数字遗产继承、微信账号继承纠纷、虚拟财产平台格式条款
数字遗产继承的理论与实践挑战
该组文献集中探讨数字遗产定义、继承中的资产识别、评估及法律与伦理困境,侧重于遗产规划的宏观视角。
- Ontology of Digital Asset After Death: Policy Complexities, Suggestions, and Critique of Digital Platforms(Yong Jin Park, Yoonmo Sang, Hoon Lee, Seongbin Jang, 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal)
- Information science and the inevitable: A literature review at the intersection of death and information management: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper(J. Dinneen, Maja Krtalić, Nilou Davoudi, Helene Hellmich, Catharina Ochsner, Paulina Bressel, 2023, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology)
- Digital Assets In Decedents’ Estates: Overview And Analysis(E. Morse, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal)
社交账号权属与继承纠纷研究
该组文献专门研究社交媒体账号作为数字遗产的特殊性,分析其权属认定及在继承过程中面临的隐私权保护与司法实践难题。
- Inheritance of the social media accounts in Poland(M Grochowski, 2019, Eur. Rev. Private L.)
- 数字遗产继承困境下社交账号的权属研究(志玲 王, 2025, SE)
平台格式条款与虚拟财产权利限制
该组文献关注平台通过格式条款(Boilerplate)对数字资产和虚拟财产设置的权利限制,以及用户对这些法律条款的认知与合规行为。
- Boilerplate No Contest Clauses(D Horton, RK Weisbord, 2019, Law and Contemporary Problems)
- User Perspectives on Terms and Conditions in Virtual Worlds(M. Blakely, 2026, SSRN Electronic Journal)
- Location, Location, Location! Virtual Real Estate Disputes in the Metaverse and Blockchain Dispute Resolution(AML Rodríguez, 2024, Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute …)
- The Platform-Property Paradox(N Guggenberger, 2026, Available at SSRN)
本报告通过梳理数字遗产相关文献,将研究划分为遗产继承的宏观框架、社交账号的特殊权属争议以及数字平台格式条款对权利行使的规制三个核心维度,旨在为处理数字时代的遗产继承纠纷提供理论依据与规范路径。
总计9篇相关文献
互联网技术的快速发展,数字遗产的继承问题日益凸显,社交账号的权属认定成为法律实践中的难点。文章基于社交账号的法律属性,分析社交账号的权属在数字遗产继承中的特殊性,文章还分析当前法律规定、司法适用、用户协议、技术保护、社会认知层面存在的问题,结合具体司法案例,从立法完善、协议规范、技术创新、观念引导4个维度提出解决路径,目的是给数字时代社交账号的权属认定提供理论参考和实践指引。
… Secondly, as will be discussed in point 5, in particular instances the general inheritability of digital assets could infringe other rights, especially privacy and personal rights of the …
… can we identify and inventory those assets? Who has physical … Once digital assets are identified, how can these assets be … these assets be valued (as required for estate or inheritance …
Death is an inevitable part of life and highly relevant to information management: its approach often requires preparation, and its occurrence often demands a response. Many works in information science have acknowledged so much, and yet death is rarely a focused topic, appearing instead sporadically and disconnected across research. As a result there is no introduction to, overview of, or synthesis across studies on death and information. We therefore conducted an extensive literature search and reviewed nearly 300 scholarly publications at the intersection of death and information (and data) management. Covering seven topics in total, we review two groups of work directly engaging information management in relation to death (digital possessions, inheritance, and legacy; information behavior, needs, and practices around death), three engaging death and technology that require information and its management (death and the Internet, thanatosensitive design and technology‐augmented death practices, and the digital afterlife and digital immortality), and two reflecting the ethical and legal dimensions unique to death and information. We then integrate the collective findings to summarize the landscape of death‐related information research, outline remaining challenges for individuals, families, institutions, and society, and identify promising directions for future information science research.
… We argue that the issue at stake is more complex than estate planning or asset inheritance. First, it can concern more than tangible financial values because digital assets carry not only …
… Third, boilerplate and property … boilerplate, like property, breaks complex arrangements into manageable and independent chunks.Boilerplate’s individual definitions, terms, and clauses …
This Article explores terms and conditions (T&Cs) for virtual worlds through the lens of user perspectives. The original, qualitative empirical research via 22 semi-structured interviews and 124 survey responses explores topics including digital terms and conditions, copyright and creativity, loot boxes, and online cultures. This first Article based on this data examines users’ understanding, motivation, and compliance with T&Cs in a persistent online community. Although it is well established that users largely do not read online T&Cs prior to acceptance, complex online social spaces, such as Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOs), necessitate equally complex legal and technological dynamics. These virtual worlds can be difficult to infiltrate and analyse without active participation and a deeper understanding of the social mores and technical tools of the specific space. Therefore, obtaining valuable data from users in this context is a rare resource for law and industry. This Article and the following series provide some insight into user understanding of the law in these areas.
… clause by asserting community property rights when the trust “characterized each piece of property as community property [or] separate property” … a suspected boilerplate clause with the …
… of property, introducing virtual real estate as a significant economic asset. This article explores the challenges posed by disputes over virtual immovable property … an arbitration clause in …
本报告通过梳理数字遗产相关文献,将研究划分为遗产继承的宏观框架、社交账号的特殊权属争议以及数字平台格式条款对权利行使的规制三个核心维度,旨在为处理数字时代的遗产继承纠纷提供理论依据与规范路径。