RNF168
RNF168 的生化特性与核小体识别的结构基础
这类文献聚焦于 RNF168 的分子结构(RING, UDM, MIU 结构域)及其对核小体底物的特异性识别机制,特别是如何通过‘酸性补丁(Acidic Patch)’定位并催化组蛋白 H2A/H2AX/H1 的 K13/15 位点泛素化。
- Ubiquitin-induced RNF168 condensation promotes DNA double-strand break repair(Li-Li Feng, S. Bie, Zhiheng Deng, S. Bai, Jie Shi, C. Qin, Huan-Lei Liu, Jia-Xu Li, Wan-Ying Chen, Jin-Ying Zhou, Chun-Mei Jiao, Yi Ma, Meng-Bo Qiu, Huasong Ai, Jian Zheng, Mien-Chie Hung, Yunlong Wang, Xiang-Bo Wan, Xin-Juan Fan, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
- RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling.(Francesca Mattiroli, J. Vissers, W. Dijk, Pauline T. Ikpa, E. Citterio, W. Vermeulen, J. Marteijn, T. Sixma, 2012, Cell)
- Topology of ubiquitin chains in the e3 ubiquitin ligase rnf168 chromatosome entourage(A. Kudriaeva, L. A. Yakubova, G. A. Saratov, V. I. Vladimirov, V. M. Lipkin, A. Belogurov, 2023, Биохимия)
- RNF168 promotes noncanonical K27 ubiquitination to signal DNA damage.(Marco Gatti, Sabrina Pinato, A. Maiolica, F. Rocchio, M. G. Prato, R. Aebersold, L. Penengo, 2015, Cell reports)
- RING Domain Mutation Hinders the E3 Ligase Activity of RNF8 and Affects UBE2N Binding(Mehar Sahu, Pravir Kumar, 2023, 2023 International Conference on Network, Multimedia and Information Technology (NMITCON))
- Topological Features of Histone H2A Monoubiquitination(A. Kudriaeva, V. Lipkin, A. Belogurov, 2020, Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics)
- A small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci(Corey M. Helchowski, L. Skow, Katelyn H Roberts, Colleen Chute, C. Canman, 2013, Cell Cycle)
- UMI, a Novel RNF168 Ubiquitin Binding Domain Involved in the DNA Damage Signaling Pathway(Sabrina Pinato, Marco Gatti, C. Scandiuzzi, S. Confalonieri, L. Penengo, 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology)
- The structural basis of modified nucleosome recognition by 53BP1(M. D. Wilson, S. Benlekbir, Amélie Fradet-Turcotte, Alana Sherker, J. Julien, Andrea McEwan, S. M. Noordermeer, F. Sicheri, J. Rubinstein, D. Durocher, 2016, Nature)
- Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks.(Stephanie Panier, Yosuke Ichijima, Amélie Fradet-Turcotte, C. Leung, L. Kaustov, C. Arrowsmith, D. Durocher, 2012, Molecular cell)
- Ubiquitin-activating enzyme UBA1 is required for cellular response to DNA damage(Pavel Moudrý, C. Lukas, L. Macurek, Hana Hanzlíková, Z. Hodny, J. Lukas, J. Bartek, 2012, Cell Cycle)
- Structural basis of specific H2A K13/K15 ubiquitination by RNF168(V. Horn, Michael Uckelmann, Heyi Zhang, Jelmer Eerland, Ivette Aarsman, Ulric B. le Paige, C. Davidovich, T. Sixma, H. van Ingen, 2019, Nature Communications)
- Histone H2A variants alpha1-extension helix directs RNF168-mediated ubiquitination(J. Kelliher, Kirk L. West, Q. Gong, Justin W. C. Leung, 2020, Nature Communications)
- Promotion of RNF168-Mediated Nucleosomal H2A Ubiquitylation by Structurally-defined K63-Polyubiquitylated Linker Histone H1(Qiang Shi, Zhiheng Deng, Liying Zhang, Zebin Tong, Jiabin Li, Guo-Chao Chu, Huasong Ai, Lei Liu, 2024, bioRxiv)
- An RNF168 fragment defective for focal accumulation at DNA damage is proficient for inhibition of homologous recombination in BRCA1 deficient cells(Meilen C Muñoz, Diana A. Yanez, Jeremy M. Stark, 2014, Nucleic Acids Research)
- RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins.(C. Doil, Niels Mailand, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Patrice Ménard, D. Larsen, R. Pepperkok, J. Ellenberg, Stephanie Panier, D. Durocher, J. Bartek, J. Lukas, C. Lukas, 2009, Cell)
- Mechanisms of Ubiquitin-Nucleosome Recognition and Regulation of 53BP1 Chromatin Recruitment by RNF168/169 and RAD18.(Q. Hu, M. Botuyan, G. Cui, Debiao Zhao, G. Mer, 2017, Molecular cell)
- Mechanisms of RNF168 nucleosome recognition and ubiquitylation.(Qi Hu, Debiao Jim Zhao, G. Cui, Janarjan Bhandari, J. R. Thompson, M. Botuyan, G. Mer, 2024, Molecular cell)
- The nucleosome acidic patch plays a critical role in RNF168-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2A(Francesca Mattiroli, M. Uckelmann, D. Sahtoe, W. V. van Dijk, T. Sixma, 2014, Nature Communications)
- Mechanism of nucleosomal H2A K13/15 monoubiquitination and adjacent dual monoubiquitination by RNF168(Huasong Ai, Zebin Tong, Zhiheng Deng, Qiang Shi, Shixian Tao, Gaoge Sun, Jiawei Liang, Maoshen Sun, Xiangwei Wu, Qingyun Zheng, Lujun Liang, Hang Yin, Jiabin Li, Shuai Gao, Changlin Tian, Lei Liu, Man Pan, 2024, Nature Chemical Biology)
- Histone H1 couples initiation and amplification of ubiquitin signalling after DNA damage(T. Thorslund, Anita Ripplinger, Saskia Hoffmann, T. Wild, M. Uckelmann, Bine H Villumsen, Takeo Narita, T. Sixma, Chunaram Choudhary, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Niels Mailand, 2015, Nature)
- RNF168, a new RING finger, MIU-containing protein that modifies chromatin by ubiquitination of histones H2A and H2AX(Sabrina Pinato, C. Scandiuzzi, N. Arnaudo, E. Citterio, G. Gaudino, L. Penengo, 2009, BMC Molecular Biology)
RNF8-RNF168 信号级联与下游修复因子的募集
探讨 RNF168 如何响应上游 RNF8 信号,在损伤位点建立泛素化信号网络,并协同其他因子(如 MDC1, L3MBTL2)募集 53BP1、BRCA1-BARD1 复合物及 p97 辅助因子。
- Calling RNF168 to action(S. Nowsheen, Zhenkun Lou, 2018, Cell Stress)
- RNF8‐ubiquitinated KMT5A is required for RNF168‐induced H2A ubiquitination in response to DNA damage(Xiaopeng Lu, Min Xu, Qian Zhu, Jun Zhang, Ge Liu, Yantao Bao, L. Gu, Yuan Tian, He Wen, Wei-Guo Zhu, 2021, The FASEB Journal)
- SET8 localization to chromatin flanking DNA damage is dependent on RNF168 ubiquitin ligase(Stanimir Dulev, Sichun Lin, Qingquan Liu, V. Cetintas, N. Batada, 2019, bioRxiv)
- DNA damage-induced histone H1 ubiquitylation is mediated by HUWE1 and stimulates the RNF8-RNF168 pathway(I. Mandemaker, L. van Cuijk, R. Janssens, H. Lans, K. Bezstarosti, J. Hoeijmakers, J. Demmers, W. Vermeulen, J. Marteijn, 2017, Scientific Reports)
- ZNF451 collaborates with RNF8 to regulate RNF168 localization and amplify ubiquitination signaling to promote DNA damage repair and regulate radiosensitivity(Feng Xu, Q. Xia, Bin Chen, Ruru Wang, Jie Zhang, Xipeng Zhao, Zhaoyang Zhang, Zhicheng Yao, Shenglan Zhou, Xiaona Li, Biaowei Chen, An Xu, Lijun Wu, Guoping Zhao, 2025, Cell Death & Differentiation)
- Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response.(Haico van Attikum, S. Gasser, 2009, Trends in cell biology)
- RNF8 and RNF168 but not HERC2 are required for DNA damage-induced ubiquitylation in chicken DT40 cells.(V. Oestergaard, Constanze Pentzold, Rune Troelsgaard Pedersen, Silviu Iosif, A. Alpi, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Niels Mailand, M. Lisby, 2012, DNA repair)
- 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA damage-induced H2A Lys15 ubiquitin mark(Amélie Fradet-Turcotte, M. Canny, Cristina Escribano-Díaz, Alexandre Orthwein, C. Leung, Hao Huang, Marie-Claude Landry, Julianne Kitevski-LeBlanc, S. M. Noordermeer, F. Sicheri, D. Durocher, 2013, Nature)
- The RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade facilitates class switch recombination(Shaliny Ramachandran, Richard Chahwan, R. Nepal, D. Frieder, Stephanie Panier, S. Roa, A. Zaheen, D. Durocher, M. Scharff, Alberto Martin, 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Ubiquitin-H2AX fusions render 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites independent of RNF8 or RNF168(Maciej K. Kocylowski, Alix J. Rey, G. Stewart, T. Halazonetis, 2015, Cell Cycle)
- The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks(K. Ács, M. S. Luijsterburg, Leena Ackermann, F. Salomons, T. Hoppe, N. Dantuma, 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology)
- p97/VCP- and Lys48-linked polyubiquitination form a new signaling pathway in DNA damage response(Kristijan Ramadan, 2012, Cell Cycle)
- Stoichiometry of ubiquitin-binding proteins directs DSB repair(C. Bakkenist, C. Vaziri, 2013, Cell Cycle)
- BARD1 reads H2A lysine 15 ubiquitination to direct homologous recombination(Jordan R. Becker, Gillian Clifford, Clara Bonnet, Anja Groth, M. D. Wilson, J. R. Chapman, 2021, Nature)
- The ubiquitin‐ and SUMO‐dependent signaling response to DNA double‐strand breaks(Simon Bekker-Jensen, Niels Mailand, 2011, FEBS Letters)
- RNF8 E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Stimulates Ubc13 E2 Conjugating Activity That Is Essential for DNA Double Strand Break Signaling and BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Recruitment*(C. D. Hodge, I. Ismail, I. Ismail, R. Edwards, Greg L. Hura, Andrew Xiao, J. Tainer, J. Tainer, Michael J Hendzel, J. Glover, 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage.(Grant S. Stewart, Stephanie Panier, Kelly Townsend, Abdallah K. Al-Hakim, N. Kolas, Edward S. Miller, Shinichiro Nakada, J. Ylanko, Signe Olivarius, Megan Mendez, C. Oldreive, Jan Wildenhain, A. Tagliaferro, L. Pelletier, Nadine Taubenheim, A. Durandy, P. Byrd, T. Stankovic, A. Taylor, D. Durocher, 2009, Cell)
- Solving the RIDDLE of 53BP1 recruitment to sites of damage(G. Stewart, 2009, Cell Cycle)
- Topology of Ubiquitin Chains in the Chromatosomal Environment of the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase RNF168(A. Kudriaeva, L. A. Yakubova, G. A. Saratov, V. I. Vladimirov, V. M. Lipkin, A. Belogurov, 2023, Biochemistry (Moscow))
- A ubiquitin-binding protein, FAAP20, links RNF8-mediated ubiquitination to the Fanconi anemia DNA repair network.(Zhijiang Yan, R. Guo, Manikandan Paramasivam, W. Shen, Chen Ling, David A. Fox, Yucai Wang, A. Oostra, Julia Kuehl, Duck‐Yeon Lee, M. Takata, M. Hoatlin, D. Schindler, H. Joenje, J. D. de Winter, Lei Li, M. Seidman, Weidong Wang, 2012, Molecular cell)
- L3MBTL2 orchestrates ubiquitin signaling by dictating the sequential recruitment of RNF8 and RNF168 after DNA damage(S. Nowsheen, K. Aziz, Asef Aziz, M. Deng, Bo Qin, K. Luo, Karthik B. Jeganathan, Henan Zhang, Tongzheng Liu, Jia Yu, Yibin Deng, Jian Yuan, W. Ding, J. V. van Deursen, Zhenkun Lou, 2018, Nature cell biology)
RNF168 对 DNA 修复路径选择(HR vs NHEJ)的调控
研究 RNF168 及其下游效应蛋白(如 53BP1, Shieldin 复合物)如何决定双链断裂修复方式,以及其在 PALB2 招募和 BRCA1 缺陷背景下的拮抗作用。
- RNF168-mediated localization of BARD1 recruits the BRCA1-PALB2 complex to DNA damage(J. Krais, Yifan Wang, P. Patel, J. Basu, Andrea J. Bernhardy, N. Johnson, 2021, Nature Communications)
- Regulation of 53BP1 Protein Stability by RNF8 and RNF168 Is Important for Efficient DNA Double-Strand Break Repair(Yiheng Hu, Chao Wang, Kun Huang, F. Xia, J. Parvin, Neelima Mondal, 2014, PLoS ONE)
- BCL10 regulates RNF8/RNF168-mediated ubiquitination in the DNA damage response(Hongchang Zhao, Min Zhu, Gelin Dou, Hongli Zhao, Bingtao Zhu, Jing Li, Ji Liao, Xingzhi Xu, 2014, Cell Cycle)
- Cell-cycle dependent inhibition of BRCA1 signaling by the lysine methyltransferase SET8(Y. Perez, Fatima Alhourani, Julie Patouillard, C. Ribeyre, Marion Larroque, V. Baldin, D. Llères, C. Grimaud, Eric Julien, 2025, bioRxiv)
- Evolved histone tail regulates 53BP1 recruitment at damaged chromatin(Jessica L Kelliher, Melissa L Folkerts, Kaiyuan Shen, Wan Song, Kyle Tengler, C. M. Stiefel, Seong-Ok Lee, Eloise Dray, Weixing Zhao, Brian Koss, Nicholas R Pannunzio, J. Leung, 2024, Nature Communications)
- Ring Finger Nuclear Factor RNF168 Is Important for Defects in Homologous Recombination Caused by Loss of the Breast Cancer Susceptibility Factor BRCA1*(Meilen C Muñoz, Corentin Laulier, Amanda L. Gunn, Anita Cheng, D. Robbiani, A. Nussenzweig, Jeremy M. Stark, 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- 53BP1 Enforces Distinct Pre- and Post-resection Blocks on Homologous Recombination.(E. Callen, D. Zong, Wei Wu, N. Wong, A. Stanlie, Momoko Ishikawa, R. Pavani, Lavinia C. Dumitrache, Andrea K Byrum, Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, Paula Martínez, A. Canela, Yaakov Maman, Amanda M. Day, M. Kruhlak, M. Blasco, Jeremy M. Stark, N. Mosammaparast, P. Mckinnon, A. Nussenzweig, 2020, Molecular cell)
- Ectopic expression of RNF168 and 53BP1 increases mutagenic but not physiological non-homologous end joining(D. Zong, E. Callen, Gianluca Pegoraro, C. Lukas, J. Lukas, A. Nussenzweig, 2015, Nucleic Acids Research)
- DNA Repair Network Analysis Reveals Shieldin as a Key Regulator of NHEJ and PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity.(Rajat Gupta, Kumar Somyajit, Takeo Narita, Elina Maskey, A. Stanlie, M. Kremer, Dimitris Typas, M. Lammers, Niels Mailand, A. Nussenzweig, J. Lukas, Chunaram Choudhary, 2018, Cell)
- Repair versus Checkpoint Functions of BRCA1 Are Differentially Regulated by Site of Chromatin Binding.(Michael Goldstein, M. Kastan, 2015, Cancer research)
- 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair(Angela T. Noon, A. Shibata, N. Rief, M. Löbrich, G. Stewart, P. Jeggo, A. Goodarzi, 2010, Nature Cell Biology)
- A PALB2-interacting domain in RNF168 couples homologous recombination to DNA break-induced chromatin ubiquitylation(M. S. Luijsterburg, Dimitris Typas, Marie-christine Caron, W. Wiegant, D. van den Heuvel, R. Boonen, Anthony M. Couturier, L. Mullenders, J. Masson, Haico van Attikum, 2017, eLife)
- The RNF8 and RNF168 Ubiquitin Ligases Regulate Pro- and Anti-Resection Activities at Broken DNA Ends During Non-Homologous End Joining(Bo-Ruei Chen, Yinan Wang, Zih-Jie Shen, Amelia Bennett, Issa Hindi, J. Tyler, B. Sleckman, 2021, DNA repair)
- Recruitment of the cohesin loading factor NIPBL to DNA double-strand breaks depends on MDC1, RNF168 and HP1γ in human cells.(Yasuyoshi Oka, Keiji Suzuki, M. Yamauchi, N. Mitsutake, S. Yamashita, 2011, Biochemical and biophysical research communications)
RNF168 的翻译后修饰、负调控与稳态维持
关注 RNF168 的精密调节网络,包括去泛素化酶(USP3, USP7, USP11, USP34, USP44 等)、E3 酶介导的降解、RNF169 的竞争抑制,以及液-液相分离和 SUMO 化修饰的动态调控。
- USP3 controls BRCA1 “foci”(P. Raychaudhuri, 2013, Cell Cycle)
- PIN1-SUMO2/3 motif suppresses excessive RNF168 chromatin accumulation and ubiquitin signaling to promote IR resistance(Anoop S Chauhan, M. Mackintosh, Joseph Cassar, Alexander J. Lanz, Mohammed Jamshad, Hannah L Mackay, Alexander J. Garvin, Alexandra K. Walker, Satpal S. Jhujh, Teresa Carlomagno, Aneika C. Leney, Grant S. Stewart, Joanna R. Morris, 2025, Nature Communications)
- MRE11 and UBR5 Co-Operate to Suppress RNF168-Mediated Fusion of Dysfunctional Telomeres(Yongjian Tang, J. Mukherjee, R. Pieper, 2021, Frontiers in Oncology)
- The HDAC6-RNF168 axis regulates H2A/H2A.X ubiquitination to enable double-strand break repair(Lingyu Qiu, Wenchao Xu, Xiaopeng Lu, Feng Chen, Yongcan Chen, Yuan Tian, Qian Zhu, Xiangyu Liu, Yongqing Wang, X. Pei, Xingzhi Xu, Jun Zhang, Wei-Guo Zhu, 2023, Nucleic Acids Research)
- USP11 Is a Negative Regulator to γH2AX Ubiquitylation by RNF8/RNF168*(Miao Yu, Kun Liu, Z. Mao, Jianyuan Luo, W. Gu, Wenhui Zhao, 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- When cleavage is not attractive: non-catalytic inhibition of ubiquitin chains at DNA double-strand breaks by OTUB1.(Andrew N. Blackford, G. Stewart, 2011, DNA repair)
- Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks(Y. Galanty, R. Belotserkovskaya, J. Coates, S. Polo, K. Miller, S. Jackson, 2009, Nature)
- The ubiquitin specific protease USP34 promotes ubiquitin signaling at DNA double-strand breaks(Shirley M. H. Sy, Jun Jiang, W. O, Yiqun Deng, Michael S. Y. Huen, 2013, Nucleic Acids Research)
- RNF126 Quenches RNF168 Function in the DNA Damage Response(Lianzhong Zhang, Zhenzhen Wang, Ruifeng Shi, Xuefei Zhu, Jiahui Zhou, Bin Peng, Xingzhi Xu, 2018, Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics)
- UBE2D3 facilitates NHEJ by orchestrating ATM signalling through multi-level control of RNF168(Zeliha Yalçin, Shiu-Yeung Lam, Marieke H. Peuscher, Jaco van der Torre, Shan Zhu, P. V. Iyengar, D. Salas-Lloret, Inge de Krijger, Nathalie Moatti, Ruben van der Lugt, M. Falcone, Aurora Cerutti, Onno B. Bleijerveld, L. Hoekman, R. González-Prieto, J. Jacobs, 2024, Nature Communications)
- USP7 deubiquitinase promotes ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage signaling by stabilizing RNF168*(Qianzheng Zhu, Nidhi Sharma, Jinshan He, G. Wani, A. Wani, 2015, Cell Cycle)
- USP3 counteracts RNF168 via deubiquitinating H2A and γH2AX at lysine 13 and 15(Nidhi Sharma, Qianzheng Zhu, G. Wani, Jingshan He, Qi-En Wang, A. Wani, 2014, Cell Cycle)
- RNF168 ubiquitylates 53BP1 and controls its response to DNA double-strand breaks(M. Bohgaki, T. Bohgaki, Samah El Ghamrasni, Tharan Srikumar, G. Maire, Stephanie Panier, Amélie Fradet-Turcotte, G. Stewart, B. Raught, A. Hakem, R. Hakem, 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
- Regulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks.(Stephanie Panier, D. Durocher, 2009, DNA repair)
- RNF168-mediated H2A neddylation antagonizes ubiquitylation of H2A and regulates DNA damage repair(Tingting Li, Junhong Guan, Ziji Huang, Xiang Hu, Xiaofeng Zheng, 2014, Journal of Cell Science)
- The E3 ubiquitin ligase DTX3L and the deubiquitinase USP28 fine-tune DNA repair through mutual regulation of their protein levels(Daniela Mennerich, Y. Ashok, Carlos Vela-Rodríguez, Heli I. Hentilä, Melanie Rall-Scharpf, Lisa Wiesmüller, R. Prunskaite-Hyyryläinen, L. Lehtiö, Thomas Kietzmann, 2025, iScience)
- The Deubiquitylating Enzyme USP44 Counteracts the DNA Double-strand Break Response Mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 Ubiquitin Ligases*(Anna Mosbech, C. Lukas, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Niels Mailand, 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- The de-ubiquitylating enzymes USP26 and USP37 regulate homologous recombination by counteracting RAP80(Dimitris Typas, M. S. Luijsterburg, W. Wiegant, Michaela Diakatou, A. Helfricht, P. E. Thijssen, Bram van de Broek, L. Mullenders, Haico van Attikum, 2015, Nucleic Acids Research)
- Ring Finger Protein RNF169 Antagonizes the Ubiquitin-dependent Signaling Cascade at Sites of DNA Damage*(Jie Chen, W. Feng, Jun Jiang, Yiqun Deng, Michael S. Y. Huen, 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- Dub3 controls DNA damage signalling by direct deubiquitination of H2AX(M. R. Delgado-Diaz, Yusé Martín, Anna Berg, R. Freire, V. Smits, 2014, Molecular Oncology)
- USP7 saves RIDDLE for the end(T. Pandita, 2015, Cell Cycle)
- UBA80 and UBA52 fine-tune RNF168-dependent histone ubiquitination and DNA repair(Seong-Ok Lee, J. Kelliher, Wan Song, Kyle Tengler, Aradhan Sarkar, Eloise V. Dray, Justin W. C. Leung, 2023, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- SENP1 decreases RNF168 phase separation to promote DNA damage repair and drug resistance in colon cancer.(Min Wei, Xinping Huang, Limin Liao, Yonglu Tian, Xiaofeng Zheng, 2023, Cancer research)
- Ubiquitinated H2A.X-Induced RNF168 Condensation Promotes DNA Double-Strand Break Repair and Tumor Radioresistance.(L. Feng, S. Bie, X. Wan, X. Fan, Y. L. Wang, 2023, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics)
- Ubiquitin-specific Protease 11 (USP11) Deubiquitinates Hybrid Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO)-Ubiquitin Chains to Counteract RING Finger Protein 4 (RNF4)*(I. Hendriks, J. Schimmel, K. Eifler, J. Olsen, A. Vertegaal, 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
RNF168 在 DNA 复制、转录及其他非典型细胞过程中的功能
扩展 RNF168 在经典 DSB 修复之外的作用,包括复制叉保护、转录抑制、线粒体融合信号调节、自噬交互以及其在 PML 小体中的定位。
- Histone Ubiquitination by the DNA Damage Response Is Required for Efficient DNA Replication in Unperturbed S Phase.(Jonas A. Schmid, Matteo Berti, Franziska Walser, M. C. Raso, Fabian Schmid, Jana Krietsch, H. Stoy, Katharina Zwicky, Sebastian Ursich, R. Freire, Massimo Lopes, L. Penengo, 2018, Molecular cell)
- ATM‐Dependent Recruitment of BRD7 is required for Transcriptional Repression and DNA Repair at DNA Breaks Flanking Transcriptional Active Regions(K. Hu, Yu Li, Wenjing Wu, Li-min Xie, Hai-yan Yan, Yuexin Cai, Dong Chen, Q. Jiang, Le-hang Lin, Zhen Chen, Jian-You Liao, Yin Zhang, H. Koeffler, D. Yin, E. Song, 2020, Advanced Science)
- Identification of RNF168 as a PML nuclear body regulator(K. Shire, Andrew I. Wong, M. Tatham, O. Anderson, D. Ripsman, Stephanie Gulstene, J. Moffat, R. Hay, L. Frappier, 2016, Journal of Cell Science)
- Non-canonical function of DGCR8 in DNA double-strand break repair signaling and tumor radioresistance(Qinglei Hang, Liyong Zeng, Li Wang, Litong Nie, Fan Yao, Hongqi Teng, Yalan Deng, Shannon Yap, Yutong Sun, S. Frank, Junjie Chen, Li Ma, 2020, Nature Communications)
- Modulation of LSD1 phosphorylation by CK2/WIP1 regulates RNF168-dependent 53BP1 recruitment in response to DNA damage(Bin Peng, Jing Wang, Yuan Hu, Hongli Zhao, Wenya Hou, Hongchang Zhao, Hailong Wang, Ji Liao, Xingzhi Xu, 2015, Nucleic Acids Research)
- An E2-guided E3 Screen Identifies the RNF17-UBE2U Pair as Regulator of the Radiosensitivity, Immunodeficiency, Dysmorphic Features, and Learning Difficulties (RIDDLE) Syndrome Protein RNF168*(Yingying Guo, L. An, Hoi-man Ng, Shirley M. H. Sy, Michael S. Y. Huen, 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation links the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5/SNF2H to RNF168-dependent DNA damage signaling(Godelieve Smeenk, W. Wiegant, J. Marteijn, M. S. Luijsterburg, Nicholas Sroczynski, Thomas Costelloe, R. Romeijn, A. Pastink, Niels Mailand, W. Vermeulen, Haico van Attikum, 2013, Journal of Cell Science)
- A viral E3 ligase targets RNF8 and RNF168 to control histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses(C. Lilley, Mira S. Chaurushiya, Chris Boutell, S. Landry, J. Suh, Stephanie Panier, R. Everett, G. Stewart, D. Durocher, M. Weitzman, 2010, The EMBO Journal)
- Defective repair of topoisomerase I induced chromosomal damage in Huntington’s disease(Nelma M Palminha, Cleide dos Santos Souza, Jon Griffin, C. Liao, L. Ferraiuolo, S. El-khamisy, 2022, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS)
- Degradation of Ubiquitin-Editing Enzyme A20 following Autophagy Activation Promotes RNF168 Nuclear Translocation and NF-κB Activation in Lupus Nephritis(L. Zou, Ling Sun, Ruixue Hua, Yu Wu, Linlin Sun, Ting Chen, 2023, Journal of Innate Immunity)
- Autophagy Regulates Chromatin Ubiquitination in DNA Damage Response through Elimination of SQSTM1/p62.(Yanan Wang, N. Zhang, Luyao Zhang, Ran Li, Wan Fu, K. Ma, Xue Li, Lina Wang, Jiadong Wang, Hongquan Zhang, W. Gu, Wei-Guo Zhu, Ying Zhao, 2016, Molecular cell)
- RNF8-Independent Lys63 Poly-Ubiquitylation Prevents Genomic Instability in Response to Replication-Associated DNA Damage(C. Ramaekers, T. van den Beucken, R. Bristow, R. Chiu, D. Durocher, B. Wouters, 2014, PLoS ONE)
- Proteome dynamics at broken replication forks reveal a distinct ATM-directed repair response suppressing DNA double-strand break ubiquitination(Kyosuke Nakamura, Georg Kustatscher, C. Alabert, Martina Hödl, I. Forné, Moritz Völker-Albert, S. Satpathy, Tracey E. Beyer, Niels Mailand, Chunaram Choudhary, A. Imhof, J. Rappsilber, Anja Groth, 2021, Molecular Cell)
- Regulation of nuclear DNA damage response by mitochondrial morphofunctional pathway(N. Oanh, Ho-Soo Lee, Yonghyeon Kim, Sunwoo Min, Yeon-Ji Park, June Heo, Yong-Yea Park, Wonchung Lim, Hyeseong Cho, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research)
- Translational regulation of SND1 governs endothelial homeostasis during stress(Zhenbo Han, Gege Yan, Jordan Jousma, S. B. Nukala, Mehdi Amiri, Stephen J. Kiniry, Negar Tabatabaei, Youjeong Kwon, Sen Zhang, Jalees Rehman, Sandra Pinho, Sang-Bing Ong, Pavel V. Baranov, Soroush Tahmasebi, S. Ong, 2025, The Journal of Clinical Investigation)
RNF168 与 RIDDLE 综合征及人类疾病的关联
探讨 RNF168 缺陷(RIDDLE 综合征)或异常表达在癌症预后、放化疗敏感性、病毒感染(如 SARS-CoV-2)以及神经退行性疾病中的病理生理意义。
- RNF168-Mediated Ubiquitin Signaling Inhibits the Viability of BRCA1-Null Cancers(J. Krais, Yifan Wang, Andrea J. Bernhardy, Emma Clausen, Jessica A. Miller, K. Cai, C. Scott, N. Johnson, 2020, Cancer Research)
- HDAC6 as a Modulator of DNA Repair in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Perspectives.(Aneesh Mazumder, Prasenjit Mondal, Can Zhang, 2025, ACS chemical neuroscience)
- RNF8 promotes high linear energy transfer carbon-ion-induced DNA double-stranded break repair in serum-starved human cells.(N. Nakajima, M. Yamauchi, Sangeeta Kakoti, Cuihua Liu, Reona Kato, Tiara Bunga Mayang Permata, Moito Iijima, H. Yajima, Takaaki Yasuhara, S. Yamada, S. Hasegawa, A. Shibata, 2020, DNA repair)
- Tumors overexpressing RNF168 show altered DNA repair and responses to genotoxic treatments, genomic instability and resistance to proteotoxic stress(Katarína Chromá, Martin Mistrik, Pavel Moudrý, J. Gursky, M. J. Liptay, R. Strauss, Zdenek Skrott, R. Vrtel, J. Bártková, J. Kramara, Jiri Bartek, Jiri Bartek, 2017, Oncogene)
- Camptothecin resistance is determined by the regulation of topoisomerase I degradation mediated by ubiquitin proteasome pathway(K. Ando, 2017, Oncotarget)
- RNF168 is highly expressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and contributes to the malignant behaviors in association with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway(Y. Gou, Dacheng Jin, Sheng-liang He, Songchen Han, Q. Bai, 2021, Aging (Albany NY))
- TRIM39-mediated deubiquitination upregulates RNF168 to evade autophagy-ferroptosis in triple-negative breast cancer(Xiaoli Yao, Xiong Shen, Yue Fan, Hong Wang, 2025, NPJ Breast Cancer)
- RNF126, 168 and CUL1: The Potential Utilization of Multi-Functional E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Genome Maintenance for Cancer Therapy(Hae Ryung Chang, 2023, Biomedicines)
- Not Black or White but Shades of Gray: Homologous Recombination Deficiency as a Continuous Variable Modulated by RNF168(Lin Wang, G. Wulf, 2020, Cancer Research)
- SARS-CoV-2 infection induces DNA damage, through CHK1 degradation and impaired 53BP1 recruitment, and cellular senescence(Ubaldo Gioia, S. Tavella, P. Martínez-Orellana, Giada Cicio, A. Colliva, Marta Ceccon, Matteo Cabrini, Ana C. Henriques, Valeria Fumagalli, Alessia Paldino, E. Presot, Sreejith Rajasekharan, Nicola Iacomino, F. Pisati, Valentina Matti, S. Sepe, M. Conte, S. Barozzi, Z. Lavagnino, Tea Carletti, M. C. Volpe, P. Cavalcante, M. Iannacone, C. Rampazzo, R. Bussani, C. Tripodo, S. Zacchigna, A. Marcello, F. d’Adda di Fagagna, 2023, Nature Cell Biology)
- RNF168 E3 ligase participates in ubiquitin signaling and recruitment of SLX4 during DNA crosslink repair(Yoko Katsuki, Masako Abe, S. Park, Wenwen Wu, H. Yabe, M. Yabe, Haico van Attikum, Shinichiro Nakada, T. Ohta, M. Seidman, Yonghwan Kim, M. Takata, 2021, Cell reports)
- Ribosomal protein L6 (RPL6) is recruited to DNA damage sites in a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase–dependent manner and regulates the DNA damage response(Chuanzhen Yang, Weicheng Zang, Yapeng Ji, Tingting Li, Yongfeng Yang, Xiaofeng Zheng, 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry)
- USP14 is a deubiquitinase for Ku70 and critical determinant of non-homologous end joining repair in autophagy and PTEN-deficient cells(Arishya Sharma, Turkeya Alswillah, Isha Kapoor, Pal Debjani, B. Willard, Matthew K. Summers, Zihua Gong, A. Almasan, 2019, Nucleic Acids Research)
- RNF8‐ and RNF168‐dependent degradation of KDM4A/JMJD2A triggers 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites(Frédérick A. Mallette, Francesca Mattiroli, G. Cui, L. C. Young, Michael J Hendzel, G. Mer, T. Sixma, S. Richard, 2012, The EMBO Journal)
- Clinical and Biological Manifestation of RNF168 Deficiency in Two Polish Siblings(B. Pietrucha, E. Heropolitańska-Pliszka, R. Geffers, Julia Enßen, Britta Wieland, N. Bogdanova, T. Dörk, 2017, Frontiers in Immunology)
- Homozygous deficiency of ubiquitin-ligase ring-finger protein RNF168 mimics the radiosensitivity syndrome of ataxia-telangiectasia(S. Devgan, O. Sanal, C. Doil, K. Nakamura, S. Nahas, K. Pettijohn, J. Bartek, C. Lukas, J. Lukas, R. Gatti, 2011, Cell Death and Differentiation)
- New answers to the old RIDDLE: RNF168 and the DNA damage response pathway(J. Kelliher, G. Ghosal, Justin Wai Chung Leung, 2021, The FEBS Journal)
合并后的分组全面描绘了 RNF168 的多维研究版图:从底层的原子结构与核小体识别生化机制,到 RNF8-RNF168 核心信号通路的构建,再到其在 DNA 修复路径决策(HR/NHEJ)中的杠杆作用。报告同时详尽地总结了 RNF168 极其复杂的翻译后修饰调控网络(含去泛素化、相分离等前沿机制),并最终落脚于其在 RIDDLE 综合征、肿瘤防治及病毒免疫中的临床价值,为理解基因组稳定性维护提供了完整的知识框架。
总计116篇相关文献
Significance We demonstrated that RNF168 underwent liquid–liquid phase separation at the double-strand break (DSB) sites driven by both the intrinsically disordered region and the interaction with K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Irradiation-induced RNF168 condensation accelerated the accumulation of RNF168 and promoted the recruitment of downstream factors to DSB, resulting in enhanced DSB repair. Our finding is expected to provide a potential target for the prevention and intervention of irradiation damage.
Abstract Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) mediates DNA damage signaling by regulating the mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways. Whether HDAC6 also mediates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is unclear. Here, we report that HDAC6 negatively regulates DSB repair in an enzyme activity-independent manner. In unstressed cells, HDAC6 interacts with H2A/H2A.X to prevent its interaction with the E3 ligase RNF168. Upon sensing DSBs, RNF168 rapidly ubiquitinates HDAC6 at lysine 116, leading to HDAC6 proteasomal degradation and a restored interaction between RNF168 and H2A/H2A.X. H2A/H2A.X is ubiquitinated by RNF168, precipitating the recruitment of DSB repair factors (including 53BP1 and BRCA1) to chromatin and subsequent DNA repair. These findings reveal novel regulatory machinery based on an HDAC6–RNF168 axis that regulates the H2A/H2A.X ubiquitination status. Interfering with this axis might be leveraged to disrupt a key mechanism of cancer cell resistance to genotoxic damage and form a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Ubiquitination of histone is an essential process involved in DNA damage response (DSB) serving as scaffolds for DNA repair proteins, but how these factors are recruited so quickly and regulated in a spatiotemporal manner remains poorly understood. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has recently emerged as a mechanism for membraneless condensation driven by multivalent interactions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the LLPS potential of RNF168, an E3 ligase essential for DSB repair, and the mechanism underlying its-mediated tumor radio-resistance. MATERIALS/METHODS The intrinsic disordered domain (IDR) of RNF168 was determined by the PONDR website. The LLPS properties were validated by droplet formation in vivo and in vitro. RNF168-mEGFP were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified with GST tag. The synthesized K63-linked ubiquitin chains were added to mimic the interactions between RNF168 and radiation-induced ubiquitinated-histone. Effects of RNF168 LLPS on downstream proteins were verified by immunofluorescence. RESULTS RNF168-mEGFP recombinant protein formed liquid-like droplets in vivo and co-localized with γ-H2A.X foci after irradiation. The droplet's fluorescence recovered quickly after photobleaching, which could be abolished by 1,6-hexanediol treatment or ATP deprivation. Purified RNF168-mEGFP protein also condensed in vitro, and the size and number of droplets were related to protein concentration, salt concentration, pH, and temperature. Condensation of RNF168 was dependent on the IDR (323-459 amino acid), and more importantly, enhanced by synthesized K63-linked ubiquitin chains. LLPS of RNF168 was required for recruitment of RNF168 to DSB and RNF168-mediated γ-H2A.X ubiquitination. LLPS deficiency of RNF168 resulted in decreased recruitment of 53BP1, BRCA1, and RAP80 proteins, resulting in impaired DSB repair and genomic instability. Notably, higher expression of RNF168 was correlated with a poorer response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Finally, RNF168 condensate-induced tumor radioresistance was further verified in the xenograft model. CONCLUSION RNF168 undergoes LLPS at the DSB site, which is determined by both the IDR domain and the interaction with K63-linked ubiquitin chains. Radiation-induced RNF168 condensation accelerates the accumulation of RNF168 and promotes the recruitment of downstream effectors to DSB, resulting in enhanced DSB repair and tumor radioresistance.
RNF168 plays a central role in the DNA damage response (DDR) by ubiquitylating histone H2A at K13 and K15. These modifications direct BRCA1-BARD1 and 53BP1 foci formation in chromatin, essential for cell-cycle-dependent DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway selection. The mechanism by which RNF168 catalyzes the targeted accumulation of H2A ubiquitin conjugates to form repair foci around DSBs remains unclear. Here, using cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and functional assays, we provide a molecular description of the reaction cycle and dynamics of RNF168 as it modifies the nucleosome and recognizes its ubiquitylation products. We demonstrate an interaction of a canonical ubiquitin-binding domain within full-length RNF168, which not only engages ubiquitin but also the nucleosome surface, clarifying how such site-specific ubiquitin recognition propels a signal amplification loop. Beyond offering mechanistic insights into a key DDR protein, our study aids in understanding site specificity in both generating and interpreting chromatin ubiquitylation.
No abstract available
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic DNA damages that arise from endogenous processes (oxidative metabolism as well as external stressors); unrepaired DSBs are consistently found in the hippocampus and cortex of Alzheimer's disease (AD) brains and are thought to contribute to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration. A molecular axis involving histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) and an E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 168 (RNF168) is required for ubiquitination of phosphorylated histone variant H2A.X and the subsequent downstream repair pathway. Herein, we propose that disruption of the HDAC6-RNF168-H2A.X axis is a core mechanism underlying defective DSB repairs in AD and discuss the potential of selectively targeting HDAC6 to restore genomic stability in vulnerable neurons.
No abstract available
Cells respond to cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by recruiting DNA repair proteins to the damaged site. This recruitment is dependent on ubiquitylation of adjacent chromatin areas by E3 ubiquitin ligases such as RNF8 and RNF168, which are recruited sequentially to the DSBs. However, it is unclear what dictates the sequential order and recruits RNF168 to the DNA lesion. Here, we reveal that L3MBTL2 (lethal(3)malignant brain tumour-like protein 2) is the missing link between RNF8 and RNF168. We found that L3MBTL2 is recruited by MDC1 and subsequently ubiquitylated by RNF8. Ubiquitylated L3MBTL2, in turn, facilitates recruitment of RNF168 to the DNA lesion and promotes DNA DSB repair. These results identify L3MBTL2 as a key target of RNF8 following DNA damage and demonstrates how the DNA damage response pathway is orchestrated by ubiquitin signalling. Nowsheen et al. show that after DNA damage L3MBTL2 is recruited by MDC1 to DNA lesions where it is ubiquitylated by RNF8. Ubiquitylated L3MBTL2 then recruits RNF168 to promote DNA repair.
53BP1 regulates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. In functional assays for specific DSB repair pathways, we found that 53BP1 was important in the conservative non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) pathway, and this activity was dependent upon RNF8 and RNF168. We observed that 53BP1 protein was diffusely abundant in nuclei, and upon ionizing radiation, 53BP1 was everywhere degraded except at DNA damage sites. Depletion of RNF8 or RNF168 blocked the degradation of the diffusely localized nuclear 53BP1, and ionizing radiation induced foci (IRIF) did not form. Furthermore, when 53BP1 degradation was inhibited, a subset of 53BP1 was bound to DNA damage sites but bulk, unbound 53BP1 remained in the nucleoplasm, and localization of its downstream effector RIF1 at DSBs was abolished. Our data suggest a novel mechanism for responding to DSB that upon ionizing radiation, 53BP1 was divided into two populations, ensuring functional DSB repair: damage site-bound 53BP1 whose binding signal is known to be generated by RNF8 and RNF168; and unbound bulk 53BP1 whose ensuing degradation is regulated by RNF8 and RNF168.
The RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 recruit DNA damage response (DDR) factors to chromatin flanking DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) including 53BP1, which protects DNA ends from resection during DNA DSB repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Deficiency of RNF8 or RNF168 does not lead to demonstrable NHEJ defects, but like deficiency of 53BP1, the combined deficiency of XLF and RNF8 or RNF168 leads to diminished NHEJ in lymphocytes arrested in G0/G1 phase. The function of RNF8 in NHEJ depends on its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Loss of RNF8 or RNF168 in G0/G1-phase lymphocytes leads to the resection of broken DNA ends, demonstrating that RNF8 and RNF168 function to protect DNA ends from nucleases, pos sibly through the recruitment of 53BP1. However, the loss of 53BP1 leads to more severe resection than the loss of RNF8 or RNF168. Moreover, in 53BP1-deficient cells, the loss of RNF8 or RNF168 leads to diminished DNA end resection. We conclude that RNF8 and RNF168 regulate pathways that both prevent and promote DNA end resection in cells arrested in G0/G1 phase.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) elicit a ubiquitylation cascade that controls DNA repair pathway choice. This cascade involves the ubiquitylation of histone H2A by the RNF168 ligase and the subsequent recruitment of RIF1, which suppresses homologous recombination (HR) in G1 cells. The RIF1-dependent suppression is relieved in S/G2 cells, allowing PALB2-driven HR to occur. With the inhibitory impact of RIF1 relieved, it remains unclear how RNF168-induced ubiquitylation influences HR. Here, we uncover that RNF168 links the HR machinery to H2A ubiquitylation in S/G2 cells. We show that PALB2 indirectly recognizes histone ubiquitylation by physically associating with ubiquitin-bound RNF168. This direct interaction is mediated by the newly identified PALB2-interacting domain (PID) in RNF168 and the WD40 domain in PALB2, and drives DNA repair by facilitating the assembly of PALB2-containing HR complexes at DSBs. Our findings demonstrate that RNF168 couples PALB2-dependent HR to H2A ubiquitylation to promote DNA repair and preserve genome integrity. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20922.001
Summary Cells have evolved an elaborate DNA repair network to ensure complete and accurate DNA replication. Defects in these repair machineries can fuel genome instability and drive carcinogenesis while creating vulnerabilities that may be exploited in therapy. Here, we use nascent chromatin capture (NCC) proteomics to characterize the repair of replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) triggered by topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitors. We reveal profound changes in the fork proteome, including the chromatin environment and nuclear membrane interactions, and identify three classes of repair factors according to their enrichment at broken and/or stalled forks. ATM inhibition dramatically rewired the broken fork proteome, revealing that ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signalling stimulates DNA end resection, recruits PLK1, and concomitantly suppresses the canonical DSB ubiquitination response by preventing accumulation of RNF168 and BRCA1-A. This work and collection of replication fork proteomes provide a new framework to understand how cells orchestrate homologous recombination repair of replication-associated DSBs.
Repair of DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) is essential for genome integrity, and is accompanied by transcriptional repression at the DSB regions. However, the mechanisms how DNA repair induces transcriptional inhibition remain elusive. Here, it is identified that BRD7 participates in DNA damage response (DDR) and is recruited to the damaged chromatin via ATM signaling. Mechanistically, BRD7 joins the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), the nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylation (NuRD) complex at the damaged DNA and recruits E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 to the DSBs. Furthermore, ATM‐mediated BRD7 phosphorylation is required for recruitment of the PRC2 complex, NuRD complex, DSB sensor complex MRE11‐RAD50‐NBS1 (MRN), and RNF168 to the active transcription sites at DSBs, resulting in transcriptional repression and DNA repair. Moreover, BRD7 deficiency sensitizes cancer cells to PARP inhibition. Collectively, BRD7 is crucial for DNA repair and DDR‐mediated transcription repression, which may serve as a therapeutic target. The findings identify the missing link between DNA repair and transcription regulation that maintains genome integrity.
Abstract Ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are predominantly repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). IR-induced DNA damage activates autophagy, an intracellular degradation process that delivers cytoplasmic components to the lysosome. We identified the deubiquitinase USP14 as a novel autophagy substrate and a regulator of IR-induced DNA damage response (DDR) signaling. Inhibition of autophagy increased levels and DSB recruitment of USP14. USP14 antagonized RNF168-dependent ubiquitin signaling and downstream 53BP1 chromatin recruitment. Here we show that autophagy-deficient cells are defective in NHEJ, as indicated by decreased IR-induced foci (IRIF) formation by pS2056-, pT2609-DNA-PKcs, pS1778-53BP1, RIF1 and a reporter assay activation. Moreover, chromatin recruitment of key NHEJ proteins, including, Ku70, Ku80, DNA-PKcs and XLF was diminished in autophagy-deficient cells. USP14 inhibition rescued the activity of NHEJ-DDR proteins in autophagy-deficient cells. Mass spectrometric analysis identified USP14 interaction with core NHEJ proteins, including Ku70, which was validated by co-immunoprecipitation. An in vitro assay revealed that USP14 targeted Ku70 for deubiquitination. AKT, which mediates Ser432-USP14 phosphorylation, was required for IRIF formation by USP14. Similar to USP14 block, AKT inhibition rescued the activity of NHEJ-DDR proteins in autophagy- and PTEN-deficient cells. These findings reveal a novel negative PTEN/Akt-dependent regulation of NHEJ by USP14.
In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), repair proteins are recruited to the damaged sites. Ubiquitin signaling plays a critical role in coordinating protein recruitment during the DNA damage response. Here, we find that the microRNA biogenesis factor DGCR8 promotes tumor resistance to X-ray radiation independently of its Drosha-binding ability. Upon radiation, the kinase ATM and the deubiquitinase USP51 mediate the activation and stabilization of DGCR8 through phosphorylation and deubiquitination. Specifically, radiation-induced ATM-dependent phosphorylation of DGCR8 at serine 677 facilitates USP51 to bind, deubiquitinate, and stabilize DGCR8, which leads to the recruitment of DGCR8 and DGCR8’s binding partner RNF168 to MDC1 and RNF8 at DSBs. This, in turn, promotes ubiquitination of histone H2A, repair of DSBs, and radioresistance. Altogether, these findings reveal the non-canonical function of DGCR8 in DSB repair and suggest that radiation treatment may result in therapy-induced tumor radioresistance through ATM- and USP51-mediated activation and upregulation of DGCR8. The molecular mechanisms underlying cancer cell radioresistance need to be elucidated. In this study, the authors show that the microRNA biogenesis factor DGCR8 is stabilized by USP51 and ATM upon irradiation and by consequence it promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks and radioresistance by recruiting RNF168 to sites of damage.
Genomic stress leads to various forms of DNA damage, of which DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal. An army of signaling molecules is called to action as soon as these DNA breaks are detected. Various protein modifications, such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination, are an integral part of the reaction. While phosphorylation activates various proteins, ubiquitin (Ub) adducts typically act as docking sites for DNA repair factors. The response to DNA DSB starts with the protein kinase ATM phosphorylating various substrates including MDC1 and histone H2AX. This mediator protein, MDC1, then recognizes phosphorylated histone H2AX and amplifies the damage response. The E3 ligase, RNF8, recognizes and binds to phosphorylated MDC1. RNF8 then modifies an unknown protein to call a second ubiquitin ligase, RNF168, into action. It has been recognized that these two ubiquitin ligases are recruited sequentially but there is an unknown linker protein between them. These two ubiquitin ligases are crucial to the formation of DSB-associated ubiquitin conjugates and, as a result, there has been long standing interest in the field in identifying the link between the two factors. In this paper we identify lethal(3) malignant brain tumor like 2 (L3MBTL2) as the substrate of RNF8 (Nowsheen S, et al. Nat Cell Biol 20:455-464, 2018). We report that ATM-mediated phosphorylation of the polycomb group like protein L3MBTL2 and subsequent interaction with MDC1 brings it to the vicinity of the DNA lesion. RNF8 acts upon this phosphorylated L3MBTL2 and generates K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. This modified substrate is subsequently recognized by RNF168 and tethers the protein to the DNA lesion. RNF168 then ubiquitinates proteins such as histone H2A and H2AX to further amplify the damage response and recruit repair proteins such as BRCA1 and 53BP1 (Figure 1).
No abstract available
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) formed during S phase are preferentially repaired by homologous recombination (HR), whereas G1 DSBs, such as those occurring during immunoglobulin class switch recombination (CSR), are repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The DNA damage response proteins 53BP1 and BRCA1 regulate the balance between NHEJ and HR. 53BP1 promotes CSR in part by mediating synapsis of distal DNA ends, and in addition, inhibits 5’ end resection. BRCA1 antagonizes 53BP1 dependent DNA end-blocking activity during S phase, which would otherwise promote mutagenic NHEJ and genome instability. Recently, it was shown that supra-physiological levels of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 results in the hyper-accumulation of 53BP1/BRCA1 which accelerates DSB repair. Here, we ask whether increased expression of RNF168 or 53BP1 impacts physiological versus mutagenic NHEJ. We find that the anti-resection activities of 53BP1 are rate-limiting for mutagenic NHEJ but not for physiological CSR. As heterogeneity in the expression of RNF168 and 53BP1 is found in human tumors, our results suggest that deregulation of the RNF168/53BP1 pathway could alter the chemosensitivity of BRCA1 deficient tumors.
Background: The RNF8/RNF168 E3 ligase cascade promotes ubiquitin-dependent protein assembly at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Results: An overexpression screen identified new deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) opposing the RNF8/RNF168 pathway in human cells. Conclusion: USP44 counteracts RNF168-dependent ubiquitylation of proteins at DSB sites, including histone H2A. Significance: Identification of antagonizers of the RNF8/RNF168 pathway is crucial for understanding how cells regulate DSB repair. Protein recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) relies on ubiquitylation of the surrounding chromatin by the RING finger ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168. Flux through this pathway is opposed by several deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs), including OTUB1 and USP3. By analyzing the effect of individually overexpressing the majority of human DUBs on RNF8/RNF168-mediated 53BP1 retention at DSB sites, we found that USP44 and USP29 powerfully inhibited this response at the level of RNF168 accrual. Both USP44 and USP29 promoted efficient deubiquitylation of histone H2A, but unlike USP44, USP29 displayed nonspecific reactivity toward ubiquitylated substrates. Moreover, USP44 but not other H2A DUBs was recruited to RNF168-generated ubiquitylation products at DSB sites. Individual depletion of these DUBs only mildly enhanced accumulation of ubiquitin conjugates and 53BP1 at DSBs, suggesting considerable functional redundancy among cellular DUBs that restrict ubiquitin-dependent protein assembly at DSBs. Our findings implicate USP44 in negative regulation of the RNF8/RNF168 pathway and illustrate the usefulness of DUB overexpression screens for identification of antagonizers of ubiquitin-dependent cellular responses.
No abstract available
No abstract available
Timely and proper cellular response to DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genome stability and integrity. B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 10 (BCL10) facilitates ubiquitination of NEMO in the cytosol, activating NFκB signaling. Translocation and/or point mutations of BCL10 associate with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas and other malignancies. However, the mechanisms by which the resulting aberrant expression of BCL10 leads to cellular oncogenesis are poorly understood. In this report, we found that BCL10 in the nucleus is enriched at the DNA damage sites in an ATM- and RNF8-dependent manner. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of BCL10 promotes its interaction with and presentation of UBC13 to RNF8, and RNF8-mediated ubiquitination of BCL10 enhances binding of BCL10 and UBC13 to RNF168. This allows mono-ubiquitination on H2AX by RNF168 and further poly-ubiquitination by the RNF8/RNF168-containing complex. Depletion of BCL10 compromised homology recombination-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair because of insufficient recruitment of BRCA1, RAD51, and the ubiquitinated DNA damage response factors. Taken together, our results demonstrate a novel function of BCL10 in delivering UBC13 to RNF8/RNF168 to regulate ubiquitination-mediated DSB signaling and repair.
Background: RNF168 promotes chromosomal break localization of 53BP1 and BRCA1; 53BP1 loss rescues homologous recombination (HR) in BRCA1-deficient cells. Results: RNF168 depletion suppresses HR defects caused by BRCA1 silencing; RNF168 influences HR similarly to 53BP1. Conclusion: RNF168 is important for HR defects caused by BRCA1 loss. Significance: Although RNF168 promotes BRCA1 and 53BP1 localization to chromosomal breaks, RNF168 affects HR similarly to 53BP1. The RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is required for recruitment of several DNA damage response factors to double strand breaks (DSBs), including 53BP1 and BRCA1. Because 53BP1 and BRCA1 function antagonistically during the DSB repair pathway homologous recombination (HR), the influence of RNF168 on HR has been unclear. We report that RNF168 depletion causes an elevated frequency of two distinct HR pathways (homology-directed repair and single strand annealing), suppresses defects in HR caused by BRCA1 silencing, but does not suppress HR defects caused by disruption of CtIP, RAD50, BRCA2, or RAD51. Furthermore, RNF168-depleted cells can form ionizing radiation-induced foci of the recombinase RAD51 without forming BRCA1 ionizing radiation-induced foci, indicating that this loss of BRCA1 recruitment to DSBs does not reflect a loss of function during HR. Additionally, we find that RNF168 and 53BP1 have a similar influence on HR. We suggest that RNF168 is important for HR defects caused by BRCA1 loss.
The cell-killing effect of radiotherapy largely depends on unrepaired DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) or lethal chromosome aberrations induced by DSBs. Thus, the capability of DSB repair is critically important for the cancer-cell-killing effect of ionizing radiation. Here, we investigated the involvement of the DNA damage signaling factors ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ring finger protein 8 (RNF8), and RNF168 in quiescent G0/G1 cells, which are expressed in the majority of cell populations in tumors, after high linear energy transfer (LET) carbon-ion irradiation. Interestingly, ATM inhibition caused a substantial DSB repair defect after high-LET carbon-ion irradiation. Similarly, RNF8 or RNF168 depletion caused a substantial DSB repair defect. ATM inhibition did not exert an additive effect in RNF8-depleted cells, suggesting that ATM and RNF8 function in the same pathway. Importantly, we found that the RNF8 RING mutant showed a similar DSB repair defect, suggesting the requirement of ubiquitin ligase activity in this repair pathway. The RNF8 FHA domain was also required for DSB repair in this axis. Furthermore, the p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1), which is an important downstream factor in RNF8-dependent DSB repair, was also required for this repair. Importantly, either ATM inhibition or RNF8 depletion increased the frequency of chromosomal breaks, but reduced dicentric chromosome formation, demonstrating that ATM/RNF8 is required for the rejoining of DSB ends for the formation of dicentric chromosomes. Finally, we showed that RNF8 depletion augmented radiosensitivity after high-LET carbon-ion irradiation. This study suggests that the inhibition of RNF8 activity or its downstream pathway may augment the efficacy of high-LET carbon-ion therapy.
No abstract available
No abstract available
53BP1 (also called TP53BP1) is a chromatin-associated factor that promotes immunoglobulin class switching and DNA double-strand-break (DSB) repair by non-homologous end joining. To accomplish its function in DNA repair, 53BP1 accumulates at DSB sites downstream of the RNF168 ubiquitin ligase. How ubiquitin recruits 53BP1 to break sites remains unknown as its relocalization involves recognition of histone H4 Lys 20 (H4K20) methylation by its Tudor domain. Here we elucidate how vertebrate 53BP1 is recruited to the chromatin that flanks DSB sites. We show that 53BP1 recognizes mononucleosomes containing dimethylated H4K20 (H4K20me2) and H2A ubiquitinated on Lys 15 (H2AK15ub), the latter being a product of RNF168 action on chromatin. 53BP1 binds to nucleosomes minimally as a dimer using its previously characterized methyl-lysine-binding Tudor domain and a carboxy-terminal extension, termed the ubiquitination-dependent recruitment (UDR) motif, which interacts with the epitope formed by H2AK15ub and its surrounding residues on the H2A tail. 53BP1 is therefore a bivalent histone modification reader that recognizes a histone ‘code’ produced by DSB signalling.
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
A small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci
No abstract available
The correlation between ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20 and E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein (RNF) 168 has been reported to be critical for repair of DNA damage. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of this regulatory interaction in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN). The expression of RNF168 and A20 was measured in the podocytes derived from MRL/lpr murine lupus as well as patients with LN. Cell-based studies using renal podocytes bearing silenced RNF168, over-expressed A20, autophagy-related gene (Atg) 5 (a ubiquitin-like modifier), or silenced Atg5 were used to assess the effect of RNF168, A20, and Atg5 on DNA damage repair and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) activation in LN. It was found that podocyte autophagy was over-activated in LN and the abnormal podocyte autophagy led to down-regulation of A20, up-regulation of RNF168, and activation of the NF-κB. RNF168 silencing or A20 restoration inhibited activation of NF-κB pathway and promoted repair of DNA damage, where the level of autophagy was not changed. Activated A20 in podocytes weakened the promoting action of cell autophagy on RNF168. The current results suggest that RNF168 dysfunction may be involved in the pathogenesis of LN via down-regulation of A20 expression. Autophagy and RNF168 may be therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of LN.
Ribosomal proteins are the building blocks of ribosome biogenesis. Beyond their known participation in ribosome assembly, the ribosome-independent functions of ribosomal proteins are largely unknown. Here, using immunoprecipitation, subcellular fractionation, His-ubiquitin pulldown, and immunofluorescence microscopy assays, along with siRNA-based knockdown approaches, we demonstrate that ribosomal protein L6 (RPL6) directly interacts with histone H2A and is involved in the DNA damage response (DDR). We found that in response to DNA damage, RPL6 is recruited to DNA damage sites in a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)–dependent manner, promoting its interaction with H2A. We also observed that RPL6 depletion attenuates the interaction between mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) and H2A histone family member X, phosphorylated (γH2AX), impairs the accumulation of MDC1 at DNA damage sites, and reduces both the recruitment of ring finger protein 168 (RNF168) and H2A Lys-15 ubiquitination (H2AK15ub). These RPL6 depletion–induced events subsequently inhibited the recruitment of the following downstream repair proteins: tumor protein P53-binding protein 1 (TP53BP1) and BRCA1, DNA repair-associated (BRCA1). Moreover, the RPL6 knockdown resulted in defects in the DNA damage–induced G2–M checkpoint, DNA damage repair, and cell survival. In conclusion, our study identifies RPL6 as a critical regulatory factor involved in the DDR. These findings expand our knowledge of the extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins in cell physiology and deepen our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying DDR regulation.
E3 ubiquitin ligase RING finger protein 168 (RNF168) is one of the key proteins in DNA damage repair. Abnormal expression of RNF168 has recently been found in some tumors. However, the role of RNF168 in the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been fully elucidated. Here we report that expression of RNF168 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is increased with respect to normal esophageal epithelial tissue. Notably, in ESCC patients, increased RNF168 expression was associated with tumor stage and depth of invasion. Knockdown of the RNF168 gene inhibited proliferation of esophageal cancer cells, promoted cell apoptosis, and interfered with cell movement, ultimately inhibiting tumor xenograft growth. Mechanistic studies showed that RNF168 influenced the malignant behavior of esophageal cancer cells by regulating the Wnt/ β-catenin signaling pathway. In addition, RNF168 expression was positively correlated with wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 3A (WNT3A) expression, and high expression of RNF168 and WNT3A predicted a low survival rate. In conclusion, our findings highlight the important role of RNF168 in ESCC tumorigenesis and provide new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of ESCC.
Background: RNF4 is a ubiquitin ligase targeted to SUMOylated proteins. Results: USP11 co-purified with RNF4 and can remove ubiquitin polymers attached to SUMO chains. Conclusion: USP11 is a ubiquitin protease with the ability to counteract RNF4 in the DNA damage response. Significance: Identification of a ubiquitin protease to balance the activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase. Ring finger protein 4 (RNF4) is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase with a pivotal function in the DNA damage response (DDR). SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) in the N-terminal part of RNF4 tightly bind to SUMO polymers, and RNF4 can ubiquitinate these polymers in vitro. Using a proteomic approach, we identified the deubiquitinating enzyme ubiquitin-specific protease 11 (USP11), a known DDR-component, as a functional interactor of RNF4. USP11 can deubiquitinate hybrid SUMO-ubiquitin chains to counteract RNF4. SUMO-enriched nuclear bodies are stabilized by USP11, which functions downstream of RNF4 as a counterbalancing factor. In response to DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate, USP11 could counteract RNF4 to inhibit the dissolution of nuclear bodies. Thus, we provide novel insight into cross-talk between ubiquitin and SUMO and uncover USP11 and RNF4 as a balanced SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase/protease pair with a role in the DDR.
The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage.
No abstract available
Protein ubiquitination has emerged as a pivotal regulatory reaction that promotes cellular responses to DNA damage. With a goal to delineate the DNA damage signal transduction cascade, we systematically analyzed the human E2 ubiquitin- and ubiquitin-like-conjugating enzymes for their ability to mobilize the DNA damage marker 53BP1 onto ionizing radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks. An RNAi-based screen identified UBE2U as a candidate regulator of chromatin responses at double strand breaks. Further mining of the UBE2U interactome uncovered its cognate E3 RNF17 as a novel factor that, via the radiosensitivity, immunodeficiency, dysmorphic features, and learning difficulties (RIDDLE) syndrome protein RNF168, enforces DNA damage responses. Our screen allowed us to uncover new players in the mammalian DNA damage response and highlights the instrumental roles of ubiquitin machineries in promoting cell responses to genotoxic stress.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the RNA virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Although SARS-CoV-2 was reported to alter several cellular pathways, its impact on DNA integrity and the mechanisms involved remain unknown. Here we show that SARS-CoV-2 causes DNA damage and elicits an altered DNA damage response. Mechanistically, SARS-CoV-2 proteins ORF6 and NSP13 cause degradation of the DNA damage response kinase CHK1 through proteasome and autophagy, respectively. CHK1 loss leads to deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) shortage, causing impaired S-phase progression, DNA damage, pro-inflammatory pathways activation and cellular senescence. Supplementation of deoxynucleosides reduces that. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 N-protein impairs 53BP1 focal recruitment by interfering with damage-induced long non-coding RNAs, thus reducing DNA repair. Key observations are recapitulated in SARS-CoV-2-infected mice and patients with COVID-19. We propose that SARS-CoV-2, by boosting ribonucleoside triphosphate levels to promote its replication at the expense of dNTPs and by hijacking damage-induced long non-coding RNAs’ biology, threatens genome integrity and causes altered DNA damage response activation, induction of inflammation and cellular senescence. Gioia, Tavella et al. show that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causes DNA damage through CHK1 degradation and impairs 53BP1 recruitment to DNA lesions. The induced DNA damage is associated with expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and senescence markers.
The chromatin‐based DNA damage response pathway is tightly orchestrated by histone post‐translational modifications, including histone H2A ubiquitination. Ubiquitination plays an integral role in regulating cellular processes including DNA damage signaling and repair. The ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF168 is essential in assembling a cohort of DNA repair proteins at the damaged chromatin via its enzymatic activity. RNF168 ubiquitinates histone H2A(X) at the N terminus and generates a specific docking scaffold for ubiquitin‐binding motif‐containing proteins. The regulation of RNF168 at damaged chromatin and the mechanistic implication in the recruitment of DNA repair proteins to the damaged sites remain an area of active investigation. Here, we review the function and regulation of RNF168 in the context of ubiquitin‐mediated DNA damage signaling and repair. We will also discuss the unanswered questions that require further investigation and how understanding RNF168 targeting specificity could benefit the therapeutic development for cancer treatment.
RNF8‐ubiquitinated KMT5A is required for RNF168‐induced H2A ubiquitination in response to DNA damage
Histone modifications play critical roles in DNA damage repair to safeguard genome integrity. However, how different histone modifiers coordinate to build appropriate chromatin context for DNA damage repair is largely unknown. Here, we report a novel interplay between the histone methyltransferase KMT5A and two E3 ligases RNF8 and RNF168 in establishing the histone modification status for DNA damage repair. KMT5A is a newly identified substrate of RNF8 in vitro and in vivo. In response to DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs), RNF8 promotes KMT5A recruitment onto damaged chromatin in a ubiquitination‐dependent manner. RNF8‐induced KMT5A ubiquitination increases the binding capacity of KMT5A to RNF168. Interestingly, KMT5A not only drives a local increase in H4K20 monomethylation at DSBs, but also promotes RNF168’s activity in catalyzing H2A ubiquitination. We proved that the interaction between the H2A acidic patch and KMT5A R188/R189 residues is critical for KMT5A‐mediated regulation of H2A ubiquitination. Taken together, our results highlight a new role for KMT5A in linking H4K20 methylation and H2A ubiquitination and provide insight into the histone modification network during DNA damage repair.
Histone ubiquitinations are critical for the activation of the DNA damage response (DDR). In particular, RNF168 and RING1B/BMI1 function in the DDR by ubiquitinating H2A/H2AX on Lys-13/15 and Lys-118/119, respectively. However, it remains to be defined how the ubiquitin pathway engages chromatin to provide regulation of ubiquitin targeting of specific histone residues. Here we identify the nucleosome acid patch as a critical chromatin mediator of H2A/H2AX ubiquitination (ub). The acidic patch is required for RNF168- and RING1B/BMI1-dependent H2A/H2AXub in vivo. The acidic patch functions within the nucleosome as nucleosomes containing a mutated acidic patch exhibit defective H2A/H2AXub by RNF168 and RING1B/BMI1 in vitro. Furthermore, direct perturbation of the nucleosome acidic patch in vivo by the expression of an engineered acidic patch interacting viral peptide, LANA, results in defective H2AXub and RNF168-dependent DNA damage responses including 53BP1 and BRCA1 recruitment to DNA damage. The acidic patch therefore is a critical nucleosome feature that may serve as a scaffold to integrate multiple ubiquitin signals on chromatin to compose selective ubiquitinations on histones for DNA damage signaling.
Ubiquitination of chromatin by modification of histone H2A is a critical step in both regulation of DNA repair and regulation of cell fate. These very different outcomes depend on the selective modification of distinct lysine residues in H2A, each by a specific E3 ligase. While polycomb PRC1 complexes modify K119, resulting in gene silencing, the E3 ligase RNF168 modifies K13/15, which is a key event in the response to DNA double-strand breaks. The molecular origin of ubiquitination site specificity by these related E3 enzymes is one of the open questions in the field. Using a combination of NMR spectroscopy, crosslinking mass-spectrometry, mutagenesis and data-driven modelling, here we show that RNF168 binds the acidic patch on the nucleosome surface, directing the E2 to the target lysine. The structural model highlights the role of E3 and nucleosome in promoting ubiquitination and provides a basis for understanding and engineering of chromatin ubiquitination specificity. Ubiquitination of histone H2A can occur on distinct lysine residues, but how each site is recognised by the specific E3 ligase remains poorly understood. Here the authors demonstrate that the E3 ligase RNF168 binds the acidic patch on the nucleosome surface, directing the E2 to the target lysine K13/K15.
Histone ubiquitination plays an important role in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. RNF168 catalyzes H2A and H2AX ubiquitination on lysine 13/15 (K13/K15) upon DNA damage and promotes the accrual of downstream repair factors at damaged chromatin. Here, we report that RNF168 ubiquitinates the non-canonical H2A variants H2AZ and macroH2A1/2 at the divergent N-terminal tail lysine residue. In addition to their evolutionarily conserved nucleosome acidic patch, we identify the positively charged alpha1-extension helix as essential for RNF168-mediated ubiquitination of H2A variants. Moreover, mutation of the RNF168 UMI (UIM- and MIU-related UBD) hydrophilic acidic residues abolishes RNF168-mediated ubiquitination as well as 53BP1 and BRCA1 ionizing radiation-induced foci formation. Our results reveal a juxtaposed bipartite electrostatic interaction utilized by the nucleosome to direct RNF168 orientation towards the target lysine residues in proximity to the H2A alpha1-extension helix, which plays an important role in the DDR pathway. Histone ubiquitination plays a critical role in the DNA damage response pathway. Here the authors reveal how RNF168 ubiquitinates the H2A family including noncanonical variants, H2AZ and macroH2A1/2, at the divergent N-terminal tail lysine residue.
No abstract available
No abstract available
The ubiquitin signaling pathway is crucial for the DNA damage response pathway. More specifically, RNF168 is integral in regulating DNA repair proteins at damaged chromatin. However, the detailed mechanism by which RNF168 is regulated in cells is not fully understood. Here, we identify the ubiquitin-ribosomal fusion proteins UBA80 (also known as RPS27A) and UBA52 (also known as RPL40) as interacting proteins for H2A/H2AX histones and RNF168. Both UBA80 and UBA52 are recruited to laser-induced micro-irradiation DNA damage sites and are required for DNA repair. Ectopic expression of UBA80 and UBA52 inhibits RNF168-mediated H2A/H2AX ubiquitination at K13/15 and impairs 53BP1 recruitment to DNA lesions. Mechanistically, the C-terminal ribosomal fragments of UBA80 and UBA52, S27A and L40, respectively, limit RNF168-nucleosome engagement by masking the regulatory acidic residues at E143/E144 and the nucleosome acidic patch. Together, our results reveal that UBA80 and UBA52 antagonize the ubiquitination signaling pathway and fine-tune the spatiotemporal regulation of DNA repair proteins at DNA damage sites.
During DNA damage response, the RING E3 ligase RNF168 ubiquitinates nucleosomal H2A at K13–15. Here we show that the ubiquitination reaction is regulated by its substrate. We define a region on the RING domain important for target recognition and identify the H2A/H2B dimer as the minimal substrate to confer lysine specificity to the RNF168 reaction. Importantly, we find an active role for the substrate in the reaction. H2A/H2B dimers and nucleosomes enhance the E3-mediated discharge of ubiquitin from the E2 and redirect the reaction towards the relevant target, in a process that depends on an intact acidic patch. This active contribution of a region distal from the target lysine provides regulation of the specific K13–15 ubiquitination reaction during the complex signalling process at DNA damage sites. The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 ubiquitinates specific lysines on histone H2A as part of the DNA damage response. Here, the authors show that the acidic patch on the histone H2A/H2B dimer catalyses RNF168-dependent ubiquitination of histone 2A by redirecting ubiquitination activity towards the relevant target lysines.
The DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for the maintenance of genomic stability. Protein posttranslational modifications play pivotal roles in regulating the DDR process. Here, we found that SUMOylated RNF168 undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), which restricts the recruitment of RNF168 to DNA damage sites, reduces RNF168-catalyzed H2A ubiquitination, restrains 53BP1 in nuclear condensates, and ultimately impairs non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) repair efficiency. SENP1 was identified as a specific deSUMOylase of RNF168, and it was highly expressed in colorectal adenocarcinoma. In response to DNA damage, SENP1 decreased RNF168 SUMOylation and prevented RNF168 from forming nuclear condensates, thus promoting damage repair efficiency and cancer cell resistance to DNA damaging agents. Moreover, high SENP1 expression correlated with poor prognosis in cancer patients, and SENP1 depletion sensitized cancer cells to chemotherapy. In summary, these findings reveal DDR is suppressed by SUMOylation-induced LLPS of RNF168 and suggest that SENP1 is a potential target for cancer therapy.
BackgroundModulation of chromatin structure has emerged as a critical molecular device to control gene expression. Histones undergo different post-translational modifications that increase chromatin accessibility to a number of regulatory factors. Among them, histone ubiquitination appears relevant in nuclear processes that govern gene silencing, either by inhibiting or activating transcription, and maintain genome stability, acting as scaffold to properly organize the DNA damage response. Thus, it is of paramount importance the identification and the characterization of new ubiquitin ligases that address histones.ResultsWe identified and characterized RNF168, a new chromatin-associated RING finger protein. We demonstrated that RNF168 is endowed with ubiquitin ligase activity both in vitro and in vivo, which targets histones H2A and H2AX, but not H2B, forming K63 polyubiquitin chains. We previously described the presence within RNF168 sequence of two MIU domains, responsible for the binding to ubiquitinated proteins. Here we showed that inactivation of the MIUs impairs ubiquitin binding ability in vitro and reduces chromatin association of RNF168 in vivo. Moreover, upon formation of DNA double strand breaks induced by chemical and physical agents, RNF168 is recruited to the DNA damage foci, where it co-localizes with γH2AX and 53BP1. The localization of RNF168 at the site of damage highly increases the local concentration of ubiquitinated proteins and determines the prolonged ubiquitination signal.ConclusionThe RING finger protein RNF168 is a new ubiquitin ligase that functions as chromatin modifier, through histone ubiquitination. We hypothesize a dual function for RNF168. In normal condition RNF168 modifies chromatin structure by modulating ubiquitination of histone H2A. Upon DNA lesions, RNF168 is recruited to DNA damage response foci where it contributes to increase the amount of ubiquitinated proteins, thereby facilitating the downstream signalling cascade.
Genome stability is critical for normal functioning of cells and depends on accuracy of DNA replication, chromosome segregation, and DNA repair. Cellular defense mechanisms against DNA damage are important for preventing the development of cancer and aging. The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 of the RING superfamily is an essential component of the complex responsible for the ubiquitination of H2A/H2A.X histones near DNA double-strand breaks, which is a key step in attracting repair factors to the injury site. In this study, we unequivocally showed that RNF168 does not have ability to directly distinguish the architecture of polyubiquitin chains, except for tropism of its two ubiquitin-binding domains UDM1/2 to K63 ubiquitin chains. Analysis of the intracellular chromatosomal environment of full-length RNF168 and its domains by ligand-induced bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) revealed that the C-terminal part of UDM1 is associated with K63 ubiquitin chains; RING and the N-terminal part of UDM2 are sterically close to K63- and K48- ubiquitin chains, while the C-terminal part of UDM1 is colocalized with all possible ubiquitin variants. Our observations together with the available structural data suggest that the C-terminal part of UDM1 binds K63 polyubiquitin chains on linker histone H1; RING and the N-terminal part of UDM2 are located in the central part of the nucleosome and sterically close to H1 and K48-ubiquitinated alternative substrates of RNF168, such as JMJD2A/B demethylases, while the C-terminal part of UDM1 is in the region of an activated ubiquitin residue associated with E2 ubiquitin ligase, engaged by RNF168.
No abstract available
DNA damage prompts a diverse range of alterations to the chromatin landscape. The RNF168 E3 ubiquitin ligase catalyzes the mono-ubiquitination of histone H2A at lysine (K)13/15 (mUb-H2A), forming a binding module for DNA repair proteins. BRCA1 promotes homologous recombination (HR), in part, through its interaction with PALB2, and the formation of a larger BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 (BRCA1-P) complex. The mechanism by which BRCA1-P is recruited to chromatin surrounding DNA breaks is unclear. In this study, we reveal that an RNF168-governed signaling pathway is responsible for localizing the BRCA1-P complex to DNA damage. Using mice harboring a Brca1CC (coiled coil) mutation that blocks the Brca1-Palb2 interaction, we uncovered an epistatic relationship between Rnf168− and Brca1CC alleles, which disrupted development, and reduced the efficiency of Palb2-Rad51 localization. Mechanistically, we show that RNF168-generated mUb-H2A recruits BARD1 through a BRCT domain ubiquitin-dependent recruitment motif (BUDR). Subsequently, BARD1-BRCA1 accumulate PALB2-RAD51 at DNA breaks via the CC domain-mediated BRCA1-PALB2 interaction. Together, these findings establish a series of molecular interactions that connect the DNA damage signaling and HR repair machinery. The BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 (BRCA1-P) complex is well known to play a fundamental role in DNA repair, but how the complex recruitment is regulated is still a matter of interest. Here the authors reveal mechanistic insights into RNF168 activity being responsible for PALB2 recruitment, through BARD1-BRCA1 during homologous recombination repair.
Ubiquitination regulates numerous cellular processes by generating a versatile communication system based on eight structurally and functionally different chains linked through distinct residues. Except for K48 and K63, the biological relevance of different linkages is largely unclear. Here, we show that RNF168 ubiquitin ligase promotes noncanonical K27-linked ubiquitination both in vivo and in vitro. We demonstrate that residue K27 of ubiquitin (UbK27) is required for RNF168-dependent chromatin ubiquitination, by targeting histones H2A/H2A.X, and that it is the major ubiquitin-based modification marking chromatin upon DNA damage. Indeed, UbK27 is strictly required for the proper activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) and is directly recognized by crucial DDR mediators, namely 53BP1, Rap80, RNF168, and RNF169. Mutation of UbK27 has dramatic consequences on DDR activation, preventing the recruitment of 53BP1 and BRCA1 to DDR foci. Similarly to the DDR, atypical ubiquitin chains could play unanticipated roles in other crucial ubiquitin-mediated biological processes.
No abstract available
Ubiquitin-dependent signaling during the DNA damage response (DDR) to double-strand breaks (DSBs) is initiated by two E3 ligases, RNF8 and RNF168, targeting histone H2A and H2AX. RNF8 is the first ligase recruited to the damage site, and RNF168 follows RNF8-dependent ubiquitination. This suggests that RNF8 initiates H2A/H2AX ubiquitination with K63-linked ubiquitin chains and RNF168 extends them. Here, we show that RNF8 is inactive toward nucleosomal H2A, whereas RNF168 catalyzes the monoubiquitination of the histones specifically on K13-15. Structure-based mutagenesis of RNF8 and RNF168 RING domains shows that a charged residue determines whether nucleosomal proteins are recognized. We find that K63 ubiquitin chains are conjugated to RNF168-dependent H2A/H2AX monoubiquitination at K13-15 and not on K118-119. Using a mutant of RNF168 unable to target histones but still catalyzing ubiquitin chains at DSBs, we show that ubiquitin chains per se are insufficient for signaling, but RNF168 target ubiquitination is required for DDR.
DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for maintaining genome stability and protecting cells from tumorigenesis. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications play an important role in DDR, from signaling DNA damage to mediating DNA repair. In this report, we found that the E3 ligase ring finger protein 126 (RNF126) was recruited to UV laser micro-irradiation-induced stripes in a RNF8-dependent manner. RNF126 directly interacted with and ubiquitinated another E3 ligase, RNF168. Overexpression of wild type RNF126, but not catalytically-inactive mutant RNF126 (CC229/232AA), diminished ubiquitination of H2A histone family member X (H2AX), and subsequent bleomycin-induced focus formation of total ubiquitin FK2, TP53-binding protein 1 (53BP1), and receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80). Interestingly, both RNF126 overexpression and RNF126 downregulation compromised homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Taken together, our findings demonstrate that RNF126 negatively regulates RNF168 function in DDR and its appropriate cellular expression levels are essential for HR-mediated DSB repair.
No abstract available
In this issue of Cancer Research, the study by Krais and colleagues underscores that DNA damage repair by homologous recombination (HR) is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon, but that HR competency comes on a spectrum, ranging from complete deficiency to proficiency. Residual low-level HR in BRCA1-mutant cancer cells turns out to be critically important for their survival and is afforded by low levels of Histone 2A (H2A) ubiquitination resulting from lowered RNF168 levels. The findings raise the possibility that, if ubiquitination of H2A could be enforced by inhibition of deubiquitinases, residual HR in BRCA1mt cells might be extinguished. Extinction of residual HR might improve the therapeutic efficacy of the emerging inhibitors of DNA damage repair. The development of methods to measure HR directly and quantitatively is crucial to develop this field. See related article by Krais et al., p. 2848
Chromatin ubiquitination by the ubiquitin ligase RNF168 is critical to regulate the DNA damage response (DDR). DDR deficiencies lead to cancer-prone syndromes, but whether this reflects DNA repair defects is still elusive. We identified key factors of the RNF168 pathway as essential mediators of efficient DNA replication in unperturbed S phase. We found that loss of RNF168 leads to reduced replication fork progression and to reversed fork accumulation, particularly evident at repetitive sequences stalling replication. Slow fork progression depends on MRE11-dependent degradation of reversed forks, implicating RNF168 in reversed fork protection and restart. Consistent with regular nucleosomal organization of reversed forks, the replication function of RNF168 requires H2A ubiquitination. As this novel function is shared with the key DDR players ATM, γH2A.X, RNF8, and 53BP1, we propose that double-stranded ends at reversed forks engage classical DDR factors, suggesting an alternative function of this pathway in preventing genome instability and human disease.
A viral E3 ligase targets RNF8 and RNF168 to control histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses
No abstract available
No abstract available
Proper DNA damage response is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. The E3 ligase RNF168 deficiency fully prevents both the initial recruitment and retention of 53BP1 at sites of DNA damage. In response to DNA damage, RNF168-dependent recruitment of the lysine-specific demethylase LSD1 to the site of DNA damage promotes local H3K4me2 demethylation and ubiquitination of H2A/H2AX, facilitating 53BP1 recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Alternatively, RNF168-mediated K63-linked ubiquitylation of 53BP1 is required for the initial recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage and for its function in repair. We demonstrated here that phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of LSD1 at S131 and S137 was mediated by casein kinase 2 (CK2) and wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1), respectively. LSD1, RNF168 and 53BP1 interacted with each other directly. CK2-mediated phosphorylation of LSD1 exhibited no impact on its interaction with 53BP1, but promoted its interaction with RNF168 and RNF168-dependent 53BP1 ubiquitination and subsequent recruitment to the DNA damage sites. Furthermore, overexpression of phosphorylation-defective mutants failed to restore LSD1 depletion-induced cellular sensitivity to DNA damage. Taken together, our results suggest that LSD1 phosphorylation modulated by CK2/WIP1 regulates RNF168-dependent 53BP1 recruitment directly in response to DNA damage and cellular sensitivity to DNA damaging agents.
No abstract available
The mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 facilitate recruitment of the DNA damage response protein 53BP1 to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The mechanism involves recruitment of RNF8, followed by recruitment of RNF168, which ubiquitinates histones H2A/H2AX on K15. 53BP1 then binds to nucleosomes at sites of DNA DSBs by recognizing, in addition to methyl marks, histone H2A/H2AX ubiquitinated on K15. We report here that expressing H2AX fusion proteins with N-terminal bulky moieties can rescue 53BP1 recruitment to sites of DNA DSBs in cells lacking RNF8 or RNF168 or in cells treated with proteasome inhibitors, in which histone ubiquitination at sites of DNA DSBs is compromised. The rescue required S139 at the C-terminus of the H2AX fusion protein and was occasionally accompanied by partial rescue of ubiquitination at sites of DNA DSBs. We conclude that recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA DSBs is possible in the absence of RNF8 or RNF168, but still dependent on chromatin ubiquitination.
No abstract available
No abstract available
Topoisomerase1 (TOP1)-mediated chromosomal breaks are endogenous sources of DNA damage that affect neuronal genome stability. Whether TOP1 DNA breaks are sources of genomic instability in Huntington’s disease (HD) is unknown. Here, we report defective 53BP1 recruitment in multiple HD cell models, including striatal neurons derived from HD patients. Defective 53BP1 recruitment is due to reduced H2A ubiquitination caused by the limited RNF168 activity. The reduced availability of RNF168 is caused by an increased interaction with p62, a protein involved in selective autophagy. Depletion of p62 or disruption of the interaction between RNAF168 and p62 was sufficient to restore 53BP1 enrichment and subsequent DNA repair in HD models, providing new opportunities for therapeutic interventions. These findings are reminiscent to what was described for p62 accumulation caused by C9orf72 expansion in ALS/FTD and suggest a common mechanism by which protein aggregation perturb DNA repair signaling.
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are lesions in DNA that, if not properly repaired, can cause genomic instability, oncogenesis, and cell death. Multiple chromatin posttranslational modifications (PTMs) play a role in the DNA damage response to DSBs. Among these, RNF168-mediated ubiquitination of lysines 13 or 15 at the N-terminal tail of histone H2A (H2AK13/15Ub) is essential for the recruitment of effectors of both the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathways. Thus, tools and techniques to track the spatiotemporal dynamics of H2AK13/15 ubiquitination at DNA DSBs are important to facilitate studies of DNA repair. Previous work from other groups used the minimal focus-forming region (FFR) of the NHEJ effector 53BP1 to detect H2AK15Ub generated upon damage induced by gamma or laser irradiation in live cells. However, 53BP1-FFR only binds nucleosomes modified with both H2AK15Ub and dimethylation of lysine 20 on histone H4 (H4K20me2); thus, 53BP1-FFR does not recognize H2AK13Ub-nucleosomes or nucleosomes that contain H2AK15Ub but lack methylation of H4K20 (H4K20me0). To overcome this limitation, we developed an avidity-based sensor that binds H2AK13/15Ub without dependence on the methylation status of histone H4K20. This sensor, called Reader1.0, detects DNA damage-associated H2AK13/15Ub in live cells with high sensitivity and selectivity. Here, we present a protocol to detect the formation of H2AK13/15Ub at laser-induced DSBs using Reader1.0 as a live-cell reporter for this histone PTM. Graphic abstract.
No abstract available
No abstract available
The master DNA damage repair histone protein, H2AX, is essential for orchestrating the recruitment of downstream mediator and effector proteins at damaged chromatin. The phosphorylation of H2AX at S139, γH2AX, is well-studied for its DNA repair function. However, the extended C-terminal tail is not characterized. Here, we define the minimal motif on H2AX for the canonical function in activating the MDC1-RNF8-RNF168 phosphorylation-ubiquitination pathway that is important for recruiting repair proteins, such as 53BP1 and BRCA1. Interestingly, H2AX recruits 53BP1 independently from the MDC1-RNF8-RNF168 pathway through its evolved C-terminal linker region with S139 phosphorylation. Mechanistically, 53BP1 recruitment to damaged chromatin is mediated by the interaction between the H2AX C-terminal tail and the 53BP1 Oligomerization-Tudor domains. Moreover, γH2AX-linker mediated 53BP1 recruitment leads to camptothecin resistance in H2AX knockout cells. Overall, our study uncovers an evolved mechanism within the H2AX C-terminal tail for regulating DNA repair proteins at damaged chromatin. Histone H2AX is a central regulator in DNA repair. Here, the authors show that the H2AX C-terminal linker mediates recruitment of 53BP1, a mechanism which evolved to function independently of the canonical phospho-ubiquitin axis important for DNA repair regulation.
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
Maintenance of genome integrity requires tight control of DNA damage response (DDR) signalling and repair, with phosphorylation and ubiquitination representing key elements. How these events are coordinated to achieve productive DNA repair remains elusive. Here we identify the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2D3 as a regulator of ATM kinase-induced DDR that promotes non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) at telomeres. UBE2D3 contributes to DDR-induced chromatin ubiquitination and recruitment of the NHEJ-promoting factor 53BP1, both mediated by RNF168 upon ATM activation. Additionally, UBE2D3 promotes NHEJ by limiting RNF168 accumulation and facilitating ATM-mediated phosphorylation of KAP1-S824. Mechanistically, defective KAP1-S824 phosphorylation and telomeric NHEJ upon UBE2D3-deficiency are linked to RNF168 hyperaccumulation and aberrant PP2A phosphatase activity. Together, our results identify UBE2D3 as a multi-level regulator of NHEJ that orchestrates ATM and RNF168 activities. Moreover, they reveal a negative regulatory circuit in the DDR that is constrained by UBE2D3 and consists of RNF168- and phosphatase-mediated restriction of KAP1 phosphorylation. Ubiquitin system factors are critical regulators of DNA repair pathways. Through a functional genetic screen, the authors identify a novel role of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2D3 in promoting DNA repair at deprotected telomeres by limiting the accumulation of RNF168 and promoting ample ATM-dependent phosphorylation of KAP1.
53BP1 activity drives genome instability and lethality in BRCA1-deficient mice by inhibiting homologous recombination (HR). The anti-recombinogenic functions of 53BP1 require phosphorylation-dependent interactions with PTIP and RIF1/shieldin effector complexes. While RIF1/shieldin blocks 5'-3' nucleolytic processing of DNA ends, it remains unclear how PTIP antagonizes HR. Here, we show that mutation of the PTIP interaction site in 53BP1 (S25A) allows sufficient DNA2-dependent end resection to rescue the lethality of BRCA1Δ11 mice, despite increasing RIF1 "end-blocking" at DNA damage sites. However, double-mutant cells fail to complete HR, as excessive shieldin activity also inhibits RNF168-mediated loading of PALB2/RAD51. As a result, BRCA1Δ1153BP1S25A mice exhibit hallmark features of HR insufficiency, including premature aging and hypersensitivity to PARPi. Disruption of shieldin or forced targeting of PALB2 to ssDNA in BRCA1D1153BP1S25A cells restores RNF168 recruitment, RAD51 nucleofilament formation, and PARPi resistance. Our study therefore reveals a critical function of shieldin post-resection that limits the loading of RAD51.
This study explores the concept that homologous recombination DNA repair is not an all-or-nothing concept, but a spectrum, and that where a tumor stands on this spectrum may have therapeutic relevance. BRCA1 gene mutations impair homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, resulting in cellular senescence and embryonic lethality in mice. Therefore, BRCA1-deficient cancers require adaptations that prevent excessive genomic alterations from triggering cell death. RNF168-mediated ubiquitination of γH2AX at K13/15 (ub-H2AX) serves as a recruitment module for the localization of 53BP1 to DNA break sites. Here, we found multiple BRCA1-mutant cancer cell lines and primary tumors with low levels of RNF168 protein expression. Overexpression of ectopic RNF168 or a ub-H2AX fusion protein induced cell death and delayed BRCA1-mutant tumor formation. Cell death resulted from the recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA break sites and inhibition of DNA end resection. Strikingly, reintroduction of BRCA1 or 53BP1 depletion restored HR and rescued the ability of cells to maintain RNF168 and ub-H2AX overexpression. Thus, downregulation of RNF168 protein expression is a mechanism for providing BRCA1-null cancer cell lines with a residual level of HR that is essential for viability. Overall, our work identifies loss of RNF168 ubiquitin signaling as a proteomic alteration that supports BRCA1-mutant carcinogenesis. We propose that restoring RNF168-ub-H2AX signaling, potentially through inhibition of deubiquitinases, could represent a new therapeutic approach. Significance: This study explores the concept that homologous recombination DNA repair is not an all-or-nothing concept, but a spectrum, and that where a tumor stands on this spectrum may have therapeutic relevance. See related commentary by Wang and Wulf, p. 2720
TRF2 is part of the shelterin complex that hides telomeric DNA ends and prevents the activation of the cNHEJ pathway that can lead to chromosomal fusion. TRF2, however, also actively suppresses the cNHEJ pathway by recruiting two proteins, MRE11 and UBR5. MRE11 binds BRCC3, which in turn deubiquitinates γH2AX deposited at exposed telomeric DNA ends and limits RNF168 recruitment to the telomere. UBR5, in contrast directly ubiquitinates and destroys RNF168. The loss of telomeric RNF168 in turn blocks the subsequent recruitment of 53BP1 and prevents the cNHEJ-mediated fusion of chromosomes with exposed telomeric DNA ends. Although MRE11 and UBR5 are both involved in the control of telomeric RNF168 levels and the chromosome fusion process, their relative contributions have not been directly addressed. To do so we genetically suppressed MRE11 and UBR5 alone or in combination in glioma cell lines which we previously showed contained dysfunctional telomeres that were dependent on TRF2 for suppression of telomeric fusion and monitored the effects on events associated with telomere fusion. We here show that while suppression of either MRE11 or UBR5 alone had minimal effects on RNF168 telomeric accumulation, 53BP1 recruitment, and telomeric fusion, their combined suppression led to significant increases in RNF168 and 53BP1 telomeric recruitment and telomeric fusion and eventually cell death, all of which were reversible by suppression of RNF168 itself. These results show that MRE11 and UBR5 co-operate to suppress fusion at dysfunctional telomeres.
The DNA damage response (DDR), comprising distinct repair and signalling pathways, safeguards genomic integrity. Protein ubiquitylation is an important regulatory mechanism of the DDR. To study its role in the UV-induced DDR, we characterized changes in protein ubiquitylation following DNA damage using quantitative di-Gly proteomics. Interestingly, we identified multiple sites of histone H1 that are ubiquitylated upon UV-damage. We show that UV-dependent histone H1 ubiquitylation at multiple lysines is mediated by the E3-ligase HUWE1. Recently, it was shown that poly-ubiquitylated histone H1 is an important signalling intermediate in the double strand break response. This poly-ubiquitylation is dependent on RNF8 and Ubc13 which extend pre-existing ubiquitin modifications to K63-linked chains. Here we demonstrate that HUWE1 depleted cells showed reduced recruitment of RNF168 and 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage, two factors downstream of RNF8 mediated histone H1 poly-ubiquitylation, while recruitment of MDC1, which act upstream of histone H1 ubiquitylation, was not affected. Our data show that histone H1 is a prominent target for ubiquitylation after UV-induced DNA damage. Our data are in line with a model in which HUWE1 primes histone H1 with ubiquitin to allow ubiquitin chain elongation by RNF8, thereby stimulating the RNF8-RNF168 mediated DDR.
Germline mutations in the RING finger protein gene RNF168 have been identified in a combined immunodeficiency disorder called RIDDLE syndrome. Since only two patients have been described with somewhat different phenotypes, there is need to identify further patients. Here, we report on two Polish siblings with RNF168 deficiency due to homozygosity for a novel frameshift mutation, c.295delG, that was identified through exome sequencing. Both patients presented with immunoglobulin deficiency, telangiectasia, cellular radiosensitivity, and increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. The younger sibling had a more pronounced neurological and morphological phenotype, and she also carried an ATM gene mutation in the heterozygous state. Immunoblot analyses showed absence of RNF168 protein, whereas ATM levels and function were proficient in lymphoblastoid cells from both patients. Consistent with the absence of RNF168 protein, 53BP1 recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) after irradiation was undetectable in lymphoblasts or primary fibroblasts from either of the two patients. γH2AX foci accumulated normally but they disappeared with significant delay, indicating a severe defect in DSB repair. A comparison with the two previously identified patients indicates immunoglobulin deficiency, cellular radiosensitivity, and increased AFP levels as hallmarks of RNF168 deficiency. The variability in its clinical expression despite similar cellular phenotypes suggests that some manifestations of RNF168 deficiency may be modified by additional genetic or epidemiological factors.
The DNA damage response (DDR) associated post-translational modifications recruit chromatin remodelers, signaling proteins such as 53BP1 and repair factors to chromatin flanking DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) to promote its repair. Although localization of both RNF168 ubiquitin ligase and SET8 methyltransferase at DSBs is essential for 53BP1’s recruitment to DSBs, it is unclear if they do so via the same pathways. Here we report that RNF168 mediates SET8’s recruitment to DSBs. Depletion of cellular pool of ubiquitin through proteasome inhibition abolished RNF168 and SET8’s localization to DNA damage. Knockdown of RNF8 or RNF168 abolished SET8’s recruitment to DNA damage. Moreover, RNF168 and SET8 form stable complexes in vivo. Based on these results we propose a model in which SET8, which despite being a pan-chromatin binding protein, can accumulate several folds at chromatin flanking DSBs through tethering to other proteins that specifically localize to chromatin regions with specific modifications.
DNA double strand break (DSB) responses depend on the sequential actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 plus E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13 to specifically generate histone Lys-63-linked ubiquitin chains in DSB signaling. Here, we defined the activated RNF8-Ubc13∼ubiquitin complex by x-ray crystallography and its functional solution conformations by x-ray scattering, as tested by separation-of-function mutations imaged in cells by immunofluorescence. The collective results show that the RING E3 RNF8 targets E2 Ubc13 to DSB sites and plays a critical role in damage signaling by stimulating polyubiquitination through modulating conformations of ubiquitin covalently linked to the Ubc13 active site. Structure-guided separation-of-function mutations show that the RNF8 E2 stimulating activity is essential for DSB signaling in mammalian cells and is necessary for downstream recruitment of 53BP1 and BRCA1. Chromatin-targeted RNF168 rescues 53BP1 recruitment involved in non-homologous end joining but not BRCA1 recruitment for homologous recombination. These findings suggest an allosteric approach to targeting the ubiquitin-docking cleft at the E2-E3 interface for possible interventions in cancer and chronic inflammation, and moreover, they establish an independent RNF8 role in BRCA1 recruitment.
The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 is a DNA damage response (DDR) factor that promotes monoubiquitination of H2A/H2AX at K13/15, facilitates recruitment of other DDR factors (e.g. 53BP1) to DNA damage, and inhibits homologous recombination (HR) in cells deficient in the tumor suppressor BRCA1. We have examined the domains of RNF168 important for these DDR events, including chromosomal HR that is induced by several nucleases (I-SceI, CAS9-WT and CAS9-D10A), since the inducing nuclease affects the relative frequency of distinct repair outcomes. We found that an N-terminal fragment of RNF168 (1-220/N221*) efficiently inhibits HR induced by each of these nucleases in BRCA1 depleted cells, and promotes recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA damage and H2AX monoubiquitination at K13/15. Each of these DDR events requires a charged residue in RNF168 (R57). Notably, RNF168-N221* fails to self-accumulate into ionizing radiation induced foci (IRIF). Furthermore, expression of RNF168 WT and N221* can significantly bypass the role of another E3 ubiquitin ligase, RNF8, for inhibition of HR in BRCA1 depleted cells, and for promotion of 53BP1 IRIF. We suggest that the ability for RNF168 to promote H2A/H2AX monoubiquitination and 53BP1 IRIF, but not RNF168 self-accumulation into IRIF, is important for inhibition of HR in BRCA1 deficient cells.
No abstract available
No abstract available
The cell-cycle regulated methyltransferase SET8 is the sole enzyme responsible for the mono-methylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20) that is the substrate for di- and tri-methylation mainly by SUV4-20Hs enzymes. Both SET8 and SUV4-20Hs have been implicated in regulating DNA repair pathway choice through the inverse affinities of BRCA1-BARD1 and 53BP1 complexes for disparate methylation states of H4K20. However, the precise and respective functions of each H4K20 methyltransferases in DNA repair pathways remained to be clarified. Here, we show that SET8 acts as a potent chromatin inhibitor of homologous recombination and that its timely degradation during DNA replication is essential for the spontaneous nuclear focal accumulation of BRCA1 and RAD51 complexes during S-phase. Strikingly, the anti-recombinogenic function of SET8 is independent of SUV4-20H activity but requires the subsequent recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase RNF168. Moreover, we show that SET8-induced BRCA1 inhibition is not necessarily related to the loss of BARD1 binding to unmethylated histone H4K20. Instead, it is largely caused by the accumulation of 53BP1 in a manner depending on the concerted activities of SET8 and RNF168 on chromatin. Conversely, the lack of SET8 and H4K20 mono-methylation on newly assembly chromatin after DNA replication led to the untimely accumulation of BRCA1 on chromatin at the subsequent G1 phase. Altogether, these results establish the de novo activity of SET8 on chromatin as a primordial epigenetic lock of BRCA1-mediated HR pathway during the cell cycle.
Ubiquitylation plays key roles in DNA damage signal transduction. The current model envisions that lysine63-linked ubiquitin chains, via the concerted action of E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8-RNF168, are built at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to effectively assemble DNA damage-repair factors for proper checkpoint control and DNA repair. We found that RNF168 is a short-lived protein that is stabilized by the deubiquitylating enzyme USP34 in response to DNA damage. In the absence of USP34, RNF168 is rapidly degraded, resulting in attenuated DSB-associated ubiquitylation, defective recruitment of BRCA1 and 53BP1 and compromised cell survival after ionizing radiation. We propose that USP34 promotes a feed-forward loop to enforce ubiquitin signaling at DSBs and highlight critical roles of ubiquitin dynamics in genome stability maintenance.
A DNA damage response (DDR), particularly on double-stranded breaks (DSBs); RNF8 and RNF168 are crucial E3 ligases that are recruited first to the site of DNA damage. RNF8 initiates the conjugation of ubiquitin with H2A and H2AX, subsequently, RNF168 is employed to amplify the K-63-linked ubiquitin chain. These two E3 ligases are necessary for the downstream signaling where 53BP1 and BRCA1 are recruited. RNF168 directs 53BP1 involvement in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) but is unable to save BRCA1 which is involved in homologous recombination (HR); therefore, it is RNF8 that plays a huge role in the recruitment of BRCA1. As recently BRCA1 has come up as a potential E3 ligase in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and damage to its heterodimeric partner BARD1 results in mislocalization of BRCA1 to cytosol that further joins tau lesion. Therefore, in this cumbersome signaling cascade, we took RNF8 to study. RNF8 and RNF168 plus UBE2N/UBC13 carry therapeutic importance, hence, this study tries to identify potential mutants that can affect the binding affinity of RNF8 with UBE2N, thereby, disturbing its E3 ligase activity.
No abstract available
No abstract available
Background: Ubiquitylation plays important roles in DNA damage signal transduction. However, mechanistic details that drive these ubiquitin-dependent signals at DNA breaks remain to be determined. Results: RNF169 localized at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), inhibited DNA damage-induced ubiquitin formation, and attenuated 53BP1 accumulation. Conclusion: RNF169 antagonizes ubiquitin signaling at DNA DSBs. Significance: RNF169 represents a negative regulator of the ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage signaling cascade. Ubiquitin signals emanating from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger the ordered assembly of DNA damage mediator and repair proteins. This highly orchestrated process is accomplished, in part, through the concerted action of the RNF8 and RNF168 E3 ligases, which have emerged as core signaling intermediates that promote DSB-associated ubiquitylation events. In this study, we report the identification of RNF169 as a negative regulator of the DNA damage signaling cascade. We found that RNF169 interacted with ubiquitin structures and relocalized to DSBs in an RNF8/RNF168-dependent manner. Moreover, ectopic expression of RNF169 attenuated ubiquitin signaling and compromised 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites, suggesting that RNF169 antagonizes RNF168 functions at DSBs. Our study unveils RNF169 as a component in DNA damage signal transduction and adds to the complexity of regulatory ubiquitylation in genome stability maintenance.
DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) represent the most destructive type of chromosomal lesion and trigger rapid chromatin restructuring accompanied by accumulation of proteins in the vicinity of the DSB. Non‐proteolytic ubiquitylation of chromatin surrounding DSBs, mediated by the RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade, has emerged as a key mechanism for restoration of genome integrity by licensing the DSB‐modified chromatin to concentrate genome caretaker proteins such as 53BP1 and BRCA1 near the lesions. In parallel, SUMOylation of upstream DSB regulators is also required for execution of this ubiquitin‐dependent chromatin response, but its molecular basis is currently unclear. Here, we discuss recent insights into how ubiquitin‐ and SUMO‐dependent signaling processes cooperate to orchestrate protein interactions with sites of DNA damage to facilitate DSB repair.
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
The faithful repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential to safeguard genome stability. DSBs elicit a signaling cascade involving the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8/RNF168 and the ubiquitin-dependent assembly of the BRCA1-Abraxas-RAP80-MERIT40 complex. The association of BRCA1 with ubiquitin conjugates through RAP80 is known to be inhibitory to DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR). However, the precise regulation of this mechanism remains poorly understood. Through genetic screens we identified USP26 and USP37 as key de-ubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) that limit the repressive impact of RNF8/RNF168 on HR. Both DUBs are recruited to DSBs where they actively remove RNF168-induced ubiquitin conjugates. Depletion of USP26 or USP37 disrupts the execution of HR and this effect is alleviated by the simultaneous depletion of RAP80. We demonstrate that USP26 and USP37 prevent excessive spreading of RAP80-BRCA1 from DSBs. On the other hand, we also found that USP26 and USP37 promote the efficient association of BRCA1 with PALB2. This suggests that these DUBs limit the ubiquitin-dependent sequestration of BRCA1 via the BRCA1-Abraxas-RAP80-MERIT40 complex, while promoting complex formation and cooperation of BRCA1 with PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 during HR. These findings reveal a novel ubiquitin-dependent mechanism that regulates distinct BRCA1-containing complexes for efficient repair of DSBs by HR.
RNF168 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase critical to the mammalian DNA double-strand break repair response. The protein is recruited to and amplifies ubiquitin signals at damaged chromatin and, if not properly regulated, can drive an uncontrolled ubiquitin cascade potentially harmful to repair outcomes. Several indirect mechanisms restrict RNF168 positive feedback, and a longstanding question has been whether these alone suppress excessive RNF168 signaling or whether mechanisms to remove RNF168 from damaged chromatin exist. Here, we reveal a cascade of post-translational modifications which act at three adjacent amino acids, threonine-208, proline-209 and lysine-210, to process RNF168 actively. Phosphorylation at threonine-208 by CDK1/2 induces interaction with the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase PIN1. PIN1 promotes RNF168 SUMOylation at lysine-210, resulting in p97/VCP mediated removal. These actions promote RNF168 clearance and limit RNF168 chromatin build-up. Thus, single amino acid substitutions of the regulatory motif (SUMO-PIN1-assisted Chromatin Regulator, SPaCR) that restrict PIN1 interaction or SUMOylation are sufficient to drive supraphysiological accumulation of RNF168, increased ubiquitin signaling, excessive 53BP1 recruitment and radiosensitivity. Our findings define a mechanism of direct RNF168 regulation that is part of the normal damage response, promoting RNF168 dissociation from chromatin and limiting deleterious ubiquitin signaling. The ubiquitin ligase, RNF168, promotes DNA break repair but must be regulated to prevent run-away ubiquitin signaling. Here, the authors identify a three-step post-translational cascade regulating RNF168 chromatin removal, acting to suppress excessive signaling and radiosensitivity.
SUMMARY SLX4/FANCP is a key Fanconi anemia (FA) protein and a DNA repair scaffold for incision around a DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) by its partner XPF nuclease. The tandem UBZ4 ubiquitin-binding domains of SLX4 are critical for the recruitment of SLX4 to damage sites, likely by binding to K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. However, the identity of the ubiquitin E3 ligase that mediates SLX4 recruitment remains unknown. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA) screening with a GFP-tagged N-terminal half of SLX4 (termed SLX4-N), we identify the RNF168 E3 ligase as a critical factor for mitomycin C (MMC)-induced SLX4 foci formation. RNF168 and GFP-SLX4-N colocalize in MMC-induced ubiquitin foci. Accumulation of SLX4-N at psoralen-laser ICL tracks or of endogenous SLX4 at Digoxigenin-psoralen/UVA ICL is dependent on RNF168. Finally, we find that RNF168 is epistatic with SLX4 in promoting MMC tolerance. We conclude that RNF168 is a critical component of the signal transduction that recruits SLX4 to ICL damage.
The chemical synthesis of histones with homogeneous modifications is a potent approach for quantitatively deciphering the functional crosstalk between different post-translational modifications (PTMs). Here, we developed an expedient site-specific (poly)ubiquitylation strategy (CAEPL, Cysteine-Aminoethylation coupled with Enzymatic Protein Ligation), which integrates the Cys-aminoethylation reaction with the process of ubiquitin-activating enzyme UBA1-assisted native chemical ligation. Using this strategy, we successfully prepared monoubiquitylated and K63-linked di- and tri-ubiquitylated linker histone H1.0 proteins, which were incorporated into individual chromatosomes. Quantitative biochemical analysis of different RNF168 constructs on ubiquitylated chromatosomes with different ubiquitin lengths demonstrated that K63-linked polyubiquitylated H1.0 could directly stimulate RNF168 ubiquitylation activity by enhancing the affinity between RNF168 and chromatosome. Subsequent cryo-EM structural analysis of the RNF168/UbcH5c–Ub/H1.0–K63-Ub3 chromatosome complex revealed the potential recruitment orientation between RNF168 UDM1 domain and K63-linked ubiquitin chain on H1.0. Finally, we explored the impact of H1.0 ubiquitylation on RNF168 activity in the context of asymmetric H1.0–K63-Ub3 di-nucleosome substrate, revealing a comparable stimulation effect of both the inter- and intra-nucleosomal crosstalk. Overall, our study highlights the significance of access to structurally-defined polyubiquitylated H1.0 by CAEPL strategy, enabling in-depth mechanistic investigations of in-trans PTM crosstalk between linker histone H1.0 and core histone H2A ubiquitylation.
No abstract available
No abstract available
No abstract available
The cellular response to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) involves the ordered assembly of repair proteins at or near sites of damage. This process is mediated through post-translational protein modifications that include both phosphorylation and ubiquitylation. Recent data have demonstrated that recruitment of the repair proteins BRCA1, 53BP1, and RAD18 to ionizing irradiation (IR) induced DSBs is dependent on formation of non-canonical K63-linked polyubiquitin chains by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases. Here we report a novel role for K63-ubiquitylation in response to replication-associated DSBs that contributes to both cell survival and maintenance of genome stability. Suppression of K63-ubiquitylation markedly increases large-scale mutations and chromosomal aberrations in response to endogenous or exogenous replication-associated DSBs. These effects are associated with an S-phase specific defect in DNA repair as revealed by an increase in residual 53BP1 foci. Use of both knockdown and knockout cell lines indicates that unlike the case for IR-induced DSBs, the requirement for K63-ubiquitylation for the repair of replication associated DSBs was found to be RNF8-independent. Our findings reveal the existence of a novel K63-ubiquitylation dependent repair pathway that contributes to the maintenance of genome integrity in response to replication-associated DSBs.
No abstract available
BRCA1, which is mutated in the familial forms of breast and ovarian cancer, plays important roles in genome stability through its participation in DNA damage response (DDR) following double-stranded breaks (DSBs). BRCA1 activates the checkpoint pathway to retard cell cycle progression and stimulates repair of the DSBs (reviewed in ref. 1). It is recruited to the damaged chromatin through an interaction with RAP80 that binds to K63 ubiquitin chain on histones H2A and γH2AX.1 Recruitment of BRCA1 at the damaged-sites on chromatin is detected by co-immunostaining with γH2AX that forms microscopically visible aggregates, also known as “foci.” Studies on double-stranded break repair (DSBR) provided evidence that BRCA1 is important for driving repair through homologous recombination (HR), mainly by antagonizing the activities of 53BP1 (Reviewed in 2). 53BP1 promotes DSBR through the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. In the absence of functional BRCA1 error-prone NHEJ pathway prevails, whereas recruitment of BRCA1 opposes the activity of 53BP1 and directs repair through the more reliable mechanism of HR. That concept was supported also by studies in mouse models in which it was shown that the embryonic defects and chromosomal abnormality in BRCA1-mutant mice were reversed by deletion of the 53BP1 alleles (2 and references therein). Therefore, we have gained some insights into how BRCA1 maintains genome integrity. The mechanism by which BRCA1 is recruited to the damaged chromatin has been studied extensively, because the components in that mechanism are likely to be involved in the tumor suppression pathway of BRCA1. Those studies led to the identification of 2 E3 ligases, RNF8 and RNF168, which are recruited by MDC1 at the damaged chromatin (ref. 1 and references therein). Once recruited, these ligases introduce K63 ubiquitin chains on K13/K15 residues in H2A/γH2AX.3 The K63 ubiquitin chains on H2A/γH2AX are recognized by RAP80 that leads to the recruitment of BRCA1.4 The recruitment of 53BP1 also requires ubiquitylation; however, the mechanism is indirect. It is thought that ubiquitylation unmasks chromatin, exposing methylated histones recognized by the Tudor domain of 53BP1.5 Given the critical roles of ubiquitylation in recruiting BRCA1 and 53BP1 onto the damaged chromatin, the deubiquitylating enzymes that reverse the effects of RNF8/RNF168 have drawn a lot of attention, at least partly because of their obvious implications in oncogenesis. In that regard one study6 demonstrated USP44 to be involved in inhibiting recruitment of 53BP1 and RAP80 to the damaged chromatin. USP44 promotes deubiquitylation of H2A and antagonizes the recruitment of RNF168. In an equally elegant study, Dr. Wani’s group, in the January 1, 2014 issue of Cell Cycle, shows that USP3 counteracts the effects of RNF168 by inducing deubiquitylation on K13/K15 residues of H2A/γH2AX.7 USP3 was shown to be involved in deubiquitylation of H2A at K119, which is the ubquitylation target of the polycomb group proteins (7 and references therein). The Wani lab clearly demonstrates USP3 catalyzes deubiquitylation of K63 ubiquitin chain on K13/K15 residues in H2A and γH2AX. That new observation on USP3 is highly significant, as the authors show that USP3 regulates recruitment of BRCA1 and 53BP1. Cells overexpressing USP3 exhibited attenuated levels of BRCA1 and 53BP1 “foci.” Interestingly, the authors did not see a stable interaction of USP3 with the damaged chromatin, suggesting the possibility that the deubiquitylation process by USP3 is highly catalytic. It is possible that the deubiquitylation of H2A/γH2AX is important for restoring normal chromatin structure after repair. A potential role of the deubiquitylation for some later steps of DSBR has not been ruled out. Previous studies demonstrated that USP3 is required for genome stability and progression through S phase.8 Although overexpression of USP3 removed both BRCA1 and 53BP1 from the damaged chromatin, the observations by the Wani group are significant, because overexpression of USP3 could have a negative effect on DSBR. In that regard it is noteworthy that, while BRCA1 mutations are found in only small percentages of breast and ovarian cancers, genome instability is a common feature in those cancers. It will be important to determine whether USP3 or USP44 that removes BRCA1/RAP80 is overexpressed in breast/ovarian cancers. Tumor microarray analyses for these proteins might generate valuable insights into the basis of genome instability phenotype of breast/ovarian cancers.
DNA damage is an ever-present challenge to genome stability and cell viability. Responses to DNA damage assume particular significance in the clinic, where the majority of cancer patients are treated with ionizing radiation (IR) and systemic DNA damaging agents at doses intended to kill malignant cells while sparing normal cells. Following the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), a large number of proteins implicated in DNA damage signaling and repair rapidly associate in distinct nuclear microenvironments that are believed to be focused on the incident lesions.1 The hierarchical assembly of DNA damage-responsive proteins at DSBs has been well studied through analyses of IR-induced nuclear foci (IRIF), and the kinetics of IRIF assembly and resolution have been presumed to correlate with DNA damage signaling and repair. IRIF assembly is driven by a cascade of reversible posttranslational modifications that include ubiquitylations on DSB-flanking chromatin.2,3 RNF8, a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, plays a key proximal role in DNA damage sensing and repair and is rapidly associated in IRIF, where it polyubiquitinates type 2A histones. RNF8-mediated histone H2A ubiquitylation generates binding sites for the ubiquitin binding domain (UBD) of RNF168, an unrelated RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. RNF168 further increases the ubiquitylation state of DSB-flanking chromatin, facilitating the association of additional repair factors, including 53BP1, and the ubiquitin ligases BRCA1 and RAD18. Most DSBs are repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR), and the choice between these pathways is determined at the level of 5′ end resection, which is believed to commit DSB repair to the HR pathway. 53BP1, a principal component of IRIF and DSB-induced foci, blocks the resection of chromatid breaks during class switch recombination, thereby suppressing HR and promoting NHEJ.4,5 The stoichiometry of DNA damage signaling and repair proteins associated at IRIF is thus a potentially important and incompletely understood determinant of the selection of DSB repair pathway and, ultimately, DNA damage tolerance. In this issue, Helchowski et al.6 provide new and cautionary insight into the biological significance of IRIF. These investigators show that RAD18 overexpression dramatically impairs 53BP1 and RAP80-BRCA1 association at IRIF. Remarkably, a NLS-GFP-RAD18 fragment comprising minimally the UBD and a short juxtaposed “LRM” targeting sequence7 is sufficient to inhibit 53BP1 association at IRIF and concomitantly increase HR. This disruption of 53BP1 association at IRIF appears to be caused by the selective and competitive binding of overexpressed RAD18 UBD-LRM to as-yet-unidentified ubiquitylated proteins on DSB-flanking chromatin. The impairment of 53BP1 and RAP80-BRCA1 association at IRIF in RAD18-overexpressing cells did not affect DNA damage signaling, overall rates of DSB repair, or radiosensitivity. The long-term consequences were confined to the redirection of DSB repair to favor the HR mechanism. The results of Helchowski6 extend previous studies showing that ectopic expression of full-length RNF169 (an RNF168 paralog that recognizes polyubiquitin structures but does not itself contribute to DSB-induced chromatin ubiquitylation) impaired 53BP1 and RAP80-BRCA1 association but not H2AX phosphorylation at IRIF.7,8 The impaired 53BP1 and RAP80-BRCA1 association at IRIF in cells overexpressing RNF169 required an intact UBD (but not E3 ubiquitin ligase activity) and caused reduced NHEJ efficiency and increased HR efficiency without impacting radiosensitivity. Together, these studies demonstrate that overexpressed UBDs can change the stoichiometry of proteins associated at IRIF and thereby redirect DSB repair from NHEJ to HR. These data are extremely provocative: while IRIF have been used as correlatives for many studies of DNA damage signaling and repair, to our knowledge, these recent studies are the first to directly and deliberately manipulate the stoichiometry of IRIF components without knockdown or knockout and elicit robust cellular phenotypes. The study by Helchowski6 is also a cautionary tale that illustrates how commonly used protein probes of DNA damage signaling and repair (such as GFP-tagged DNA repair proteins) can perturb the very systems they are designed to study, leading to artifacts and misinterpretation. However, the practice of medical oncology requires that malignant cells be selectively perturbed. The demonstration that the selection of DNA repair pathway can be manipulated with a relatively short polypeptide suggests a clinical opportunity to inhibit NHEJ in malignant cells with acquired mutations in HR genes, with the expectation of achieving selective malignant cell killing. (Fig. 1) Figure 1. The stoichiometry of the ubiquitin-binding proteins RAD18 and RNF169 associated at ionizing radiation-induced foci impacts 53BP1 association and the selection of DSB repair mechanism.
Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification (PTM) that is involved in proteolysis, protein–protein interaction, and signal transduction. Accumulation of mutations and genomic instability are characteristic of cancer cells, and dysfunction of the ubiquitin pathway can contribute to abnormal cell physiology. Because mutations can be critical for cells, DNA damage repair, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis are pathways that are in close communication to maintain genomic integrity. Uncontrolled cell proliferation due to abnormal processes is a hallmark of cancer, and mutations, changes in expression levels, and other alterations of ubiquitination factors are often involved. Here, three E3 ubiquitin ligases will be reviewed in detail. RNF126, RNF168 and CUL1 are involved in DNA damage response (DDR), DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, cell cycle regulation, and ultimately, cancer cell proliferation control. Their involvement in multiple cellular pathways makes them an attractive candidate for cancer-targeting therapy. Functional studies of these E3 ligases have increased over the years, and their significance in cancer is well reported. There are continuous efforts to develop drugs targeting the ubiquitin pathway for anticancer therapy, which opens up the possibility for these E3 ligases to be evaluated for their potential as a target protein for anticancer therapy.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, and due to the lack of robust therapeutic targets, treatment options remain limited to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and surgical resection. Autophagy, a lysosome-dependent degradation process, is typically regarded as a survival mechanism. However, excessive degradation of ferritin may indirectly lead to Fe²⁺ accumulation, thereby facilitating ferroptosis. In this study, we reveal for the first time the existence of a TRIM39-RNF168 ubiquitination axis in the TNBC model that targets autophagy-dependent ferroptosis in TNBC cells. The high expression of TRIM39 in TNBC cells confers resistance to ferroptosis and enhances cell survival. Regulation of the TRIM39-RNF168 axis, achieved by knocking down TRIM39 or RNF168, can activate autophagy-coupled ferroptosis in TNBC cells. The activated autophagy-ferroptosis pathway effectively suppresses TNBC progression in vivo, presenting a promising potential therapeutic approach.
Abstract Cells are constantly challenged by genotoxic stresses that can lead to genome instability. The integrity of the nuclear genome is preserved by the DNA damage response (DDR) and repair. Additionally, these stresses can induce mitochondria to transiently hyperfuse; however, it remains unclear whether canonical DDR is linked to these mitochondrial morphological changes. Here, we report that the abolition of mitochondrial fusion causes a substantial defect in the ATM-mediated DDR signaling. This deficiency is overcome by the restoration of mitochondria fusion. In cells with fragmented mitochondria, genotoxic stress-induced activation of JNK and its translocation to DNA lesion are lost. Importantly, the mitochondrial fusion machinery of MFN1/MFN2 associates with Sab (SH3BP5) and JNK, and these interactions are indispensable for the Sab-mediated activation of JNK and the ATM-mediated DDR signaling. Accordingly, the formation of BRCA1 and 53BP1 foci, as well as homology and end-joining repair are impaired in cells with fragmented mitochondria. Together, these data show that mitochondrial fusion-dependent JNK signaling is essential for the DDR, providing vital insight into the integration of nuclear and cytoplasmic stress signals.
Translational control shapes the proteome and is particularly important in regulating gene expression under stress. A key source of endothelial stress is treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which lowers cancer mortality but increases cardiovascular mortality. Using a human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived endothelial cell (hiPSC-EC) model of sunitinib-induced vascular dysfunction combined with ribosome profiling, we assessed the role of translational control in hiPSC-ECs in response to stress. We identified staphylococcal nuclease and tudor domain–containing protein 1 (SND1) as a sunitinib-dependent translationally repressed gene. SND1 translational repression was mediated by the mTORC1/4E-BP1 pathway. SND1 inhibition led to endothelial dysfunction, whereas SND1 OE protected against sunitinib-induced endothelial dysfunction. Mechanistically, SND1 transcriptionally regulated UBE2N, an E2-conjugating enzyme that mediates K63-linked ubiquitination. UBE2N along with the E3 ligases RNF8 and RNF168 regulated the DNA damage repair response pathway to mitigate the deleterious effects of sunitinib. In silico analysis of FDA-approved drugs led to the identification of an ACE inhibitor, ramipril, that protected against sunitinib-induced vascular dysfunction in vitro and in vivo, all while preserving the efficacy of cancer therapy. Our study established a central role for translational control of SND1 in sunitinib-induced endothelial dysfunction that could potentially be therapeutically targeted to reduce sunitinib-induced vascular toxicity.
Summary The DNA damage response (DDR) relies on a complex protein network to maintain genomic integrity, yet the interplay between post-translational modifiers remains poorly understood. Here, we uncover a novel regulatory axis between the E3 ubiquitin ligase DTX3L and the deubiquitinase USP28 at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Our results reveal a sophisticated feedback mechanism in which DTX3L ubiquitinates USP28, leading to its proteasomal degradation, while USP28 counteracts by deubiquitinating both itself and DTX3L. This cross-regulation fine-tunes DSB repair in multiple pathways, including non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Strikingly, the detrimental effects of USP28 depletion on these repair pathways were rescued by concurrent DTX3L knockdown. Collectively, our work uncovers a novel layer of DDR regulation in which DTX3L and USP28’s antagonistic activities calibrate cellular responses to genotoxic stress, thus identifying promising therapeutic targets to combat diseases associated with genomic instability.
Proteasomal degradation of topoisomerase I (topoI) is one of the most remarkable cellular phenomena observed in response to camptothecin (CPT). Importantly, the rate of topoI degradation is linked to CPT resistance. Formation of the topoI-DNA-CPT cleavable complex inhibits DNA re-ligation resulting in DNA-double strand break (DSB). The degradation of topoI marks the first step in the ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPP) dependent DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we show that the Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer binds with topoI, and that the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) phosphorylates topoI on serine 10 (topoI-pS10), which is subsequently ubiquitinated by BRCA1. A higher basal level of topoI-pS10 ensures rapid topoI degradation leading to CPT resistance. Importantly, PTEN regulates DNA-PKcs kinase activity in this pathway and PTEN deletion ensures DNA-PKcs dependent higher topoI-pS10, rapid topoI degradation and CPT resistance.
合并后的分组全面描绘了 RNF168 的多维研究版图:从底层的原子结构与核小体识别生化机制,到 RNF8-RNF168 核心信号通路的构建,再到其在 DNA 修复路径决策(HR/NHEJ)中的杠杆作用。报告同时详尽地总结了 RNF168 极其复杂的翻译后修饰调控网络(含去泛素化、相分离等前沿机制),并最终落脚于其在 RIDDLE 综合征、肿瘤防治及病毒免疫中的临床价值,为理解基因组稳定性维护提供了完整的知识框架。