Turn an Innovation Competition Idea into a Plan and Pitch Deck with Acadwrite

Teams often begin with a product direction but lack a specific user, problem, and solution. Acadwrite separates the idea into user needs, existing solutions, technical paths, and application conditions, then searches industry reports, policies, and papers around those questions.

After reading the results, Agent extracts objects, methods, conclusions, and conditions. The team can see what existing solutions address and what its own solution must add. Claims without material support should be revised or removed.

During review, ask directly: “Where did this market-size number come from?” If the team cannot answer, add the source, year, and statistical definition.

For an example of award ratios and advancement rules, see Hubei University's published rules: about 10% gold, 20% silver, and 30% bronze. Provincial advancement must follow the current notice from your institution.

Read the 2025 official evaluation rules first. The creative group totals 100 points: personal growth 30, project innovation 30, industry value 25, and teamwork 15. Acadwrite organizes the plan around those four dimensions. Literature and policy support the background, fieldwork supports user problems, market data supports industry value, and team roles must match actual tasks.

The largest category, personal growth, emphasizes depth of research, sound logic, and applying knowledge. Agent can read industry reports, policies, and papers for defensible claims, then clean, categorize, and analyze surveys, interview coding, or public data. Every chart must state its data definition and conclusion.

A complete plan gives a source note for every market estimate, explains positioning and implementation prospects in competitor analysis, and documents role allocation and disciplinary composition on the team slide.

Evaluation source: the official 2025 evaluation rules.

Provincial rounds begin with document review, where evaluators see the uploaded PDF without a live explanation. The national final also includes review before the on-site round. The document must stand alone, so headings should state judgments instead of generic labels such as “Core Technology” or “Application Cases.”

Acadwrite can rewrite section labels as complete claims and add a conclusion to every chart. Agent also checks coverage of evaluation dimensions and adapts research-report language to the competition's project vocabulary. Any slide that cannot state a conclusion needs more evidence.

National-final review source: the Beijing Municipal Education Commission notice.

Pitch lengths vary by competition level. A campus round may allow a ten-minute pitch and five-minute Q&A, while another uses five minutes plus three. Teams must adjust slide count and content to the official limit.

Acadwrite extracts the problem, research findings, solution, novelty, and industry value from the plan, then creates an editable pitch draft for the speaking time. A five-minute version keeps only slides that directly support evaluation criteria and reuses the plan's data and conclusions to avoid contradictions.

Under the rules, presenters must be student team members, no more than three may appear, and advisers cannot participate. Presenters should collectively cover the project narrative, technical explanation, and market research.

For examples of time limits, see the rules published by Hubei University and Hebei University of Science and Technology.

Check that materials are complete. The plan must cover the problem, solution, novelty, industry value, and team roles. Data analysis must produce interpretable charts, and the pitch deck must fit the time limit.

Review documents must stand independently from live narration. Every slide heading should state a conclusion, and every industry statistic should identify its source, year, and statistical definition.

Continue reading