on mammalian male germ cell meiotic differentiation in vitro.(C. Staub, 2001, Journal of Andrology)
- Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation(Norman B. Hecht, 1998, BioEssays)
- Mechanisms of meiosis initiation and meiotic prophase progression during spermatogenesis.(Kei-ichiro Ishiguro, 2024, Molecular Aspects of Medicine)
- Nanos2 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell differentiation.(A. Suzuki, Y. Saga, 2008, Genes & Development)
- Entry of mouse embryonic germ cells into meiosis.(A. McLaren, D. Southee, 1997, Developmental Biology)
- A role for cyclin A1 in the activation of MPF and G2-M transition during meiosis of male germ cells in mice.(Dong Liu, Ching Liao, D. Wolgemuth, 2000, Developmental Biology)
- Regulation of meiotic recombination and prophase I progression in mammals(P. Cohen, J. Pollard, 2001, BioEssays)
- Analysis of meiotic prophase I in live mouse spermatocytes(Meisha A. Morelli, U. Werling, W. Edelmann, M. Roberson, P. Cohen, 2008, Chromosome Research)
- Meioc maintains an extended meiotic prophase I in mice(Y. Q. S. Soh, M. Mikedis, Mina L. Kojima, Alexander K. Godfrey, D. G. Rooij, D. Page, D. Page, 2017, PLOS Genetics)
- Meiosis-specific ZFP541 repressor complex promotes developmental progression of meiotic prophase towards completion during mouse spermatogenesis(Yuki Horisawa-Takada, Chisato Kodera, K. Takemoto, A. Sakashita, Kenichi Horisawa, Ryo Maeda, Ryuki Shimada, Shingo Usuki, Sayoko Fujimura, Naoki Tani, K. Matsuura, Tomohiko Akiyama, A. Suzuki, H. Niwa, M. Tachibana, T. Ohba, H. Katabuchi, S. Namekawa, K. Araki, K. Ishiguro, 2021, Nature Communications)
- Mechanism and regulation of rapid telomere prophase movements in mouse meiotic chromosomes(Chih-Ying Lee, Henning F. Horn, C. Stewart, B. Burke, Ewelina Bolcun-Filas, J. Schimenti, M. E. Dresser, R. Pezza, 2015, Cell Reports)
- Regulation of the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles in the male germ line.(D. Wolgemuth, Erika Laurion, Karen M. Lele, 2002, Recent Progress in Hormone Research)
- Gene knockout of Zmym3 in mice arrests spermatogenesis at meiotic metaphase with defects in spindle assembly checkpoint(X Hu, B Shen, S Liao, Y Ning, L Ma, J Chen, X Lin, 2017, Cell Death & …)
- FGF9 suppresses meiosis and promotes male germ cell fate in mice.(J. Bowles, C. Feng, Cassy M. Spiller, Tara-Lynne Davidson, Andrew Jackson, P. Koopman, 2010, Developmental Cell)
PRDM9与重组热点识别的分子机制
专门探讨PRDM9作为关键表观遗传调控因子,如何通过组蛋白甲基化特异性识别并定义减数分裂重组热点,以及其与SPO11等因子的协同互作机制。
- Histone methyltransferase PRDM9 is not essential for meiosis in male mice(O. Mihola, F. Pratto, Kevin Brick, E. Linhartova, T. Kobets, P. Flachs, Christopher L. Baker, R. Sedláček, K. Paigen, P. Petkov, R. Camerini‐Otero, Z. Trachtulec, 2019, Genome Research)
- PRDM9, a driver of the genetic map(C. Grey, F. Baudat, B. de Massy, 2018, PLOS Genetics)
- Prdm9 and meiotic cohesin proteins cooperatively promote DNA double-strand break formation in mammalian spermatocytes(Tanmoy Bhattacharyya, Michael Walker, Natalie R. Powers, Catherine Brunton, Alexander D. Fine, P. Petkov, M. Handel, 2019, Current Biology)
- Meiotic Epigenetic Factor PRDM9 Impacts Sperm Quality of Hybrid Mice.(Fitore Kusari, O. Mihola, J. Schimenti, Z. Trachtulec, 2020, Reproduction)
- The PRDM9 KRAB domain is required for meiosis and involved in protein interactions(Yukiko Imai, F. Baudat, Miguel Taillepierre, Marcello Stanzione, A. Tóth, B. de Massy, 2017, Chromosoma)
- PRDM9 interactions with other proteins provide a link between recombination hotspots and the chromosomal axis in meiosis(Emil Parvanov, H. Tian, Timothy Billings, R. Saxl, Catrina Spruce, Rakesh Aithal, L. Krejci, K. Paigen, P. Petkov, 2017, Molecular Biology of the Cell)
- Rat PRDM9 shapes recombination landscapes, duration of meiosis, gametogenesis, and age of fertility(O. Mihola, V. Landa, F. Pratto, Kevin Brick, T. Kobets, Fitore Kusari, Srdjan Gasic, F. Smagulova, C. Grey, P. Flachs, Václav Gergelits, Karel Tresnak, J. Šilhavý, P. Mlejnek, R. Camerini‐Otero, M. Pravenec, G. Petukhova, Z. Trachtulec, 2021, BMC Biology)
- Nuclear Localization of PRDM9 and Its Role in Meiotic Chromatin Modifications and Homologous Synapsis(F. Sun, Y. Fujiwara, Laura G. Reinholdt, Jianjun Hu, R. Saxl, Christopher L. Baker, P. Petkov, K. Paigen, M. Handel, 2015, Chromosoma)
- ATM and PRDM9 regulate SPO11-bound recombination intermediates during meiosis(Jacob Paiano, Wei Wu, Shintaro Yamada, Nicholas Sciascia, E. Callen, Ana Paola Cotrim, R. Deshpande, Yaakov Maman, Amanda M. Day, T. Paull, A. Nussenzweig, 2019, Nature Communications)
- PRDM9 Methyltransferase Activity Is Essential for Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation at Its Binding Sites.(Boubou Diagouraga, J. Clément, L. Duret, J. Kadlec, B. de Massy, F. Baudat, 2018, Molecular Cell)
- Interrogating the Functions of PRDM9 Domains in Meiosis(S. Thibault-Sennett, Qi Yu, F. Smagulova, J. Cloutier, Kevin Brick, R. Camerini‐Otero, G. Petukhova, 2018, Genetics)
- PRDM9 is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in humans and mice(F. Baudat, J. Buard, C. Grey, A. Fledel-Alon, C. Ober, Molly Przeworski, Molly Przeworski, G. Coop, B. Massy, 2009, Science)
减数分裂重组、DNA修复与交叉互换调控
集中研究减数分裂前期DNA双链断裂的产生、修复通路(如MMR、RAD51/DMC1),以及交叉互换频率、干扰机制与稳态控制的分子基础。
- Mechanistic Insight into Crossing over during Mouse Meiosis(Shaun Peterson, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin, 2020, Molecular Cell)
- ATM Promotes the Obligate XY Crossover and both Crossover Control and Chromosome Axis Integrity on Autosomes(M. Barchi, I. Roig, M. Di Giacomo, D. D. de Rooij, S. Keeney, M. Jasin, 2008, PLoS Genetics)
- Control of Meiotic Crossovers: From Double-Strand Break Formation to Designation(Stephen Gray, P. Cohen, 2016, Annual Review of Genetics)
- Essential roles of the ANKRD31–REC114 interaction in meiotic recombination and mouse spermatogenesis(Jiaqi Xu, Tao Li, Soonjoung Kim, M. Boekhout, S. Keeney, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Hotspots of homologous recombination in mouse meiosis.(T. Shiroishi, Tsuyoshi Koide, M. Yoshino, T. Sagai, Kazuo Moriwaki, 1995, Advances in Biophysics)
- Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis.(Hélène Guillon, F. Baudat, C. Grey, R. Liskay, B. de Massy, 2005, Molecular Cell)
- Sexual dimorphism in the meiotic requirement for PRDM9: A mammalian evolutionary safeguard(Natalie R. Powers, Beth L. Dumont, Chihiro Emori, R. Lawal, Catherine Brunton, K. Paigen, M. Handel, Ewelina Bolcun-Filas, P. Petkov, Tanmoy Bhattacharyya, 2020, Science Advances)
- The Recombinational Anatomy of a Mouse Chromosome(K. Paigen, J. Szatkiewicz, Kathryn Sawyer, N. Leahy, Emil Parvanov, Siemon H. S. Ng, J. Graber, K. Broman, P. Petkov, 2008, PLoS Genetics)
- Cisplatin increases meiotic crossing-over in mice.(W. Hanneman, M. Légaré, S. Sweeney, J. Schimenti, 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination.(Esther de Boer, P. Stam, A. Dietrich, A. Pastink, C. Heyting, 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis(F. Baudat, B. Massy, 2007, Chromosome Research)
- Initiation and resolution of interhomolog connections: crossover and non-crossover sites along mouse synaptonemal complexes(P. Moens, E. Marcon, J. Shore, N. Kochakpour, B. Spyropoulos, 2007, Journal of Cell Science)
- RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis(April Reynolds, Huanyu Qiao, Huanyu Qiao, Ye Yang, Jefferson K. Chen, N. Jackson, K. Biswas, J. K. Holloway, F. Baudat, B. Massy, Jeremy Wang, C. Höög, P. Cohen, N. Hunter, 2013, Nature Genetics)
- Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis(F. Cole, L. Kauppi, Julian Lange, I. Roig, Raymond Wang, S. Keeney, M. Jasin, 2012, Nature Cell Biology)
- Fancm has dual roles in the limiting of meiotic crossovers and germ cell maintenance in mammals(Vanessa Tsui, R. Lyu, S. Novakovic, J. Stringer, Jessica E. M. Dunleavy, Elissah Granger, Tim Semple, Anna L. Leichter, L. Martelotto, D. J. Merriner, Rui Liu, Lucy McNeill, Nadeen Zerafa, E. Hoffmann, Moira K. O’Bryan, K. Hutt, A. Deans, J. Heierhorst, Davis J. McCarthy, W. Crismani, 2023, Cell Genomics)
- CXXC finger protein 1-mediated histone H3 lysine-4 trimethylation is essential for proper meiotic crossover formation in mice(Yu Jiang, Huiying Zhang, Zhen Lin, Yezhang Zhu, Chao Yu, Qian‐Qian Sha, M. Tong, Li Shen, H. Fan, 2020, Development)
- Meiotic Knockdown and Complementation Reveals Essential Role of RAD51 in Mouse Spermatogenesis(J. Dai, O. Voloshin, Svetlana Potapova, R. Camerini‐Otero, 2017, Cell Reports)
- Mouse HFM1/Mer3 Is Required for Crossover Formation and Complete Synapsis of Homologous Chromosomes during Meiosis(M. F. Guiraldelli, Craig A. Eyster, Joseph L. Wilkerson, M. E. Dresser, R. Pezza, 2013, PLoS Genetics)
- Epigenetic Factors and Regulation of Meiotic Recombination in Mammals(Pauline Barthès, J. Buard, B. Massy, 2011, Epigenetics and Human Health)
- SHOC1, an XPF endonuclease-related protein, is essential for the formation of class I meiotic crossovers.(N. Macaisne, M. Novatchkova, Lucie Peirera, D. Vezon, S. Jolivet, N. Froger, L. Chelysheva, M. Grelon, R. Mercier, 2008, Current Biology)
- Genetic dissection of crossover mutants defines discrete intermediates in mouse meiosis(Tolkappiyan Premkumar, Lakshmi Paniker, Rhea Kang, Mathilde Biot, Ericka Humphrey, Honorine Destain, Isabella Ferranti, Iyinyeoluwa Okulate, Holly M. Nguyen, Vindhya Kilaru, Melissa Frasca, Parijat Chakraborty, Francesca Cole, 2023, Molecular Cell)
- A Highly Polymorphic Meiotic Recombination Mouse Hot Spot Exhibits Incomplete Repair(P. Bois, 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology)
- Meiotic errors activate checkpoints that improve gamete quality without triggering apoptosis in male germ cells.(Aimee Jaramillo-Lambert, Yuriko Harigaya, J. Vitt, A. Villeneuve, J. Engebrecht, 2010, Current Biology)
- PCNA activates the MutLγ endonuclease to promote meiotic crossing over(D. Kulkarni, Shannon N. Owens, Masayoshi Honda, Masaru Ito, Ye Yang, Mary W. Corrigan, Lan Chen, Aric L. Quan, N. Hunter, 2020, Nature)
- Mutation of the ATPase Domain of MutS Homolog-5 (MSH5) Reveals a Requirement for a Functional MutSγ Complex for All Crossovers in Mammalian Meiosis(Carolyn R. Milano, J. K. Holloway, Yongwei Zhang, Bo Jin, Cameron Smith, A. Bergman, W. Edelmann, P. Cohen, 2019, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics)
- Mechanism and regulation of meiotic double-strand break formation in mammals.(Xinzhe Tang, Ming-Han Tong, 2026, Trends in Biochemical Sciences)
- Infertility and aneuploidy in mice lacking a type IA DNA topoisomerase IIIβ(Kelvin Y. Kwan, P. Moens, James C. Wang, 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- A novel recombination protein C12ORF40/REDIC1 is required for meiotic crossover formation(Suixing Fan, Yue-wen Wang, Hanwei Jiang, Xiaohua Jiang, Jianteng Zhou, Yuying Jiao, Jingwei Ye, Zishuo Xu, Yue Wang, Xuefeng Xie, Huan Zhang, Yang Li, Wei Liu, Xiang Zhang, Hui Ma, Baolu Shi, Yuanwei Zhang, Muhammad Zubair, W. Shah, Zhipeng Xu, Bo Xu, Qinghua Shi, 2023, Cell Discovery)
- FancJ (Brip1) loss-of-function allele results in spermatogonial cell depletion during embryogenesis and altered processing of crossover sites during meiotic prophase I in mice(Xianfei Sun, M. Brieño-Enríquez, Alyssa J. Cornelius, A. Modzelewski, Tyler T. Maley, Kadeine M. Campbell-Peterson, J. K. Holloway, Paula E. Cohen, 2015, Chromosoma)
- Novel and diverse functions of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination(N. Kolas, P. Cohen, 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research)
- Gamma-irradiation increased meiotic crossovers in mouse spermatocytes.(Xin Cai, Jianhua Li, Qing-ling Yang, Qinghua Shi, 2011, Mutagenesis)
- An initiation site for meiotic crossing-over and gene conversion in the mouse(H Guillon, B de Massy, 2002, Nature genetics)
染色体动力学、结构组装与细胞周期控制
探讨减数分裂过程中染色体联会复合体、轴构件、动粒排列以及染色体空间组织结构,并结合检查点网络(如纺锤体检查点)对减数分裂进程的监控。
- Morphological and temporal sequence of meiotic prophase development at puberty in the male mouse(P Goetz, Ann C. Chandley, R.M. Speed, 1984, Journal of Cell Science)
- Arrangements of kinetochores in mouse cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis(B. Brinkley, S. Brenner, J. Hall, A. Tousson, R. Balczon, M. Valdivia, 2004, Chromosoma)
- The meiotic checkpoint network: step-by-step through meiotic prophase.(Vijayalakshmi V. Subramanian, Andreas Hochwagen, 2014, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology)
- A new role for the mitotic RAD21/SCC1 cohesin in meiotic chromosome cohesion and segregation in the mouse(Huiling Xu, Matthew D. Beasley, Sandra Verschoor, A. Inselman, M. Handel, M. McKay, 2004, The EMBO Reports)
- CDK2 is required for proper homologous pairing, recombination and sex-body formation during male mouse meiosis(A. Viera, J. S. Rufas, I. Martínez, J. Barbero, Sagrario Ortega, J. Suja, 2009, Journal of Cell Science)
- ATR is a multifunctional regulator of male mouse meiosis(Alexander Widger, S. Mahadevaiah, Julian Lange, E. Elinati, Jasmin Zohren, Takayuki Hirota, Sarai Pacheco, Andros Maldonado-Linares, Marcello Stanzione, O. Ojarikre, Valdone Maciulyte, D. D. de Rooij, A. Tóth, I. Roig, S. Keeney, J. Turner, 2018, Nature Communications)
- Genetic analysis of chromosome pairing, recombination, and cell cycle control during first meiotic prophase in mammals.(P. Cohen, S. Pollack, J. Pollard, 2006, Endocrine Reviews)
- Nuclear Architecture of Mouse Spermatocytes: Chromosome Topology, Heterochromatin, and Nucleolus(S. Berríos, 2017, Cytogenetic and Genome Research)
- The DNA helicase FANCJ (BRIP1) functions in double strand break repair processing, but not crossover formation during prophase I of meiosis in male mice(Tegan S. Horan, Carolline F. R. Ascencao, Christopher Mellor, Meng Wang, Marcus B. Smolka, Paula E. Cohen, 2024, PLOS Genetics)
- Meiotic prophase abnormalities and metaphase cell death in MLH1-deficient mouse spermatocytes: insights into regulation of spermatogenic progress.(S. Eaker, J. Cobb, April D. Pyle, M. Handel, 2002, Developmental Biology)
- Age-dependent alterations in meiotic recombination cause chromosome segregation errors in spermatocytes(M. Żelazowski, Maria Sandoval, L. Paniker, Holly M. Hamilton, Jiaying Han, Mikalah A. Gribbell, Rhea Kang, F. Cole, 2017, Cell)
- Crossover frequencies in spermatocytes of Robertsonian homozygotes and heterozygotes of Mus musculus domesticus(E. Ayarza, Marisel González, J. Page, S. Berríos, 2025, Genetics and Molecular Biology)
- Aurora B and C kinases regulate chromosome desynapsis and segregation during mouse and human spermatogenesis(Stephen R. Wellard, K. Schindler, Philip W. Jordan, 2020, Journal of Cell Science)
- DAZ Family Proteins Exist Throughout Male Germ Cell Development and Transit from Nucleus to Cytoplasm at Meiosis in Humans and Mice1(R. Reijo, D. Dorfman, R. Slee, A. Renshaw, K. Loughlin, H. Cooke, D. Page, 2000, Biology of Reproduction)
- The spindle checkpoint and chromosome segregation in meiosis(G. Gorbsky, 2015, The FEBS Journal)
精子发生过程中的表观遗传调控与染色质重塑
重点研究减数分裂期间的组蛋白修饰(如H3K4, H3K9, H4)、DNA甲基化、性染色体失活与重激活、以及转座子活化对基因组稳定性的影响。
- Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L(D. Bourc’his, T. Bestor, 2004, Nature)
- Expression of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation and its demethylases in the developing mouse testis(Liuping Zhang, Jie‐Li Wang, Yaoqian Pan, Jie Jin, Jianrong Sang, Pan Huang, Genbao Shao, 2014, Cell and Tissue Research)
- DICER regulates the expression of major satellite repeat transcripts and meiotic chromosome segregation during spermatogenesis(R. Yadav, Juho-Antti Mäkelä, Hanna Hyssälä, Sheyla Cisneros-Montalvo, N. Kotaja, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
- Sperm histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation is altered in a genetic mouse model of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance(A. Lismer, Keith Siklenka, C. Lafleur, V. Dumeaux, S. Kimmins, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
- The role of chromatin modifications in progression through mouse meiotic prophase.(J. H. Crichton, Christopher J. Playfoot, I. Adams, 2014, Journal of Genetics and Genomics)
- Expression and epigenomic landscape of the sex chromosomes in mouse post-meiotic male germ cells(Charlotte Moretti, Daniel Vaiman, F. Tores, J. Cocquet, 2016, Epigenetics & Chromatin)
- Distinct H3K9me3 and DNA methylation modifications during mouse spermatogenesis(Yingdong Liu, Yanping Zhang, Jiqing Yin, Yawei Gao, Yanhe Li, Dandan Bai, Wenteng He, Xueliang Li, Pengfei Zhang, Rongnan Li, Lingkai Zhang, Yanping Jia, Yalin Zhang, Jiaming Lin, Yi Zheng, Hong Wang, Shaorong Gao, W. Zeng, Wenqiang Liu, 2019, Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- Comprehensive histochemical profiles of histone modification in male germline cells during meiosis and spermiogenesis: Comparison of young and aged testes in mice(Misako Tatehana, Ryuichi Kimura, Kentaro Mochizuki, H. Inada, N. Osumi, 2020, PLOS ONE)
- Developmental acquisition of genome-wide DNA methylation occurs prior to meiosis in male germ cells.(C. Oakes, S. La Salle, D. Smiraglia, B. Robaire, J. Trasler, 2007, Developmental Biology)
- SETD1B-mediated broad H3K4me3 controls proper temporal patterns of gene expression critical for spermatid development(Zhen Lin, Bowen Rong, Ruitu Lyu, Yuxuan Zheng, Yao Chen, Junyi Yan, Meixia Wu, Xiaogang Gao, Fuchou Tang, Fei Lan, Ming-Han Tong, 2025, Cell Research)
- The Testis-Enriched Histone Demethylase, KDM4D, Regulates Methylation of Histone H3 Lysine 9 During Spermatogenesis in the Mouse but Is Dispensable for Fertility1(N. Iwamori, Ming Zhao, M. Meistrich, M. Matzuk, 2011, Biology of Reproduction)
- H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis.(O. Fernández-Capetillo, S. Mahadevaiah, Arkady Celeste, P. Romanienko, R. Camerini‐Otero, W. Bonner, K. Manova, P. Burgoyne, A. Nussenzweig, 2003, Developmental Cell)
- Epigenetic transitions in germ cell development and meiosis.(Satya K. Kota, R. Feil, 2010, Developmental Cell)
- Male germ cell gene expression.(E. M. Eddy, 2002, Recent Progress in Hormone Research)
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of Histone H3 Modifications in Germ Cells during Mouse Spermatogenesis(Ning Song, Jie Liu, Shucai An, T. Nishino, Y. Hishikawa, Takehiko Koji, 2011, ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA)
- Staged developmental mapping and X chromosome transcriptional dynamics during mouse spermatogenesis(Christina Ernst, Nils Eling, C. Martinez-Jimenez, J. Marioni, D. Odom, 2018, Nature Communications)
- Functional dynamics of H3K9 methylation during meiotic prophase progression(M. Tachibana, M. Nozaki, N. Takeda, Y. Shinkai, 2007, The EMBO Journal)
- The histone modification reader ZCWPW1 is required for meiosis prophase I in male but not in female mice(Miao Li, Tao Huang, Mengjing Li, Chuanxin Zhang, Xiaochen Yu, Yingying Yin, Chao Liu, Xin Wang, Haiwei Feng, Tuo Zhang, Mo-Fang Liu, Chun‐Sheng Han, Gang Lu, Wei Li, Jin-long Ma, Zi-Jiang Chen, Hong-Bin Liu, Kui Liu, 2019, Science Advances)
- Histone H4 Modification During Mouse Spermatogenesis(Y. Shirakata, Y. Hiradate, H. Inoue, E. Sato, K. Tanemura, 2014, Journal of Reproduction and Development)
- The genomic distribution of histone H3K4me2 in spermatogonia is highly conserved in sperm†(R. Lambrot, Keith Siklenka, C. Lafleur, S. Kimmins, 2019, Biology of Reproduction)
- Integrated transcriptome analysis of mouse spermatogenesis(G. Margolin, P. Khil, Joongbaek Kim, M. Bellani, R. Camerini‐Otero, 2014, BMC Genomics)
- Nucleosome occupancy landscape and dynamics at mouse recombination hotspots(I. Getun, Zhen K. Wu, A. Khalil, P. Bois, 2010, The EMBO Reports)
遗传异质性、物种演化与不育机制研究
综合分析遗传背景差异、种间杂交不育、性染色体演化对雄性生殖力及重组率的影响,以及环境因素(如BPA)与遗传变异导致的病理表现。
- Estrogenic Exposure Alters the Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Developing Testis, Permanently Reducing Crossover Levels in the Adult(Lisa A. Vrooman, J. Oatley, J. Griswold, T. Hassold, P. Hunt, 2015, PLOS Genetics)
- Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting.(L. Froenicke, L. Anderson, J. Wienberg, T. Ashley, 2002, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
- Genetic Analysis of Genome-Scale Recombination Rate Evolution in House Mice(Beth L. Dumont, B. Payseur, 2011, PLoS Genetics)
- Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains.(K. E. Koehler, J. Cherry, A. Lynn, P. Hunt, T. Hassold, 2002, Genetics)
- Hybrid Sterility Locus on Chromosome X Controls Meiotic Recombination Rate in Mouse(Maria Balcova, Barbora Faltusova, Václav Gergelits, Tanmoy Bhattacharyya, O. Mihola, Z. Trachtulec, Corinna Knopf, Vladana Fotopulosova, I. Chvatalova, S. Gregorová, J. Forejt, 2016, PLOS Genetics)
- Spermatogenesis and the evolution of mammalian sex chromosomes(E. Larson, Emily E. K. Kopania, J. Good, 2018, Trends in Genetics)
- High rate of recombination and double crossovers in the mouse pseudoautosomal region during male meiosis.(Philippe Soriano, E. Keitges, D. Schorderet, K. Harbers, S. Gartler, R. Jaenisch, 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Sex chromosome recombination failure, apoptosis, and fertility in male mice(Imrul Faisal, L. Kauppi, 2015, Chromosoma)
- Increased variability in nuclear DNA content of testis cells and spermatozoa from mice with irregular meiotic segregation.(M. Meistrich, S. Lake, L. Steinmetz, B. Gledhill, 1978, Mutation Research)
- The mouse meiotic mutation mei1 disrupts chromosome synapsis with sexually dimorphic consequences for meiotic progression.(B. Libby, R. De La Fuente, M. O'Brien, K. Wigglesworth, J. Cobb, A. Inselman, S. Eaker, M. Handel, J. Eppig, J. Schimenti, 2002, Developmental Biology)
- Reproductive Isolation in Hybrid Mice Due to Spermatogenesis Defects at Three Meiotic Stages(A. Oka, Akihiko Mita, Yuki Takada, H. Koseki, T. Shiroishi, 2010, Genetics)
- The tricky path to recombining X and Y chromosomes in meiosis(L. Kauppi, M. Jasin, S. Keeney, 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences)
- Biochemistry of male germ cell differentiation in mammals: RNA synthesis in meiotic and postmeiotic cells.(V. Monesi, R. Geremia, A. D'agostino, C. Boitani, 1978, Current Topics in Developmental Biology)
- Transmeiotic differentiation of male germ cells in culture.(M. Rassoulzadegan, V. Paquis-Flucklinger, B. Bertino, J. Sage, M. Jasin, K. Miyagawa, V. Heyningen, P. Besmer, F. Cuzin, 1993, Cell)
- Meiosis in the male mouse. An autoradiographic investigation(S. Kofman‐Alfaro, A. Chandley, 2004, Chromosoma)
- Structure of msj-1 gene in mice and humans: a possible role in the regulation of male reproduction.(R. Meccariello, G. Berruti, R. Chianese, R. De Santis, F. Di Cunto, D. Scarpa, G. Cobellis, I. Zucchetti, R. Pierantoni, F. Altruda, S. Fasano, 2008, General and Comparative Endocrinology)
- JoVE Video Dataset(Ferdusy Dia, Tierra Strange, Jenny Liang, Jacob Hamilton, Karen M. Berkowitz, 2017, Journal of Visualized Experiments)
本报告通过对雄性小鼠减数分裂高分研究进行逻辑整合,将研究体系划分为六大核心领域:从减数分裂起始的基因程序控制,到PRDM9驱动的热点特异性识别,涵盖了重组与DNA损伤修复的复杂机制,并系统性总结了染色质重塑与表观遗传的动态调节过程。此外,报告还涵盖了减数分裂细胞周期监控、遗传异质性及演化机制,为理解雄性生殖细胞如何确保遗传稳定性与多样性提供了综合的研究架构。
总计114篇相关文献
… meiotic recombination, such as chromosome structure, that influences meiotic recombination… To bridge this gap, we have generated the first cytological recombination map that identifies …
Humans suffer from high rates of fetal aneuploidy, often arising from the absence of meiotic crossover recombination between homologous chromosomes. Meiotic recombination is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs) generated by the SPO11 transesterase. In yeast and worms, at least one buffering mechanism, crossover homeostasis, maintains crossover numbers despite variation in DSB numbers. We show here that mammals exhibit progressive homeostatic control of recombination. In wild-type mouse spermatocytes, focus numbers for early recombination proteins (RAD51, DMC1) were highly variable from cell to cell, whereas foci of the crossover marker MLH1 showed little variability. Furthermore, mice with greater or fewer copies of the Spo11 gene—with correspondingly greater or fewer numbers of early recombination foci—exhibited relatively invariant crossover numbers. Homeostatic control is enforced during at least two stages, after the formation of early recombination intermediates and later while these intermediates mature towards crossovers. Thus, variability within the mammalian meiotic program is robustly managed by homeostatic mechanisms to control crossover formation, probably to suppress aneuploidy. Meiotic recombination exemplifies how order can be progressively implemented in a self-organizing system despite natural cell-to-cell disparities in the underlying biochemical processes.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) was assumed to be essential in the mammalian cell cycle both at the G1-S transition and throughout the S phase. Interestingly, ablation of Cdk2 in mice does not have substantial consequences for embryonic or postnatal development, but both males and females are infertile. In the present study, we have analysed the meiotic alterations leading to infertility in Cdk2–/– male mice. We have studied the distribution and dynamics of several proteins related to meiosis progression, such as synaptonemal complex proteins, cohesin complexes, and centromere-, telomere- and recombination-related proteins. Cdk2–/– spermatocytes show an incomplete chromosome pairing, an extensive non-homologous synapsis and arrest at a pachytene-like stage with unrepaired programmed double-strand breaks. In these spermatocytes, some telomeres do not attach to the nuclear envelope, and sex chromosomes do not form a sex body. Our data demonstrate an unpredicted participation of CDK2 in the accurate pairing and recombination between homologues during mammalian meiosis.
… meiotic recombination hot spot, in male and female mouse … (DSB) repair in mouse meiosis based on three observations: … to late pachytene of meiotic prophase and provide evidence …
Meiotic cells undergo genetic exchange between homologs through programmed DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation, recombination and synapsis. In mice, the DNA damage-regulated phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-like kinase (PIKK) ATM regulates all of these processes. However, the meiotic functions of the PIKK ATR have remained elusive, because germline-specific depletion of this kinase is challenging. Here we uncover roles for ATR in male mouse prophase I progression. ATR deletion causes chromosome axis fragmentation and germ cell elimination at mid pachynema. This elimination cannot be rescued by deletion of ATM and the third DNA damage-regulated PIKK, PRKDC, consistent with the existence of a PIKK-independent surveillance mechanism in the mammalian germline. ATR is required for synapsis, in a manner genetically dissociable from DSB formation. ATR also regulates loading of recombinases RAD51 and DMC1 to DSBs and recombination focus dynamics on synapsed and asynapsed chromosomes. Our studies reveal ATR as a critical regulator of mouse meiosis. ATR kinase is required for meiosis in non-mammalian model organisms. Here the authors demonstrate, using a tissue-specific knockout approach, that ATR is also essential for male meiosis in mouse, regulating meiotic recombination and synapsis.
Genetic background effects on the frequency of meiotic recombination have long been suspected in mice but never demonstrated in a systematic manner, especially in inbred strains. We used a recently described immunostaining technique to assess meiotic exchange patterns in male mice. We found that among four different inbred strains—CAST/Ei, A/J, C57BL/6, and SPRET/Ei—the mean number of meiotic exchanges per cell and, thus, the recombination rates in these genetic backgrounds were significantly different. These frequencies ranged from a low of 21.5 exchanges in CAST/Ei to a high of 24.9 in SPRET/Ei. We also found that, as expected, these crossover events were nonrandomly distributed and displayed positive interference. However, we found no evidence for significant differences in the patterns of crossover positioning between strains with different exchange frequencies. From our observations of >10,000 autosomal synaptonemal complexes, we conclude that achiasmate bivalents arise in the male mouse at a frequency of 0.1%. Thus, special mechanisms that segregate achiasmate chromosomes are unlikely to be an important component of mammalian male meiosis.
… mutation were sterile males. To further study recombination in the mouse pseudoautosomal … , the Mov-15 provirus carried in a transgenic mouse strain (9). We have previously shown …
Among mammals, genetic recombination occurs at highly delimited sites known as recombination hotspots. They are typically 1–2 kb long and vary as much as a 1,000-fold or more in recombination activity. Although much is known about the molecular details of the recombination process itself, the factors determining the location and relative activity of hotspots are poorly understood. To further our understanding, we have collected and mapped the locations of 5,472 crossover events along mouse Chromosome 1 arising in 6,028 meioses of male and female reciprocal F1 hybrids of C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ mice. Crossovers were mapped to a minimum resolution of 225 kb, and those in the telomere-proximal 24.7 Mb were further mapped to resolve individual hotspots. Recombination rates were evolutionarily conserved on a regional scale, but not at the local level. There was a clear negative-exponential relationship between the relative activity and abundance of hotspot activity classes, such that a small number of the most active hotspots account for the majority of recombination. Females had 1.2× higher overall recombination than males did, although the sex ratio showed considerable regional variation. Locally, entirely sex-specific hotspots were rare. The initiation of recombination at the most active hotspot was regulated independently on the two parental chromatids, and analysis of reciprocal crosses indicated that parental imprinting has subtle effects on recombination rates. It appears that the regulation of mammalian recombination is a complex, dynamic process involving multiple factors reflecting species, sex, individual variation within species, and the properties of individual hotspots.
… In male mouse meiosis, the density of MLH1 foci in the centromere-distal subtelomeric region is higher than average for the entire SC, and this is not due to a corresponding higher-than-…
… Here, we explore the threshold of XY recombination failure … fertility from other achiasmate mouse models and propose … Meiotic pairing, recombination, and synapsis between male …
The rate of meiotic recombination varies markedly between species and among individuals. Classical genetic experiments demonstrated a heritable component to population variation in recombination rate, and specific sequence variants that contribute to recombination rate differences between individuals have recently been identified. Despite these advances, the genetic basis of species divergence in recombination rate remains unexplored. Using a cytological assay that allows direct in situ imaging of recombination events in spermatocytes, we report a large (∼30%) difference in global recombination rate between males of two closely related house mouse subspecies (Mus musculus musculus and M. m. castaneus). To characterize the genetic basis of this recombination rate divergence, we generated an F2 panel of inter-subspecific hybrid males (n = 276) from an intercross between wild-derived inbred strains CAST/EiJ (M. m. castaneus) and PWD/PhJ (M. m. musculus). We uncover considerable heritable variation for recombination rate among males from this mapping population. Much of the F2 variance for recombination rate and a substantial portion of the difference in recombination rate between the parental strains is explained by eight moderate- to large-effect quantitative trait loci, including two transgressive loci on the X chromosome. In contrast to the rapid evolution observed in males, female CAST/EiJ and PWD/PhJ animals show minimal divergence in recombination rate (∼5%). The existence of loci on the X chromosome suggests a genetic mechanism to explain this male-biased evolution. Our results provide an initial map of the genetic changes underlying subspecies differences in genome-scale recombination rate and underscore the power of the house mouse system for understanding the evolution of this trait.
H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis.
… A phosphorylated form of H2AX, a histone H2A variant implicated in DNA repair, accumulates in the sex body in a manner independent of meiotic recombination-associated double-…
Meiotic recombination safeguards proper segregation of homologous chromosomes into gametes, affects genetic variation within species, and contributes to meiotic chromosome recognition, pairing and synapsis. The Prdm9 gene has a dual role, it controls meiotic recombination by determining the genomic position of crossover hotspots and, in infertile hybrids of house mouse subspecies Mus m. musculus (Mmm) and Mus m. domesticus (Mmd), it further functions as the major hybrid sterility gene. In the latter role Prdm9 interacts with the hybrid sterility X 2 (Hstx2) genomic locus on Chromosome X (Chr X) by a still unknown mechanism. Here we investigated the meiotic recombination rate at the genome-wide level and its possible relation to hybrid sterility. Using immunofluorescence microscopy we quantified the foci of MLH1 DNA mismatch repair protein, the cytological counterparts of reciprocal crossovers, in a panel of inter-subspecific chromosome substitution strains. Two autosomes, Chr 7 and Chr 11, significantly modified the meiotic recombination rate, yet the strongest modifier, designated meiotic recombination 1, Meir1, emerged in the 4.7 Mb Hstx2 genomic locus on Chr X. The male-limited transgressive effect of Meir1 on recombination rate parallels the male-limited transgressive role of Hstx2 in hybrid male sterility. Thus, both genetic factors, the Prdm9 gene and the Hstx2/Meir1 genomic locus, indicate a link between meiotic recombination and hybrid sterility. A strong female-specific modifier of meiotic recombination rate with the effect opposite to Meir1 was localized on Chr X, distally to Meir1. Mapping Meir1 to a narrow candidate interval on Chr X is an important first step towards positional cloning of the respective gene(s) responsible for variation in the global recombination rate between closely related mouse subspecies.
… of the mouse MHC (Fig. 1) has provided a valuable genetic system for the study of meiotic recombination. … The frequencies in male meiosis were as high as those in female meiosis. The …
Novel and diverse functions of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination
The mismatch repair (MMR) family is a highly conserved group of proteins that function in genome stabilization and mutation avoidance. Their role has been particularly well studied in the context of DNA repair following replication errors, and disruption of these processes results in characteristic microsatellite instability, repair defects and, in mammals, susceptibility to cancer. An additional role in meiotic recombination has been described for several family members, as revealed by extensive studies in yeast. More recently, the role of the mammalian MMR family in meiotic progression has been elucidated by the phenotypic analysis of mice harboring targeted mutations in the genes encoding several MMR family members. This review will discuss the phenotypes of the various mutant mouse lines and, drawing from our knowledge of MMR function in yeast meiosis and in somatic cell repair, will attempt to elucidate the significance of MMR activity in mouse germ cells. These studies highlight the importance of comparative analysis of MMR orthologs across species, and also underscore distinct sexually dimorphic characteristics of mammalian recombination and meiosis.
… also influence how meiotic recombination and progression … recent studies involving mouse mutants for meiosis, and will … initiation of recombination since the mice exhibit both male and …
Vertebrate meiotic recombination events are concentrated in regions (hotspots) that display open chromatin marks, such as trimethylation of lysines 4 and 36 of histone 3 (H3K4me3 and H3K36me3). Mouse and human PRDM9 proteins catalyze H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 and determine hotspot positions, whereas other vertebrates lacking PRDM9 recombine in regions with chromatin already opened for another function, such as gene promoters. While these other vertebrate species lacking PRDM9 remain fertile, inactivation of the mouse Prdm9 gene, which shifts the hotspots to the functional regions (including promoters), typically causes gross fertility reduction; and the reasons for these species differences are not clear. We introduced Prdm9 deletions into the Rattus norvegicus genome and generated the first rat genome-wide maps of recombination-initiating double-strand break hotspots. Rat strains carrying the same wild-type Prdm9 allele shared 88% hotspots but strains with different Prdm9 alleles only 3%. After Prdm9 deletion, rat hotspots relocated to functional regions, about 40% to positions corresponding to Prdm9-independent mouse hotspots, including promoters. Despite the hotspot relocation and decreased fertility, Prdm9-deficient rats of the SHR/OlaIpcv strain produced healthy offspring. The percentage of normal pachytene spermatocytes in SHR-Prdm9 mutants was almost double than in the PWD male mouse oligospermic sterile mutants. We previously found a correlation between the crossover rate and sperm presence in mouse Prdm9 mutants. The crossover rate of SHR is more similar to sperm-carrying mutant mice, but it did not fully explain the fertility of the SHR mutants. Besides mild meiotic arrests at rat tubular stages IV (mid-pachytene) and XIV (metaphase), we also detected postmeiotic apoptosis of round spermatids. We found delayed meiosis and age-dependent fertility in both sexes of the SHR mutants. We hypothesize that the relative increased fertility of rat versus mouse Prdm9 mutants could be ascribed to extended duration of meiotic prophase I. While rat PRDM9 shapes meiotic recombination landscapes, it is unnecessary for recombination. We suggest that PRDM9 has additional roles in spermatogenesis and speciation—spermatid development and reproductive age—that may help to explain male-specific hybrid sterility.
… present, and one can therefore study all stages of meiosis in a single preparation. Coupled with … we wish to present new data on meiosis in the mouse obtained with these methods. We …
ABSTRACT Precise control of chromosome dynamics during meiosis is critical for fertility. A gametocyte undergoing meiosis coordinates formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC) to promote efficient homologous chromosome recombination. Subsequent disassembly of the SC occurs prior to segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I. We examined the requirements of the mammalian Aurora kinases (AURKA, AURKB and AURKC) during SC disassembly and chromosome segregation using a combination of chemical inhibition and gene deletion approaches. We find that both mouse and human spermatocytes fail to disassemble SC lateral elements when the kinase activity of AURKB and AURKC are chemically inhibited. Interestingly, both Aurkb conditional knockout and Aurkc knockout mouse spermatocytes successfully progress through meiosis, and the mice are fertile. In contrast, Aurkb, Aurkc double knockout spermatocytes fail to coordinate disassembly of SC lateral elements with chromosome condensation and segregation, resulting in delayed meiotic progression. In addition, deletion of Aurkb and Aurkc leads to an accumulation of metaphase spermatocytes, chromosome missegregation and aberrant cytokinesis. Collectively, our data demonstrate that AURKB and AURKC functionally compensate for one another ensuring successful mammalian spermatogenesis. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper. Highlighted Article: Homologous chromosomes recombine and synapse during meiotic prophase. Aurora kinase B and C are important to coordinate chromosome desynapsis and segregation during mouse and human spermatogenesis.
Abstract Constitutive heterochromatin at the pericentric regions of chromosomes undergoes dynamic changes in its epigenetic and spatial organization during spermatogenesis. Accurate control of pericentric heterochromatin is required for meiotic cell divisions and production of fertile and epigenetically intact spermatozoa. In this study, we demonstrate that pericentric heterochromatin is expressed during mouse spermatogenesis to produce major satellite repeat (MSR) transcripts. We show that the endonuclease DICER localizes to the pericentric heterochromatin in the testis. Furthermore, DICER forms complexes with MSR transcripts, and their processing into small RNAs is compromised in Dicer1 knockout mice leading to an elevated level of MSR transcripts in meiotic cells. We also show that defective MSR forward transcript processing in Dicer1 cKO germ cells is accompanied with reduced recruitment of SUV39H2 and H3K9me3 to the pericentric heterochromatin and meiotic chromosome missegregation. Altogether, our results indicate that the physiological role of DICER in maintenance of male fertility extends to the regulation of pericentric heterochromatin through direct targeting of MSR transcripts.
Essential roles of the ANKRD31–REC114 interaction in meiotic recombination and mouse spermatogenesis
Significance Recombination between homologous chromosomes is essential for gamete formation in mammals. Recombination initiates with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), whose formation is tightly regulated. The vertebrate-specific ANKRD31 protein is an important part of this regulation in mice and humans and is particularly important for ensuring that the sex chromosomes in males can recombine. ANKRD31 interacts with many different proteins including the REC114 protein, but it has not been established whether these interactions are important for meiosis. We generated mice with targeted mutations in the Ankrd31 gene that reduce or eliminate the interaction with REC114 without altering interactions with the other known ANKRD31 partners. Analysis of these mice demonstrates that the ANKRD31–REC114 interaction is critical for all ANKRD31 functions in meiosis.
SUMMARY Meiotic homologous recombination (HR) is important for proper chromosomal segregation during gametogenesis and facilitates evolutionary adaptation via genomic reshuffling. In most eukaryotes, HR is mediated by two recombinases, the ubiquitous RAD51 and the meiosis-specific DMC1. The role of RAD51 in mammalian meiosis is unclear and study of its function is limited due to embryonic lethality of RAD51 knockouts. Here, we developed an in-vivo meiotic knockdown and protein complementation system to study RAD51 during mouse spermatogenesis. We show that RAD51 is crucial during meiotic prophase and its loss leads to depletion of late prophase I spermatocytes through a p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. This phenotype is distinct from that observed in the DMC1 knockdown. Our meiotic knockdown and complementation system establishes an experimental platform for mechanistic studies of meiotic proteins with unknown functions or essential genes for which a testis-specific knockout is not possible.
… We performed a detailed examination of the localization of RAD21/SCC1 on chromosome spreads of mouse spermatocytes by immunostaining using two independent polyclonal …
Summary Faithful chromosome segregation in meiosis requires crossover (CO) recombination, which is regulated to ensure at least one CO per homolog pair. We investigate failure to ensure COs in juvenile male mice. By monitoring recombination genome-wide using cytological assays and at hotspots using molecular assays, we show that juvenile mouse spermatocytes have fewer COs relative to adults. Analysis of recombination in the absence of MLH3 provides evidence for greater utilization in juveniles of pathways involving structure-selective nucleases and/or alternative complexes, which can act upon precursors to generate noncrossovers (NCOs) at the expense of COs. We propose that some designated CO sites fail to mature efficiently in juveniles owing to inappropriate activity of these alternative repair pathways, leading to chromosome mis-segregation. We also find lower MutLγ focus density in juvenile human spermatocytes, suggesting that weaker CO maturation efficiency may explain why younger men have higher risk of fathering children with Down syndrome.
Sex chromosomes are the Achilles' heel of male meiosis in mammals. Mis‐segregation of the X and Y chromosomes leads to sex chromosome aneuploidies, with clinical outcomes such as infertility and Klinefelter syndrome. Successful meiotic divisions require that all chromosomes find their homologous partner and achieve recombination and pairing. Sex chromosomes in males of many species have only a small region of homology (the pseudoautosomal region, PAR) that enables pairing. Until recently, little was known about the dynamics of recombination and pairing within mammalian X and Y PARs. Here, we review our recent findings on PAR behavior in mouse meiosis. We uncovered unexpected differences between autosomal chromosomes and the X–Y chromosome pair, namely that PAR recombination and pairing occurs later, and is under different genetic control. These findings imply that spermatocytes have evolved distinct strategies that ensure successful X–Y recombination and chromosome segregation.
… of kinetochores in spermatogenesis in the laboratory mouse. … a constant segment of the mouse chromosome which can be … the segregation of a haploid complement of chromosomes …
… spermatocytes of F, hybrids, each metacentric chromosome … two homologous acrocentric chromosomes derived from the … Y chromosomes, about 4% of the total haploid mouse genome, …
… the mouse testis is expressed in somatic cells and germ cells until pachytene spermatocytes… (SAC) to ensure the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Proteins involved in SAC include …
The spindle checkpoint is a key regulator of chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Its function is to prevent precocious anaphase onset before chromosomes have achieved bipolar attachment to the spindle. The spindle checkpoint comprises a complex set of signaling pathways that integrate microtubule dynamics, biomechanical forces at the kinetochores, and intricate regulation of protein interactions and post‐translational modifications. Historically, many key observations that gave rise to the initial concepts of the spindle checkpoint were made in meiotic systems. In contrast with mitosis, the two distinct chromosome segregation events of meiosis present a special challenge for the regulation of checkpoint signaling. Preservation of fidelity in chromosome segregation in meiosis, controlled by the spindle checkpoint, also has a significant impact in human health. This review highlights the contributions from meiotic systems in understanding the spindle checkpoint as well as the role of checkpoint signaling in controlling the complex divisions of meiosis.
Early in the process of speciation, reproductive failures occur in hybrid animals between genetically diverged populations. The sterile hybrid animals are often males in mammals and they exhibit spermatogenic disruptions, resulting in decreased number and/or malformation of mature sperms. Despite the generality of this phenomenon, comparative study of phenotypes in hybrid males from various crosses has not been done, and therefore the comprehensive genetic basis of the disruption is still elusive. In this study, we characterized the spermatogenic phenotype especially during meiosis in four different cases of reproductive isolation: B6-ChrXMSM, PGN-ChrXMSM, (B6 × Mus musculus musculus-NJL/Ms) F1, and (B6 × Mus spretus) F1. The first two are consomic strains, both bearing the X chromosome of M. m. molossinus; in B6-ChrXMSM, the genetic background is the laboratory strain C57BL/6J (predominantly M. m. domesticus), while in PGN-ChrXMSM the background is the PGN2/Ms strain purely derived from wild M. m. domesticus. The last two cases are F1 hybrids between mouse subspecies or species. Each of the hybrid males exhibited cell-cycle arrest and/or apoptosis at either one or two of three distinct meiotic stages: premeiotic stage, zygotene-to-pachytene stage of prophase I, and metaphase I. This study shows that the sterility in hybrid males is caused by spermatogenic disruptions at multiple stages, suggesting that the responsible genes function in different cellular processes. Furthermore, the stages with disruptions are not correlated with the genetic distance between the respective parental strains.
Differentiation of primordial germ cells into mature spermatozoa proceeds through multiple stages, one of the most important of which is meiosis. Meiotic recombination is in turn a key part of meiosis. To achieve the highly specialized and diverse functions necessary for the successful completion of meiosis and the generation of spermatozoa thousands of genes are coordinately regulated through spermatogenesis. A complete and unbiased characterization of the transcriptome dynamics of spermatogenesis is, however, still lacking. In order to characterize gene expression during spermatogenesis we sequenced eight mRNA samples from testes of juvenile mice from 6 to 38 days post partum. Using gene expression clustering we defined over 1,000 novel meiotically-expressed genes. We also developed a computational de-convolution approach and used it to estimate cell type-specific gene expression in pre-meiotic, meiotic and post-meiotic cells. In addition, we detected 13,000 novel alternative splicing events around 40% of which preserve an open reading frame, and found experimental support for 159 computational gene predictions. A comparison of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) ChIP-Seq signals with RNA-Seq coverage shows that gene expression correlates well with Pol II signals, both at promoters and along the gene body. However, we observe numerous instances of non-canonical promoter usage, as well as intergenic Pol II peaks that potentially delineate unannotated promoters, enhancers or small RNA clusters. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis of gene expression throughout mouse meiosis and spermatogenesis. Importantly, we find over a thousand of novel meiotic genes and over 5,000 novel potentially coding isoforms. These data should be a valuable resource for future studies of meiosis and spermatogenesis in mammals.
The nuclear organization of spermatocytes in meiotic prophase I is primarily determined by the synaptic organization of the bivalents that are bound by their telomeres to the nuclear envelope and described as arc-shaped trajectories through the 3D nuclear space. However, over this basic meiotic organization, a spermatocyte nuclear architecture arises that is based on higher-ordered patterns of spatial associations among chromosomal domains from different bivalents that are conditioned by the individual characteristics of chromosomes and the opportunity for interactions between their domains. Consequently, the nuclear architecture is species-specific and prone to modification by chromosomal rearrangements. This model is valid for the localization of any chromosomal domain in the meiotic prophase nucleus. However, constitutive heterochromatin plays a leading role in shaping nuclear territories. Thus, the nuclear localization of nucleoli depends on the position of NORs in nucleolar bivalents, but the association among nucleolar chromosomes mainly depends on the presence of constitutive heterochromatin that does not affect the expression of the ribosomal genes. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleoli form complex nuclear territories whose distribution in the nuclear space is nonrandom, supporting the hypothesis regarding the existence of a species-specific nuclear architecture in first meiotic prophase spermatocytes.
Male gametes are generated through a specialised differentiation pathway involving a series of developmental transitions that are poorly characterised at the molecular level. Here, we use droplet-based single-cell RNA-Sequencing to profile spermatogenesis in adult animals and at multiple stages during juvenile development. By exploiting the first wave of spermatogenesis, we both precisely stage germ cell development and enrich for rare somatic cell-types and spermatogonia. To capture the full complexity of spermatogenesis including cells that have low transcriptional activity, we apply a statistical tool that identifies previously uncharacterised populations of leptotene and zygotene spermatocytes. Focusing on post-meiotic events, we characterise the temporal dynamics of X chromosome re-activation and profile the associated chromatin state using CUT&RUN. This identifies a set of genes strongly repressed by H3K9me3 in spermatocytes, which then undergo extensive chromatin remodelling post-meiosis, thus acquiring an active chromatin state and spermatid-specific expression. The transcriptional regulation of murine spermatogenesis is not well understood. Here, the authors use single-cell and bulk RNA-Sequencing of juvenile and adult mice to characterise somatic and germ cell development, and chromatin profile the X chromosome to show that spermatid-specific genes are repressed by H3K9me3 during meiosis.
… we demonstrate an optimized technique on mouse spermatocytes that was first described in 1997… in a hypotonic solution to swell spermatocytes. Then spermatocytes are released into a …
Developmental constraint and sexual conflict shape the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. These contrasting forces are perhaps strongest during spermatogenesis in species with XY males. In this review, we consider how the unique regulatory environment and selective pressures of spermatogenesis interact to impact sex chromosome evolution in mammals. We explore how each developmental phase of spermatogenesis influences sex chromosome gene content, structure, and rate of molecular evolution, and how these attributes may contribute to speciation. We argue that a developmental context is fundamental to understanding sex chromosome evolution and that an evolutionary perspective can shed new light on our understanding of sperm development.
In mouse fetal gonads, retinoic acid (RA) induces meiosis in the female germ cells, whereas the male germ cells never enter meiosis due to Cyp26b1-mediated RA metabolism. We show here that Nanos2 plays critical roles in the differentiation of male germ cells. We find that Nanos2 maintains the suppression of meiosis by preventing Stra8 expression, which is required for premeiotic DNA replication, after Cyp26b1 is decreased. We also demonstrate that Nanos2 activates a male-specific genetic program, which is supported by the inhibition of meiosis and the induction of male-type differentiation in female germ cells following the forced expression of Nanos2.
… range of male germ cell fate markers in XY Cyp26b1 null gonads at 15.5 dpc. No expression of male germ cell fate markers Nanos2, Dnmt3L, or Tdrd1 was detected in germ cells of the …
Mammalian gametogenesis provides a unique system in which to study cell-cycle regulation. Furthermore, understanding the genetic program controlling the mitotic and meiotic divisions of the germ line will provide insight into understanding infertility and new directions for contraception. Male and female germ cells have stages of cell-cycle regulation in common, including a mitotic proliferative stage, entry into meiosis, completion of a reductive division, and entry into a quiescent state awaiting signals at fertilization. However, the timing of these events - and, indeed, even the stage of development at which these events occurs - differs in the two sexes. The genes involved in controlling these specialized mitotic and meiotic cycles of mammalian germ cell differentiation are only now being identified. They include a complex array of kinases, phosphatases, regulatory proteins (e.g., cyclins), and an equally complex array of substrates, including components of the nuclear and cytoplasmic structures involved in cell division. This chapter provides an overview of our current understanding of cell-cycle regulation in mammalian mitotic cells and the importance of restriction points. A summary of observations regarding the expression of various cell-cycle regulatory genes in mouse gametes is provided, along with comments on interesting differences between mitotic and meiotic cells. Finally, the role of the novel A-type cyclin, cyclin A1, during male meiosis is discussed in depth.
… [30] that this Y-encoded human protein is found only in late stage germ cells, spermatids, and spermatozoa. Spermatids and spermatozoa are the only male germ cells in which we do …
… To explore the role of cyclin A1 in the initiation of MPF activation and G2–M transition in male germ cells, we examined its potential functional interaction with the Cdc25 protein …
… cells. The main focus of this review is the differentiation of male germ cells, and more precisely, the meiotic … It was the first report of male germ cells having entered meiotic prophase in …
… What appears, however, as their potentially most useful property is the ability to support the meiotic and postmeiotic differentiation of normal germ cells in culture. Introduction …
Formation of the male gamete occurs in sequential mitotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic phases. Many germ cell-specific transcripts are produced during this process. Their expression is developmentally regulated and stage specific. Some of these transcripts are product of genes that are male germ cell-specific homologs of genes expressed in somatic cells, while some are expressed from unique genes unlike any others in the genome. Others are alternate transcripts derived from the same gene as transcripts in somatic cells but differing from them in size and/or overall sequence. They are generated during gene expression by using promoters and transcription factors that activate transcription at different start sites upstream or downstream of the usual site, by incorporation of alternate exons, by germ cell-specific splicing events, and by using alternate initiation sites for polyadenylation. Male germ cell development consists of an assortment of unique processes, including meiosis, genetic recombination, haploid gene expression, formation of the acrosome and flagellum, and remodeling and condensation of the chromatin. These processes are intricate, highly ordered, and require novel gene products and a precise and well-coordinated program of gene expression to occur. The regulation of gene expression in male germ cells occurs at three levels: intrinsic, interactive, and extrinsic. A highly conserved genetic program "intrinsic" to germ cells determines the sequence of events that underlies germ cell development. This has been underscored by recent studies showing that meiosis involves many genes that have been conserved during evolution from yeast to man. During meiosis and other processes unique to germ cells, the intrinsic program determines which genes are utilized and when they are expressed. In the postmeiotic phase, it coordinates the expression of genes whose products are responsible for constructing the sperm. The process of spermatogenesis occurs in overlapping waves, with cohorts of germ cells developing in synchrony. The intrinsic program operating within a particular germ cell requires information from and provides information to neighboring cells to achieve this coordination. Sertoli cells are crucial for this "interactive" process as well as for providing essential support for germ cell proliferation and progression through the phases of development. The interactive level of regulation is dependent on "extrinsic" influences, primarily testosterone and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Studies during the last 4 years have established that FSH is not essential for germ cell development but instead serves an important supportive role for this process. While testosterone is essential for maintenance of spermatogenesis, it acts on Sertoli cells and peritubular cells and has indirect effects on germ cells. The extrinsic and interactive processes are extremely important for establishing and maintaining an optimum environment within which gametogenesis occurs. Nevertheless, an intrinsic evolutionarily conserved genetic program regulates male germ cell gene expression and development.
… of male germ cells; the XX sex-reversed mice are sterile males and germ cells are completely … inhibition of ribosomal RNA synthesis occurs in male germ cells during meiotic prophase. …
… is repressed by meiotic silencing. After meiosis, male germ cells undergo chromatin remodeling, including histone-to-protamine replacement. Male and female germ cells are also …
… The meiotic abnormalities do not indicate a role for Dnmt3L during normal chromosome … in meiotic cells, and at the end of the reproductive life span normal meiotic male germ cells can …
… germ cells from both female and male mouse embryos have the potential to cease proliferation and enter meiotic … , approximately 6 days, or 9 cell doubling times, after lineage restriction …
During spermatogenesis, diploid stem cells differentiate, undergo meiosis, and transform into haploid spermatozoa. As this precisely timed series of events proceeds, chromosomal ploidy is reduced and the nucleosomes of the chromatin are replaced by a transcriptionally quiescent protamine-containing nucleus. The premature termination of transcription during the haploid phase of spermatogenesis necessitates an especially prominent role for posttranscriptional regulation in the temporal and spatial expression of many testis-specific proteins and isozymes. In this review article, discussion will focus on novel mechanisms regulating gene expression in mammalian male germ cells from genome to protein.
… We propose that the recombination checkpoint functions in male germ cells to promote repair of meiotic recombination intermediates, thereby improving the fidelity of chromosome …
Developmental acquisition of genome-wide DNA methylation occurs prior to meiosis in male germ cells.
The development of germ cells is a highly ordered process that begins during fetal growth and is completed in the adult. Epigenetic modifications that occur in germ cells are important for germ cell function and for post-fertilization embryonic development. We have previously shown that male germ cells in the adult mouse have a highly distinct epigenetic state, as revealed by a unique genome-wide pattern of DNA methylation. Although it is known that these patterns begin to be established during fetal life, it is not known to what extent DNA methylation is modified during spermatogenesis. We have used restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) and other techniques to examine DNA methylation at multiple sites across the genome during postnatal germ cell development in the mouse. Although a significant proportion of the distinct germ cell pattern is acquired prior to the type A spermatogonial stage, we find that both de novo methylation and demethylation occur during spermatogenesis, mainly in spermatogonia and spermatocytes in early meiotic prophase I. Alterations include predominantly non-CpG island sequences from both unique loci and repetitive elements. These modifications are progressive and are almost exclusively completed by the end of the pachytene spermatocyte stage. These studies better define the developmental timing of genome-wide DNA methylation pattern acquisition during male germ cell development.
NANOS2 is an RNA-binding protein essential for fetal male germ cell development. While we have shown that the function of NANOS2 is vital for suppressing meiosis in embryonic XY germ cells, it is still unknown whether NANOS2 plays other roles in the sexual differentiation of male germ cells. In this study, we addressed the issue by generating Nanos2/Stra8 double knockout (dKO) mice, whereby meiosis was prohibited in the double-mutant male germ cells. We found that the expression of male-specific genes, which was decreased in the Nanos2 mutant, was hardly recovered in the dKO embryo, suggesting that NANOS2 plays a role in male gene expression other than suppression of meiosis. To investigate the molecular events that may be controlled by NANOS2, we conducted a series of microarray analyses to search putative targets of NANOS2 that fulfilled 2 criteria: (1) increased expression in the Nanos2 mutant and (2) the mRNA associated with NANOS2. Interestingly, the genes predominantly expressed in undifferentiated primordial germ cells (PGCs) were significantly selected, implying the involvement of NANOS2 in the termination of the characteristics of PGCs. Furthermore, we showed that NANOS2 is required for the maintenance of mitotic quiescence, but not for the initiation of the quiescence in fetal male germ cells. These results suggest that NANOS2 is not merely a suppressor of meiosis, but instead plays pivotal roles in the sexual differentiation of male germ cells.
… lines of knockout (KO) mice lacking histone lysine … meiotic prophase progression. We also present evidence for the genome-wide dynamics of H3K9 methylation in the meiotic prophase, …
… intact cohesin complex is essential for progression through prophase I of meiosis. Smc1β −/− male and female mice are sterile as a result of meiotic failure during pachynema and early …
The correct sequence of meiotic prophase development in the male mouse has been established by the use of pubertal males. The first wave of spermatogenesis at this time provides a unique opportunity to study progressive meiotic development in a direct way. Air-dried and micro-spread analyses have been carried out. Temporal and morphological progression at this time is entirely consistent with that occurring in the later waves of meiosis of the adult male. Morphological detail shows delayed pairing of the X and Y chromosomes relative to the autosomes. The longest XY synaptonemal complex is seen in early pachytene cells, occupying up to 72% of the length of the Y and 22% of the length of the X axis. By late pachytene, end-to-end pairing in the XY bivalent is established, the autosomal axes remaining fully paired. Desynapsis of the autosomes commences at early diplotene. A 'diffuse' diplotene stage in the male, comparable to the dictyate stage of the female, could not be found. Marked lengthening of the XY and autosomal axes did, however, occur through the diplotene stage.
The meiosis-specific chromosomal events of homolog pairing, synapsis, and recombination occur over an extended meiotic prophase I that is many times longer than prophase of mitosis. Here we show that, in mice, maintenance of an extended meiotic prophase I requires the gene Meioc, a germ-cell specific factor conserved in most metazoans. In mice, Meioc is expressed in male and female germ cells upon initiation of and throughout meiotic prophase I. Mouse germ cells lacking Meioc initiate meiosis: they undergo pre-meiotic DNA replication, they express proteins involved in synapsis and recombination, and a subset of cells progress as far as the zygotene stage of prophase I. However, cells in early meiotic prophase—as early as the preleptotene stage—proceed to condense their chromosomes and assemble a spindle, as if having progressed to metaphase. Meioc-deficient spermatocytes that have initiated synapsis mis-express CYCLIN A2, which is normally expressed in mitotic spermatogonia, suggesting a failure to properly transition to a meiotic cell cycle program. MEIOC interacts with YTHDC2, and the two proteins pull-down an overlapping set of mitosis-associated transcripts. We conclude that when the meiotic chromosomal program is initiated, Meioc is simultaneously induced so as to extend meiotic prophase. Specifically, MEIOC, together with YTHDC2, promotes a meiotic (as opposed to mitotic) cell cycle program via post-transcriptional control of their target transcripts.
The histone modification reader ZCWPW1 guides male meiosis prophase I. Meiosis is a specialized type of cell division that creates haploid germ cells and ensures their genetic diversity through homologous recombination. We show that the H3K4me3 reader ZCWPW1 is specifically required for meiosis prophase I progression in male but not in female germ cells in mice. Loss of Zcwpw1 in male mice caused a complete failure of synapsis, resulting in meiotic arrest at the zygotene to pachytene stage, accompanied by incomplete DNA double-strand break repair and lack of crossover formation, leading to male infertility. In oocytes, deletion of Zcwpw1 only somewhat slowed down meiosis prophase I progression; Zcwpw1−/− oocytes were able to complete meiosis, and Zcwpw1−/− female mice had normal fertility until mid-adulthood. We conclude that the H3K4me3 reader ZCWPW1 is indispensable for meiosis synapsis in males but is dispensable for females. Our results suggest that ZCWPW1 may represent a previously unknown, sex-dependent epigenetic regulator of germ cell meiosis in mammals.
During spermatogenesis, meiosis is accompanied by a robust alteration in gene expression and chromatin status. However, it remains elusive how the meiotic transcriptional program is established to ensure completion of meiotic prophase. Here, we identify a protein complex that consists of germ-cell-specific zinc-finger protein ZFP541 and its interactor KCTD19 as the key transcriptional regulators in mouse meiotic prophase progression. Our genetic study shows that ZFP541 and KCTD19 are co-expressed from pachytene onward and play an essential role in the completion of the meiotic prophase program in the testis. Furthermore, our ChIP-seq and transcriptome analyses identify that ZFP541 binds to and suppresses a broad range of genes whose function is associated with biological processes of transcriptional regulation and covalent chromatin modification. The present study demonstrates that a germ-cell specific complex that contains ZFP541 and KCTD19 promotes the progression of meiotic prophase towards completion in male mice, and triggers the reconstruction of the transcriptional network and chromatin organization leading to post-meiotic development. The authors add to our knowledge of the transcriptional regulation of the meiotic program in mice spermatocytes, showing ZFP541 regulates meiotic prophase and transition to the division phase by being the target for upstream factors MEIOSIN/STRA8.
… chromatin modifications in meiotic mammalian cells, … meiosis-specific events that occur during meiotic prophase. This review will discuss the role of chromatin modifications in meiotic …
SUMMARY Telomere-led rapid prophase movements (RPMs) in meiotic prophase have been observed in diverse eukaryote species. A shared feature of RPMs is that the force that drives the chromosomal movements is transmitted from the cytoskeleton, through the nuclear envelope, to the telomeres. Studies in mice suggested that dynein movement along microtubules is transmitted to telomeres through SUN1/KASH5 nuclear envelope bridges to generate RPMs. We monitored RPMs in mouse seminiferous tubules using four-dimensional fluorescence imaging and quantitative motion analysis to characterize patterns of movement in the RPM process. We find that RPMs reflect a combination of nuclear rotation and individual chromosome movements. The telomeres move along microtubule tracks which are apparently continuous with the cytoskeletal network, and exhibit characteristic arrangements at different stages of prophase. Quantitative measurements confirmed that SUN1/KASH5, microtubules, and dynein but not actin were necessary for RPMs and that defects in meiotic recombination and synapsis resulted in altered RPMs.
… in prophase I spermatocytes and meiotic progression from … accelerates the progression of cells through late prophase I. … useful tool for the study of mammalian prophase I dynamics. …
… Meiotic chromosome spread from mouse spermatocyte in pachynema depicting MSCI. The XY … -dependent coordination hub for the step-by-step progression through meiotic prophase. …
… Male homozygotes were sterile, displaying arrest in the first meiotic prophase at … mice are investigated in molecular and biological detail. Mutant spermatocytes show defects in meiotic …
The MLH1 protein is required for normal meiosis in mice and its absence leads to failure in maintenance of pairing between bivalent chromosomes, abnormal meiotic division, and ensuing sterility in both sexes. In this study, we investigated whether failure to develop foci of MLH1 protein on chromosomes in prophase would lead to elimination of prophase spermatocytes, and, if not, whether univalent chromosomes could align normally on the meiotic spindle and whether metaphase spermatocytes would be delayed and/or eliminated. In spite of the absence of MLH1 foci, no apoptosis of spermatocytes in prophase was detected. In fact, chromosomes of pachytene spermatocytes from Mlh1(-/-) mice were competent to condense metaphase chromosomes, both in vivo and in vitro. Most condensed chromosomes were univalents with spatially distinct FISH signals. Typical metaphase events, such as synaptonemal complex breakdown and the phosphorylation of Ser10 on histone H3, occurred in Mlh1(-/-) spermatocytes, suggesting that there is no inhibition of onset of meiotic metaphase in the face of massive chromosomal abnormalities. However, the condensed univalent chromosomes did not align correctly onto the spindle apparatus in the majority of Mlh1(-/-) spermatocytes. Most meiotic metaphase spermatocytes were characterized with bipolar spindles, but chromosomes radiated away from the microtubule-organizing centers in a prometaphase-like pattern rather than achieving a bipolar orientation. Apoptosis was not observed until after the onset of meiotic metaphase. Thus, spermatocytes are not eliminated in direct response to the initial meiotic defect, but are eliminated later. Taken together, these observations suggest that a spindle assembly checkpoint, rather than a recombination or chiasmata checkpoint, may be activated in response to meiotic errors, thereby ensuring elimination of chromosomally abnormal gamete precursors.
Meiosis is a critical step for spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Meiosis commences with pre-meiotic S phase that is subsequently followed by meiotic prophase. The meiotic prophase is characterized by the meiosis-specific chromosomal events such as chromosome recombination and homolog synapsis. Meiosis initiator (MEIOSIN) and stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8 (STRA8) initiates meiosis by activating the meiotic genes by installing the meiotic prophase program at pre-meiotic S phase. This review highlights the mechanisms of meiotic initiation and meiotic prophase progression from the point of the gene expression program and its relevance to infertility. Furthermore, upstream pathways that regulate meiotic initiation will be discussed in the context of spermatogenic development, indicating the sexual differences in the mode of meiotic entry.
… meiotic initiation with cell cycle, by activating the meiotic genes to have meiotic prophase … This review mainly focuses on the mechanism of meiotic initiation in mouse germ cells from …
PR domain-containing protein 9 (PRDM9) is a major regulator of the localization of meiotic recombination hotspots in the human and mouse genomes. This role involves its DNA-binding domain, which is composed of a tandem array of zinc fingers, and PRDM9-dependent trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4. PRDM9 is a member of the PRDM family of transcription regulators, but unlike other family members, it contains a Krüppel-associated box (KRAB)-related domain that is predicted to be a potential protein interaction domain. Here, we show that truncation of the KRAB domain of mouse PRDM9 leads to loss of PRDM9 function and altered meiotic prophase and gametogenesis. In addition, we identified proteins that interact with the KRAB domain of PRDM9 in yeast two-hybrid assay screens, particularly CXXC1, a member of the COMPASS complex. We also show that CXXC1 interacts with IHO1, an essential component of the meiotic double-strand break (DSB) machinery. As CXXC1 is orthologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spp1 that links DSB sites to the DSB machinery on the chromosome axis, we propose that these molecular interactions involved in the regulation of meiotic DSB formation are conserved in mouse meiosis.
Meiotic recombination is initiated by SPO11-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs). In most mammals, the methyltransferase PRDM9 guides SPO11 targeting, and the ATM kinase controls meiotic DSB numbers. Following MRE11 nuclease removal of SPO11, the DSB is resected and loaded with DMC1 filaments for homolog invasion. Here, we demonstrate the direct detection of meiotic DSBs and resection using END-seq on mouse spermatocytes with low sample input. We find that DMC1 limits both minimum and maximum resection lengths, whereas 53BP1, BRCA1 and EXO1 play surprisingly minimal roles. Through enzymatic modifications to END-seq, we identify a SPO11-bound meiotic recombination intermediate (SPO11-RI) present at all hotspots. We propose that SPO11-RI forms because chromatin-bound PRDM9 asymmetrically blocks MRE11 from releasing SPO11. In Atm–/– spermatocytes, trapped SPO11 cleavage complexes accumulate due to defective MRE11 initiation of resection. Thus, in addition to governing SPO11 breakage, ATM and PRDM9 are critical local regulators of mammalian SPO11 processing. Recombination requires DNA break formation by SPO11, following which SPO11 is thought to be released. Here, the authors show that meiotic hotspots retain SPO11 through a recombination intermediate dependent on the methyltransferase PRDM9, and that the ATM kinase governs the release of SPO11.
Developmental progress of germ cells through meiotic phases is closely tied to ongoing meiotic recombination. In mammals, recombination preferentially occurs in genomic regions known as hotspots; the protein that activates these hotspots is PRDM9, containing a genetically variable zinc finger (ZNF) domain and a PR-SET domain with histone H3K4 trimethyltransferase activity. PRDM9 is required for fertility in mice, but little is known about its localization and developmental dynamics. Application of spermatogenic stage-specific markers demonstrates that PRDM9 accumulates in male germ cell nuclei at pre-leptonema to early leptonema but is no longer detectable in nuclei by late zygonema. By the pachytene stage, PRDM9-dependent histone H3K4 trimethyl marks on hotspots also disappear. PRDM9 localizes to nuclei concurrently with the deposition of meiotic cohesin complexes, but is not required for incorporation of cohesin complex proteins into chromosomal axial elements, or accumulation of normal numbers of RAD51 foci on meiotic chromatin by late zygonema. Germ cells lacking PRDM9 exhibit inefficient homology recognition and synapsis, with aberrant repair of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks and transcriptional abnormalities characteristic of meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin. Together, these results on the developmental time course for nuclear localization of PRDM9 establish its direct window of function and demonstrate the independence of chromosome axial element formation from the concurrent PRDM9-mediated activation of recombination hotspots.
Summary Meiotic recombination is required for correct segregation of chromosomes to gametes and to generate genetic diversity. In mice and humans, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are initiated by SPO11 at recombination hotspots activated by PRDM9-catalyzed histone modifications on open chromatin. However, the DSB-initiating and repair proteins are associated with a linear proteinaceous scaffold called the chromosome axis, the core of which is composed of cohesin proteins. STAG3 is a stromalin subunit common to all meiosis-specific cohesin complexes. Mutations of meiotic cohesin proteins, especially STAG3, perturb both axis formation and recombination in the mouse, prompting determination of how the processes are mechanistically related. Protein interaction and genetic analyses revealed that PRDM9 interacts with STAG3 and REC8 in cooperative relationships that promote normal levels of meiotic DSBs at recombination hotspots in spermatocytes. The efficacy of the Prdm9-Stag3 genetic interaction in promoting DSB formation depends on PRDM9-mediated histone methyltransferase activity. Moreover, STAG3 deficiency has a major effect on DSB number even in the absence of PRDM9, showing that its role is not restricted to canonical PRDM9-activated hotspots. STAG3 and REC8 promote axis localization of the DSB-promoting proteins HORMAD1, IHO1, and MEI4, as well as SPO11 activity. These results establish that PRDM9 and axis-associated cohesin complexes together coordinate and facilitate meiotic recombination by recruiting key proteins for initiation of DSBs, thereby associating activated hotspots with DSB-initiating complexes on the axis.
Sex-specific modulation of a meiotic DNA damage checkpoint limits the requirement for PRDM9 in mammalian fertility. In many mammals, genomic sites for recombination are determined by the histone methyltransferase PRMD9. Some mouse strains lacking PRDM9 are infertile, but instances of fertility or semifertility in the absence of PRDM9 have been reported in mice, canines, and a human female. Such findings raise the question of how the loss of PRDM9 is circumvented to maintain fertility. We show that genetic background and sex-specific modifiers can obviate the requirement for PRDM9 in mice. Specifically, the meiotic DNA damage checkpoint protein CHK2 acts as a modifier allowing female-specific fertility in the absence of PRDM9. We also report that, in the absence of PRDM9, a PRDM9-independent recombination system is compatible with female meiosis and fertility, suggesting sex-specific regulation of meiotic recombination, a finding with implications for speciation.
Meiotic recombination hotspots activated by PRDM9 are associated with the chromosomal axis and synaptonemal complex via their interaction with other proteins, including CDYL, EHMT2, EWSR1, and CXXC1.
… similarly retained in Prdm9 −/− Tg(YF) spermatocytes. To … We propose that the PRDM9 key function in regulating DSB … are regulated through the selection of a subset of PRDM9-…
… Prdm9 −/− spermatocytes and oocytes exhibit impaired DSB repair during the pachytene stage and undergo cell death before completing meiosis. … action of PRDM9 in specifying meiotic …
A hallmark of meiosis is the rearrangement of parental alleles to ensure genetic diversity in the gametes. These chromosome rearrangements are mediated by the repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as genetic crossovers between parental homologs. In mice, humans, and many other mammals, meiotic DSBs occur primarily at hotspots, determined by sequence-specific binding of the PRDM9 protein. Without PRDM9, meiotic DSBs occur near gene promoters and other functional sites. Studies in a limited number of mouse strains showed that functional PRDM9 is required to complete meiosis, but despite its apparent importance, Prdm9 has been repeatedly lost across many animal lineages. Both the reason for mouse sterility in the absence of PRDM9 and the mechanism by which Prdm9 can be lost remain unclear. Here, we explore whether mice can tolerate the loss of Prdm9. By generating Prdm9 functional knockouts in an array of genetic backgrounds, we observe a wide range of fertility phenotypes and ultimately demonstrate that PRDM9 is not required for completion of male meiosis. Although DSBs still form at a common subset of functional sites in all mice lacking PRDM9, meiotic outcomes differ substantially. We speculate that DSBs at functional sites are difficult to repair as a crossover and that by increasing the efficiency of crossover formation at these sites, genetic modifiers of recombination rates can allow for meiotic progression. This model implies that species with a sufficiently high recombination rate may lose Prdm9 yet remain fertile.
Reduced fertility of male mouse hybrids relative to their parents, or hybrid sterility, is governed by the hybrid sterility 1 (Hst1) locus. Rescue experiments with transgenes carrying sequences within or near Hst1 manifested that Hst1 contains the gene encoding meiosis-specific histone methyltransferase PRDM9. The Prdm9 gene is responsible for partial meiotic arrest, testicular atrophy, and low sperm count in (C57BL/6J x PWD)F1 mouse hybrids. Here we report that these male hybrids suffer an additional reproductive disadvantage, decreased sperm quality, which is (i) further exacerbated by the introduction of long transgene(s) carrying sequences from Hst1 with incomplete Prdm9 into their genome, and (ii) controlled by the Prdm9 dosage. These transgenic male hybrids displayed the features of severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT), a human infertility syndrome characterized by a low number of spermatozoa with poor motility and morphological abnormalities. Analysis of spermiogenesis in these mice revealed acrosome detachment, aberrant elongation and condensation of the nucleus. As a result, the transgenic sperm had acrosome malformations, abnormal chromatin packaging, and fragmented DNA with elevated base oxidation, revealed by using multiple methods. Heterozygosity for one null Prdm9 allele improved meiotic progression and sperm quality of both non- and transgenic hybrids. Our results indicate that genomic analysis of OAT patients should include consideration of allelic variants in PRDM9, and our transgenic models can serve as tools to understand the diverse molecular processes that, when perturbed, can cause this disease.
Homologous recombination is required for proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. It occurs predominantly at recombination hotspots that are defined by the DNA binding specificity of the PRDM9 protein. PRDM9 contains three conserved domains typically involved in regulation of transcription; yet, the role of PRDM9 in gene expression control is not clear. Here, we analyze the germline transcriptome of Prdm9−/− male mice in comparison to Prdm9+/+ males and find no apparent differences in the mRNA and miRNA profiles. We further explore the role of PRDM9 in meiosis by analyzing the effect of the KRAB, SSXRD, and post-SET zinc finger deletions in a cell culture expression system and the KRAB domain deletion in mice. We found that although the post-SET zinc finger and the KRAB domains are not essential for the methyltransferase activity of PRDM9 in cell culture, the KRAB domain mutant mice show only residual PRDM9 methyltransferase activity and undergo meiotic arrest. In aggregate, our data indicate that domains typically involved in regulation of gene expression do not serve that role in PRDM9, but are likely involved in setting the proper chromatin environment for initiation and completion of homologous recombination.
Homing in on Hotspots The clustering of recombination in the genome, around locations known as hotspots, is associated with specific DNA motifs. Now, using a variety of techniques, three studies implicate a chromatin-modifying protein, the histone-methyltransferase PRDM9, as a major factor involved in human hotspots (see the Perspective by Cheung et al.). Parvanov et al. (p. 835, published online 31 December) mapped the locus in mice, and analyzed allelic variation in mice and humans, whereas Myers et al. (p. 876, published online 31 December) used a comparative analysis between human and chimpanzees to show that the recombination process leads to a self-destructive drive in which the very motifs that recruit hotspots are eliminated from our genome. Baudat et al. (p. 836, published online 31 December) took this analysis a step further to identify human allelic variants within Prdm9 that differed in the frequency at which they used hotspots. Furthermore, differential binding of this protein to different human alleles suggests that this protein interacts with specific DNA sequences. Thus, PDRM9 functions in the determination of recombination loci within the genome and may be a significant factor in the genomic differences between closely related species. A chromatin-modifying enzyme is implicated in the determination of recombination loci within the genome. Meiotic recombination events cluster into narrow segments of the genome, defined as hotspots. Here, we demonstrate that a major player for hotspot specification is the Prdm9 gene. First, two mouse strains that differ in hotspot usage are polymorphic for the zinc finger DNA binding array of PRDM9. Second, the human consensus PRDM9 allele is predicted to recognize the 13-mer motif enriched at human hotspots; this DNA binding specificity is verified by in vitro studies. Third, allelic variants of PRDM9 zinc fingers are significantly associated with variability in genome-wide hotspot usage among humans. Our results provide a molecular basis for the distribution of meiotic recombination in mammals, in which the binding of PRDM9 to specific DNA sequences targets the initiation of recombination at specific locations in the genome.
During meiosis, maternal and paternal chromosomes undergo exchanges by homologous recombination. This is essential for fertility and contributes to genome evolution. In many eukaryotes, sites of meiotic recombination, also called hotspots, are regions of accessible chromatin, but in many vertebrates, their location follows a distinct pattern and is specified by PR domain-containing protein 9 (PRDM9). The specification of meiotic recombination hotspots is achieved by the different activities of PRDM9: DNA binding, histone methyltransferase, and interaction with other proteins. Remarkably, PRDM9 activity leads to the erosion of its own binding sites and the rapid evolution of its DNA-binding domain. PRDM9 may also contribute to reproductive isolation, as it is involved in hybrid sterility potentially due to a reduction of its activity in specific heterozygous contexts.
During meiosis in most sexually reproducing organisms, recombination forms crossovers between homologous maternal and paternal chromosomes and thereby promotes proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division. The number and distribution of crossovers are tightly controlled, but the factors that contribute to this control are poorly understood in most organisms, including mammals. Here we provide evidence that the ATM kinase or protein is essential for proper crossover formation in mouse spermatocytes. ATM deficiency causes multiple phenotypes in humans and mice, including gonadal atrophy. Mouse Atm−/− spermatocytes undergo apoptosis at mid-prophase of meiosis I, but Atm−/− meiotic phenotypes are partially rescued by Spo11 heterozygosity, such that ATM-deficient spermatocytes progress to meiotic metaphase I. Strikingly, Spo11+/−Atm−/− spermatocytes are defective in forming the obligate crossover on the sex chromosomes, even though the XY pair is usually incorporated in a sex body and is transcriptionally inactivated as in normal spermatocytes. The XY crossover defect correlates with the appearance of lagging chromosomes at metaphase I, which may trigger the extensive metaphase apoptosis that is observed in these cells. In addition, control of the number and distribution of crossovers on autosomes appears to be defective in the absence of ATM because there is an increase in the total number of MLH1 foci, which mark the sites of eventual crossover formation, and because interference between MLH1 foci is perturbed. The axes of autosomes exhibit structural defects that correlate with the positions of ongoing recombination. Together, these findings indicate that ATM plays a role in both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity and further suggests that ATM is important for coordinating these features of meiotic chromosome dynamics.
Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis requires that homologous chromosomes associate and recombine. Chiasmata, the cytological manifestation of recombination, provide the physical link that holds the homologs together as a pair, facilitating their orientation on the spindle at meiosis I. Formation of most crossover (CO) events requires the assistance of a group of proteins collectively known as ZMM. HFM1/Mer3 is in this group of proteins and is required for normal progression of homologous recombination and proper synapsis between homologous chromosomes in a number of model organisms. Our work is the first study in mammals showing the in vivo function of mouse HFM1. Cytological observations suggest that initial steps of recombination are largely normal in a majority of Hfm1−/− spermatocytes. Intermediate and late stages of recombination appear aberrant, as chromosomal localization of MSH4 is altered and formation of MLH1foci is drastically reduced. In agreement, chiasma formation is reduced, and cells arrest with subsequent apoptosis at diakinesis. Our results indicate that deletion of Hfm1 leads to the elimination of a major fraction but not all COs. Formation of chromosome axial elements and homologous pairing is apparently normal, and Hfm1−/− spermatocytes progress to the end of prophase I without apparent developmental delay or apoptosis. However, synapsis is altered with components of the central region of the synaptonemal complex frequently failing to extend the full length of the chromosome axes. We propose that initial steps of recombination are sufficient to support homology recognition, pairing, and initial chromosome synapsis and that HFM1 is required to form normal numbers of COs and to complete synapsis.
During meiosis, at least one crossover must occur per homologous chromosome pair to ensure normal progression of meiotic division and accurate chromosome segregation. However, the mechanism of crossover formation is not fully understood. Here, we report a novel recombination protein, C12ORF40/REDIC1, essential for meiotic crossover formation in mammals. A homozygous frameshift mutation in C12orf40 (c.232_233insTT, p.Met78Ilefs*2) was identified in two infertile men with meiotic arrest. Spread mouse spermatocyte fluorescence immunostaining showed that REDIC1 forms discrete foci between the paired regions of homologous chromosomes depending on strand invasion and colocalizes with MSH4 and later with MLH1 at the crossover sites. Redic1 knock-in (KI) mice homozygous for mutation c.232_233insTT are infertile in both sexes due to insufficient crossovers and consequent meiotic arrest, which is also observed in our patients. The foci of MSH4 and TEX11, markers of recombination intermediates, are significantly reduced numerically in the spermatocytes of Redic1 KI mice. More importantly, our biochemical results show that the N-terminus of REDIC1 binds branched DNAs present in recombination intermediates, while the identified mutation impairs this interaction. Thus, our findings reveal a crucial role for C12ORF40/REDIC1 in meiotic crossover formation by stabilizing the recombination intermediates, providing prospective molecular targets for the clinical diagnosis and therapy of infertility.
ABSTRACT The most significant feature of meiosis is the recombination process during prophase I. CXXC finger protein 1 (CXXC1) binds to CpG islands and mediates the deposition of H3K4me3 by the SETD1 complex. CXXC1 is also predicted to recruit H3K4me3-marked regions to the chromosome axis for the generation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the prophase of meiosis. Therefore, we deleted Cxxc1 before the onset of meiosis with Stra8-Cre. The conditional knockout mice were completely sterile with spermatogenesis arrested at MII. Knockout of Cxxc1 led to a decrease in the H3K4me3 level from the pachytene to the MII stage and caused transcriptional disorder. Many spermatogenesis pathway genes were expressed early leading to abnormal acrosome formation in arrested MII cells. In meiotic prophase, deletion of Cxxc1 caused delayed DSB repair and improper crossover formation in cells at the pachytene stage, and more than half of the diplotene cells exhibited precocious homologous chromosome segregation in both male and female meiosis. Cxxc1 deletion also led to a significant decrease of H3K4me3 enrichment at DMC1-binding sites, which might compromise DSB generation. Taken together, our results show that CXXC1 is essential for proper meiotic crossover formation in mice and suggest that CXXC1-mediated H3K4me3 plays an essential role in meiotic prophase of spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Summary: Conditional knockout of Cxxc1 in mouse pre-meiotic germ cells led to a decrease in H3K4me3, dysregulation of crossover formation and meiotic arrest, revealing an essential role for CXXC1 in spermatogenesis and oogenesis.
… of meiotic recombination in mouse spermatocytes by defining … Msh2 –/– F1 hybrid mice. We recovered hundreds of meiotic … model of meiotic crossover formation that shares aspects with …
… of total MLH1 foci per spermatocyte were observed at late … increased meiotic crossovers in the spermatocytes analysed … This suggests that there is tight control of crossover formation …
Meiosis, the mechanism of creating haploid gametes, is a complex cellular process observed across sexually reproducing organisms. Fundamental to meiosis is the process of homologous recombination, whereby DNA double-strand breaks are introduced into the genome and are subsequently repaired to generate either noncrossovers or crossovers. Although homologous recombination is essential for chromosome pairing during prophase I, the resulting crossovers are critical for maintaining homolog interactions and enabling accurate segregation at the first meiotic division. Thus, the placement, timing, and frequency of crossover formation must be exquisitely controlled. In this review, we discuss the proteins involved in crossover formation, the process of their formation and designation, and the rules governing crossovers, all within the context of the important landmarks of prophase I. We draw together crossover designation data across organisms, analyze their evolutionary divergence, and propose a universal model for crossover regulation.
Crossing-over ensures accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis, and every pair of chromosomes obtains at least one crossover, even though the majority of recombination sites yield non-crossovers. A putative regulator of crossing-over is RNF212, which is associated with variation in crossover rates in humans. We show that mouse RNF212 is essential for crossing-over, functioning to couple chromosome synapsis to the formation of crossover-specific recombination complexes. Selective localization of RNF212 to a subset of recombination sites is shown to be a key early step in the crossover designation process. RNF212 acts at these sites to stabilize meiosis-specific recombination factors, including the MutSγ complex (MSH4-MSH5). We infer that selective stabilization of key recombination proteins is a fundamental feature of meiotic crossover control. Haploinsufficiency indicates that RNF212 is a limiting factor for crossover control and raises the possibility that human alleles may alter the amount or stability of RNF212 and be risk factors for aneuploid conditions.
… in mouse spermatogenesis and demonstrate that crossover events … were formed, we undertook a temporal analysis of the first synchronous wave of spermatogenesis in prepuberal mice …
Programmed double-strand breaks at prophase of meiosis acquire immunologically detectable RAD51-DMC1 foci or early nodules (ENs) that are associated with developing chromosome core segments; each focus is surrounded by a γH2AX-modified chromosome domain. The 250-300 ENs per nucleus decline in numbers during the development of full-length cores and the remaining foci are relatively evenly distributed along the mature cores (gamma distribution of ν=2.97). The ENs become transformed nodules (TNs) by the acquisition of RPA, BLM, MSH4 and topoisomerases that function in repair and Holliday junction resolution. At the leptotene-zygotene transition, TNs orient to positions between the aligned cores where they initiate structural interhomolog contacts prior to synaptonemal complex (SC) formation, possibly future crossover sites. Subsequently, TNs are associated with SC extension at the synaptic forks. Dephosphorylation of TN-associated histone γH2AX chromatin suggests annealing of single strands or repair of double-strand breaks DSBs at this time. Some 200 TNs per pachytene nucleus are distributed proportional to SC length and are evenly distributed along the SCs (ν=∼4). At this stage, γH2AX-modified chromatin domains are associated with transcriptionally silenced sex chromosomes and autosomal sites. Immunogold electron microscope evidence shows that one or two TNs of the 10-15 TNs per SC acquire MLH1 protein, the hallmark of reciprocal recombination, whereas the TNs that do not acquire MLH1 protein relocate from their positions along the midline of the SCs to the periphery of the SCs. Relocation of TNs may be associated with the conversion of potential crossovers into non-crossovers.
Fancj, the gene associated with Fanconi anemia (FA) Complementation Group J, encodes a DNA helicase involved in homologous recombination repair and the cellular response to replication stress. FANCJ functions in part through its interaction with key DNA repair proteins, including MutL homolog-1 (MLH1), Breast Cancer Associated gene-1 (BRCA1), and Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM). All three of these proteins are involved in a variety of events that ensure genome stability, including the events of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair during prophase I of meiosis. Meiotic DSBs are repaired through homologous recombination resulting in non-crossovers (NCO) or crossovers (CO). The frequency and placement of COs are stringently regulated to ensure that each chromosome receives at least one CO event, and that longer chromosomes receive at least one additional CO, thus facilitating the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes at the first meiotic division. In the present study, we investigated the role of Fancj during prophase I using a gene trap mutant allele. FancjGT/GT mutants are fertile, but their testes are very much smaller than wild-type littermates, predominantly as a result of impeded spermatogonial proliferation and mildly increased apoptosis during testis development in the fetus. This defect in spermatogonial proliferation is consistent with mutations in other FA genes. During prophase I, early events of synapsis and DSB induction/repair appear mostly normal in FancjGT/GT males, and the FANCJ-interacting protein BRCA1 assembles normally on meiotic chromosome cores. However, MLH1 focus frequency is increased in FancjGT/GT males, indicative of increased DSB repair via CO, and is concomitant with increased chiasmata at diakinesis. This increase in COs in the absence of FANCJ is associated with increased localization of BLM helicase protein, indicating that BLM may facilitate the increased rate of crossing over in FancjGT/GT males. Taken together, these results demonstrate a critical role for FANCJ in spermatogenesis at two stages: firstly in the proliferative activity that gives rise to the full complement of testicular spermatogonia and secondly in the establishment of appropriate CO numbers during prophase I.
Abstract Crossovers (COs) generate genetic diversity and proper homologous chromosome segregation during meiosis. Mus musculus domesticus, with a diploid number of 2n=40, has 19 autosomal pairs plus one sex chromosome pair all of which are telocentric chromosomes. Frequently exhibits Robertsonian fusions (Rb), which create natural populations with reduced chromosome numbers according to the Rb chromosomes. We examined the number and distribution of COs in spermatocytes from standard homozygous 2n=40 individuals, compared to homozygous Rb 2n=24 and heterozygous Rb 2n=32 individuals carrying 8 trivalents. Spermatocyte nuclear spreads from homozygous and heterozygous were prepared, and immunocytochemistry was used to detect the MLH1 protein for crossover (CO) and the SYCP3 protein for synaptonemal complexes in bivalents or trivalents. We observed an average of 26 ± 2.1 COs in 2n=40, 20.1 ± 1.6 COs in 2n=24, and an intermediate value of 22.4 ± 2.0 COs in 2n=32 spermatocytes. The lower frequency of COs in 2n=24 and 2n=32 spermatocytes compared to 2n=40 may be due to interference from the pericentromeric heterochromatin present in the Rb bivalent or trivalent chromosomes. Additionally, we suggest that the spatial positioning and interactions of these derivative chromosomes in the nucleus could help explain the differences in COs between 2n=24, 2n=32, and 2n=40 spermatocytes.
… monitor the number of crossovers inherited by offspring. … formation and disappearance in yeast meiosis. However, because the rate of spermatogenesis can vary between strains of mice …
… recent studies in humans and mice. We first outline the evidence for DSB formation and repair and … While mutant spermatocytes undergo apoptosis at the end of zygotene/beginning of …
Summary Meiotic crossovers are required for accurate chromosome segregation and producing new allelic combinations. Meiotic crossover numbers are tightly regulated within a narrow range, despite an excess of initiating DNA double-strand breaks. Here, we reveal the tumor suppressor FANCM as a meiotic anti-crossover factor in mammals. We use unique large-scale crossover analyses with both single-gamete sequencing and pedigree-based bulk-sequencing datasets to identify a genome-wide increase in crossover frequencies in Fancm-deficient mice. Gametogenesis is heavily perturbed in Fancm loss-of-function mice, which is consistent with the reproductive defects reported in humans with biallelic FANCM mutations. A portion of the gametogenesis defects can be attributed to the cGAS-STING pathway after birth. Despite the gametogenesis phenotypes in Fancm mutants, both sexes are capable of producing offspring. We propose that the anti-crossover function and role in gametogenesis of Fancm are separable and will inform diagnostic pathways for human genomic instability disorders.
Bisphenol A (BPA) and other endocrine disrupting chemicals have been reported to induce negative effects on a wide range of physiological processes, including reproduction. In the female, BPA exposure increases meiotic errors, resulting in the production of chromosomally abnormal eggs. Although numerous studies have reported that estrogenic exposures negatively impact spermatogenesis, a direct link between exposures and meiotic errors in males has not been evaluated. To test the effect of estrogenic chemicals on meiotic chromosome dynamics, we exposed male mice to either BPA or to the strong synthetic estrogen, ethinyl estradiol during neonatal development when the first cells initiate meiosis. Although chromosome pairing and synapsis were unperturbed, exposed outbred CD-1 and inbred C3H/HeJ males had significantly reduced levels of crossovers, or meiotic recombination (as defined by the number of MLH1 foci in pachytene cells) by comparison with placebo. Unexpectedly, the effect was not limited to cells exposed at the time of meiotic entry but was evident in all subsequent waves of meiosis. To determine if the meiotic effects induced by estrogen result from changes to the soma or germline of the testis, we transplanted spermatogonial stem cells from exposed males into the testes of unexposed males. Reduced recombination was evident in meiocytes derived from colonies of transplanted cells. Taken together, our results suggest that brief exogenous estrogenic exposure causes subtle changes to the stem cell pool that result in permanent alterations in spermatogenesis (i.e., reduced recombination in descendent meiocytes) in the adult male.
… of the heteroduplex intertwines in a DHJ, with the help of one or … DNA topoisomerase in the resolution of DHJ in meiotic cells … DNA topoisomerase in the resolution of DHJ is not limited to …
During meiosis, induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) leads to recombination between homologous chromosomes, resulting in crossovers (CO) and non-crossovers (NCO). In the mouse, only 10% of DSBs resolve as COs, mostly through a class I pathway dependent on MutSγ (MSH4/ MSH5) and MutLγ (MLH1/MLH3), the latter representing the ultimate marker of these CO events. A second Class II CO pathway accounts for only a few COs, but is not thought to involve MutSγ/ MutLγ, and is instead dependent on MUS81-EME1. For class I events, loading of MutLγ is thought to be dependent on MutSγ, however MutSγ loads very early in prophase I at a frequency that far exceeds the final number of class I COs. Moreover, loss of MutSγ in mouse results in apoptosis before CO formation, preventing the analysis of its CO function. We generated a mutation in the ATP binding domain of Msh5 (Msh5GA). While this mutation was not expected to affect MutSγ complex formation, MutSγ foci do not accumulate during prophase I. However, most spermatocytes from Msh5GA/GA mice progress to late pachynema and beyond, considerably further than meiosis in Msh5−/− animals. At pachynema, Msh5GA/GA spermatocytes show persistent DSBs, incomplete homolog pairing, and fail to accumulate MutLγ. Unexpectedly, Msh5GA/GA diakinesis-staged spermatocytes have no chiasmata at all from any CO pathway, indicating that a functional MutSγ complex is critical for all CO events regardless of their mechanism of generation.
… Elongation of CCs in Exo1 −/− spermatocytes was independent of MUS81, suggesting that CCs result from dissolution or SDSA-like mechanisms, rather than from dHJ resolution, …
Meiotic recombination between homologous chromosomes is initiated by the formation of hundreds of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Approximately 10% of these DSBs result in crossovers (COs), sites of physical DNA exchange between homologs that are critical to correct chromosome segregation. Virtually all COs are formed by coordinated efforts of the MSH4/MSH5 and MLH1/MLH3 heterodimers, the latter representing the defining marks of CO sites. The regulation of CO number and position is poorly understood, but undoubtedly requires the coordinated action of multiple repair pathways. In a previous report, we found gene-trap disruption of the DNA helicase, FANCJ (BRIP1/BACH1), elicited elevated numbers of MLH1 foci and chiasmata. In somatic cells, FANCJ interacts with numerous DNA repair proteins including MLH1, and we hypothesized that FANCJ functions with MLH1 to regulate the major CO pathway. To further elucidate the meiotic function of FANCJ, we produced three new Fancj mutant mouse lines via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a full-gene deletion, truncation of the N-terminal Helicase domain, and a C-terminal dual-tagged allele. We also generated an antibody against the C-terminus of the mouse FANCJ protein. Surprisingly, none of our Fancj mutants show any change in either MLH1 focus counts during pachynema or total CO number at diakinesis of prophase I. We find evidence that FANCJ and MLH1 do not interact in meiosis; further, FANCJ does not co-localize with MSH4, MLH1, or MLH3 in meiosis. Instead, FANCJ co-localizes with BRCA1 and TOPBP1, forming discrete foci along the chromosome cores beginning in early meiotic prophase I and densely localized to unsynapsed chromosome axes in late zygonema and to the XY chromosomes in early pachynema. Fancj mutants also exhibit a subtle persistence of DSBs in pachynema. Collectively, these data indicate a role for FANCJ in early DSB repair, but they rule out a role for FANCJ in MLH1-mediated CO events.
Programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) catalyzed by the conserved topoisomerase-like complex SPO11-TOP6BL, together with its accessory proteins, initiate meiotic recombination, a process central to meiosis. In mammals, DSBs are distributed nonrandomly at preferential genomic sites (called hotspots) defined largely by the meiosis-specific protein PRDM9. Precise temporal and spatial control of DSB formation is essential for generating genetic diversity while maintaining genomic stability during meiosis. Disruption of this process leads to aberrant recombination, chromosome mis-segregation, and reproductive defects. In this review, we summarize recent genetic, biochemical, and structural advances clarifying the molecular architecture and regulation of meiotic DSB formation in mammals.
… dHJ resolution leads to either conversion or CO events (Citation7, Citation15). This would, in turn, provide a driving mechanism for the extreme tandem repeat shuffling observed at …
During meiosis, crossover recombination connects homologous chromosomes to direct their accurate segregation1. Defective crossing over causes infertility, miscarriage and congenital disease. Each pair of chromosomes attains at least one crossover via the formation and biased resolution of recombination intermediates known as double Holliday junctions2,3. A central principle of crossover resolution is that the two Holliday junctions are resolved in opposite planes by targeting nuclease incisions to specific DNA strands4. The endonuclease activity of the MutLγ complex has been implicated in the resolution of crossovers5–10, but the mechanisms that activate and direct strand-specific cleavage remain unknown. Here we show that the sliding clamp PCNA is important for crossover-biased resolution. In vitro assays with human enzymes show that PCNA and its loader RFC are sufficient to activate the MutLγ endonuclease. MutLγ is further stimulated by a co-dependent activity of the pro-crossover factors EXO1 and MutSγ, the latter of which binds Holliday junctions11. MutLγ also binds various branched DNAs, including Holliday junctions, but does not show canonical resolvase activity, implying that the endonuclease incises adjacent to junction branch points to achieve resolution. In vivo, RFC facilitates MutLγ-dependent crossing over in budding yeast. Furthermore, PCNA localizes to prospective crossover sites along synapsed chromosomes. These data highlight similarities between crossover resolution and the initiation steps of DNA mismatch repair12,13 and evoke a novel model for crossover-specific resolution of double Holliday junctions during meiosis. A new mechanism explaining how double Holliday junctions are specifically resolved into crossovers during meiosis is shown that resembles the initiation of DNA mismatch repair.
… , dHJ would have to be resolved as non-CO products for this hypothesis to be correct. It is possible that an activity responsible for the dissolution of dHJ [37] replaces the resolution …
… To resolve this problem, we validated and developed further … isolate the meiotic fractions from adult mice to more than 95% … part, the formation and resolution of recombinant molecules. …
… -1 was analyzed in mouse germ cells by immunogold electron … In mouse, msj-1 maps on chromosome 1, into an intronic … Similarly to mouse, in human both regions map into an intronic …
Histone modification has been implicated in the regulation of mammalian spermatogenesis. However, the association of differently modified histone H3 with a specific stage of germ cells during spermatogenesis is not fully understood. In this study, we examined the localization of variously modified histone H3 in paraffin-embedded sections of adult mouse testis immunohistochemically, focusing on acetylation at lysine 9 (H3K9ac), lysine 18 (H3K18ac), and lysine 23 (H3K23ac); tri-methylation at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) and lysine 27 (H3K27me3); and phosphorylation at serine 10 (H3S10phos). As a result, we found that there was a significant fluctuation in the modifications; in spermatogonia, the stainings for H3K9ac, H3K18ac, and H3K23ac were strong while that for H3K4me3 was weak. In spermatocytes, the stainings for H3K9ac, H3K18ac, H3K23ac, and H3K4me3 were reduced in the preleptotene to pachytene stage, but in diplotene stage the stainings for H3K18ac, H3K23ac, and H3K4me3 seemed to become intense again. The staining for H3K27me3 was nearly constant throughout these stages. In the ensuing spermiogenesis, a dramatic acetylation and methylation of histone H3 was found in the early elongated spermatids and then almost all signals disappeared in the late elongated spermatids, in parallel with the replacement from histones to protamines. In addition, we confirmed that the staining of histone H3S10phos was exclusively associated with mitotic and meiotic cell division. Based upon the above results, we indicated that the modification pattern of histone H3 is subject to dynamic change and specific to a certain stage of germ cell differentiation during mouse spermatogenesis.
Epigenetic programming governs cell fate determination during development through intricately controlling sequential gene activation and repression. Although H3K4me3 is widely recognized as a hallmark of gene activation, its role in modulating transcription output and timing within a continuously developing system remains poorly understood. In this study, we provide a detailed characterization of the epigenomic landscapes in developing male germ cells. We identified thousands of spermatid-specific broad H3K4me3 domains regulated by the SETD1B-RFX2 axis, representing a previously underappreciated form of H3K4me3. These domains, overlapping with H3K27ac-marked enhancers and promoters, play critical roles in orchestrating robust transcription and accurate temporal control of gene expression. Mechanistically, these broad H3K4me3 compete effectively with regular H3K4me3 for transcriptional machinery, thereby ensuring robust levels and precise timing of master gene expression in mouse spermiogenesis. Disruption of this mechanism compromises the accuracy of transcription dosage and timing, ultimately impairing spermiogenesis. Additionally, we unveil remarkable changes in the distribution of heterochromatin marks, including H3K27me3 and H3K9me2, during the mitosis-to-meiosis transition and completion of meiotic recombination, which closely correlates with gene silencing. This work underscores the highly orchestrated epigenetic regulation in spermatogenesis, highlighting the previously unrecognized role of Setd1b in the formation of broad H3K4me3 domains and transcriptional control, and provides an invaluable resource for future studies toward the elucidation of spermatogenesis.
Abstract Advancing the molecular knowledge surrounding fertility and inheritance has become critical given the halving of sperm counts in the last 40 years, and the rise in complex disease which cannot be explained by genetics alone. The connection between both these trends may lie in alterations to the sperm epigenome and occur through environmental exposures. Changes to the sperm epigenome are also associated with health risks across generations such as metabolic disorders and cancer. Thus, it is imperative to identify the epigenetic modifications that escape reprogramming during spermatogenesis and embryogenesis. Here, we aimed to identify the chromatin signature(s) involved in transgenerational phenotypes in our genetic mouse model of epigenetic inheritance that overexpresses the histone demethylase KDM1A in their germ cells. We used sperm-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by in depth sequencing (ChIP-seq), and computational analysis to identify whether differential enrichment of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3), and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) serve as mechanisms for transgenerational epigenetic inheritance through the paternal germline. Our analysis on the sperm of KDM1A transgenic males revealed specific changes in H3K4me3 enrichment that predominantly occurred independently from bivalent H3K4me3/H3K27me3 regions. Many regions with altered H3K4me3 enrichment in sperm were identified on the paternal allele of the pre-implantation embryo. These findings suggest that sperm H3K4me3 functions in the transmission of non-genetic phenotypes transgenerationally.
Human epidemiological studies have shown that paternal aging as one of the risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism, in offspring. A recent study has suggested that factors other than de novo mutations due to aging can influence the biology of offspring. Here, we focused on epigenetic alterations in sperm that can influence developmental programs in offspring. In this study, we qualitatively and semiquantitatively evaluated histone modification patterns in male germline cells throughout spermatogenesis based on immunostaining of testes taken from young (3 months old) and aged (12 months old) mice. Although localization patterns were not obviously changed between young and aged testes, some histone modification showed differences in their intensity. Among histone modifications that repress gene expression, histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) was decreased in the male germline cells of the aged testis, while H3K27me2/3 was increased. The intensity of H3K27 acetylation (ac), an active mark, was lower/higher depending on the stages in the aged testis. Interestingly, H3K27ac was detected on the putative sex chromosomes of round spermatids, while other chromosomes were occupied by a repressive mark, H3K27me3. Among other histone modifications that activate gene expression, H3K4me2 was drastically decreased in the male germline cells of the aged testis. In contrast, H3K79me3 was increased in M-phase spermatocytes, where it accumulates on the sex chromosomes. Therefore, aging induced alterations in the amount of histone modifications and in the differences of patterns for each modification. Moreover, histone modifications on the sex chromosomes and on other chromosomes seems to be differentially regulated by aging. These findings will help elucidate the epigenetic mechanisms underlying the influence of paternal aging on offspring development.
During meiosis, the X and Y chromosomes are transcriptionally silenced. The persistence of repressive chromatin marks on the sex chromatin after meiosis initially led to the assumption that XY gene silencing persists to some extent in spermatids. Considering the many reports of XY-linked genes expressed and needed in the post-meiotic phase of mouse spermatogenesis, it is still unclear whether or not the mouse sex chromatin is a repressive or permissive environment, after meiosis. To determine the transcriptional and chromatin state of the sex chromosomes after meiosis, we re-analyzed ten ChIP-Seq datasets performed on mouse round spermatids and four RNA-seq datasets from male germ cells purified at different stages of spermatogenesis. For this, we used the last version of the genome (mm10/GRCm38) and included reads that map to several genomic locations in order to properly interpret the high proportion of sex chromosome-encoded multicopy genes. Our study shows that coverage of active epigenetic marks H3K4me3 and Kcr is similar on the sex chromosomes and on autosomes. The post-meiotic sex chromatin nevertheless differs from autosomal chromatin in its enrichment in H3K9me3 and its depletion in H3K27me3 and H4 acetylation. We also identified a posttranslational modification, H3K27ac, which specifically accumulates on the Y chromosome. In parallel, we found that the X and Y chromosomes are enriched in genes expressed post-meiotically and display a higher proportion of spermatid-specific genes compared to autosomes. Finally, we observed that portions of chromosome 14 and of the sex chromosomes share specific features, such as enrichment in H3K9me3 and the presence of multicopy genes that are specifically expressed in round spermatids, suggesting that parts of chromosome 14 are under the same evolutionary constraints than the sex chromosomes. Based on our expression and epigenomic studies, we conclude that, after meiosis, the mouse sex chromosomes are no longer silenced but are nevertheless regulated differently than autosomes and accumulate different chromatin marks. We propose that post-meiotic selective constraints are at the basis of the enrichment of spermatid-specific genes and of the peculiar chromatin composition of the sex chromosomes and of parts of chromosome 14.
… The temporal and spatial distributions of H3K4me1/2/3 and … Therefore, H3K4me3 might be mainly regulated by PLU-1 … spermatogonia, leptotene spermatocytes and spermatids. During …
… Using a mouse knockout model, loss of demethylation by KDM4D does not affect the completion of spermatogenesis or fertility, despite dramatic changes in the distribution of mono-, di-, …
The core histone is composed of four proteins (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4). Investigation of the modification patterns of histones is critical to understanding their roles in biological processes. Although histone modification is observed in multiple cells and tissues, little is known about its function in spermatogenesis. We focused on the modification patterns of histone H4 during murine spermatogenesis. We demonstrated that the individual N-terminal sites of H4 show different modification patterns during the differentiation of male germ cells. The methylation pattern varied depending on the residues that were mono-, di-, or tri-methylated. All the H4 modifications were high during the meiotic prophase, suggesting that histone H4 modification plays an important role during this stage of spermatogenesis. Elongating spermatids showed increased acetylation of histone H4, which may be associated with a histone-to-protamine substitution. Our results provide further insight into the specific relationship between histone H4 modification and gene expression during spermatogenesis, which could help to elucidate the epigenetic disorders underlying male infertility.
Abstract Environmental exposures can alter the long-term health and development of offspring. How this environmental information is transmitted via the germline remains unknown, but it is thought to involve epigenetic inheritance. We recently determined that genetic disruption of histone H3 dimethylation at lysine 4 (H3K4me2) in sperm alters gene expression in the embryo and negatively impacts development across generations. However, little is known regarding when in spermatogenesis H3K4me2 methylation is established, and whether specific regions bearing H3K4me2 resist the epigenome remodeling that occurs throughout spermatogenesis. Our objective was to determine what genomic regions bearing histone H3K4me2 in spermatogonia are also present in sperm. Methods: Using transgenic mice expressing Oct4-GFP, we isolated an enriched spermatogonia population and performed ChIP-seq for H3K4me2, followed by downstream bioinformatics analysis. Using our epigenomic data and existing datasets, we compared the genomic distribution of H3K4me2 between spermatogonia and sperm. We also assessed the expression level of genes enriched in H3K4me2 in spermatogenic cell types and at specific embryonic developmental time-points. We observed that many regions of the sperm epigenome bearing H3K4me2 are already present in spermatogonia, suggesting an early establishment of this histone mark in spermatogenesis. Subsets of genes with a high enrichment in H3K4me2 in sperm are strongly expressed in spermatogenesis and others are associated with high gene expression during embryo development. These findings suggest that if epimutations in H3K4me2 are induced in spermatogonia they have the possibility to persist throughout spermatogenesis and may influence fertility by altering gene expression in spermatogenesis and in the embryo. Summary Sentence Histone methylation (H3K4me2) is highly conserved from spermatogonia to sperm and is associated with gene expression in spermatogenesis and embryo development.
DNA methylation and histone modifications critically regulate the expression of many genes and repeat regions during spermatogenesis. However, the molecular details of these processes in male germ cells remain to be addressed. Here, using isolated murine sperm cells, ultra-low–input native ChIP-Seq (ULI-NChIP-Seq), and whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), we investigated genome-wide DNA methylation patterns and histone 3 Lys-9 trimethylation (H3K9me3) modifications during mouse spermatogenesis. We found that DNA methylation and H3K9me3 have distinct sequence preferences and dynamics in promoters and repeat elements during spermatogenesis. H3K9me3 modifications in histones at gene promoters were highly enriched in round spermatids. H3K9me3 modification on long terminal repeats (LTRs) and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) was involved in silencing active transcription from these regions in conjunction with reestablishment of DNA methylation. Furthermore, H3K9me3 remodeling on the X chromosome was involved in meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and in partial transcriptional reactivation of sex chromosomes in spermatids. Our findings also revealed the DNA methylation patterns and H3K9me3 modification profiles of paternal and maternal germline imprinting control regions (gICRs) during spermatogenesis. Taken together, our results provide a genome-wide map of H3K9me3 modifications during mouse spermatogenesis that may be helpful for understanding male reproductive disorders.
本报告通过对雄性小鼠减数分裂高分研究进行逻辑整合,将研究体系划分为六大核心领域:从减数分裂起始的基因程序控制,到PRDM9驱动的热点特异性识别,涵盖了重组与DNA损伤修复的复杂机制,并系统性总结了染色质重塑与表观遗传的动态调节过程。此外,报告还涵盖了减数分裂细胞周期监控、遗传异质性及演化机制,为理解雄性生殖细胞如何确保遗传稳定性与多样性提供了综合的研究架构。